16 Bit Checksum Error Rate
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and 16 bit checksum calculator policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the
16 Bit Checksum C
company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users
16 Bit Checksum Algorithm
Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes
16 Bit Checksum C Code
a minute: Sign up Can a TCP checksum produce a false positive? If yes, how is this dealt with? up vote 28 down vote favorite 5 If a TCP payload gets corrupted in transit the recomputed checksum won't match the transmitted checksum. Great, all fine so far. If a TCP checksum gets corrupted in transit the recomputed checksum won't match the now checksum error in the encrypted file winrar corrupted checksum. Great, all fine so far. What happens when both the payload and checksum get corrupted and the recomputed checksum, whilst different to what it should be, just happens to match the now corrupted checksum? I can see with a good checksum algorithm (and additional checksums at lower levels) this might be very, very unlikely but isn't TCP meant to be 100% reliable? How does it resolve these false positives? networking tcp ip share|improve this question asked Sep 30 '10 at 11:46 Mr Question McQuestion 14123 add a comment| 6 Answers 6 active oldest votes up vote 13 down vote Something that should be noted here, and that most people overlook completely, is the fact, that the TCP checksum is actually a very poor checksum. The TCP checksum is a 16-bit ones-complement sum of the data. This sum will catch any burst error of 15 bits or less, and all 16-bit burst errors except for those which replace one 1’s complement zero with another (i.e., 16 adjacent 1 bits replaced by 16 zero bits, or vice-versa). Over uniformly distributed data, it
since March 2016. A cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is an error-detecting code commonly used in digital networks and storage devices to detect accidental changes to raw data. Blocks of data entering these systems checksum error windows 7 get a short check value attached, based on the remainder of a polynomial checksum error fix division of their contents. On retrieval, the calculation is repeated and, in the event the check values do not match, corrective checksum error witcher 3 action can be taken against data corruption. CRCs are so called because the check (data verification) value is a redundancy (it expands the message without adding information) and the algorithm is based on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3830206/can-a-tcp-checksum-produce-a-false-positive-if-yes-how-is-this-dealt-with cyclic codes. CRCs are popular because they are simple to implement in binary hardware, easy to analyze mathematically, and particularly good at detecting common errors caused by noise in transmission channels. Because the check value has a fixed length, the function that generates it is occasionally used as a hash function. The CRC was invented by W. Wesley Peterson in 1961; the 32-bit CRC function of Ethernet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check and many other standards is the work of several researchers and was published in 1975. Contents 1 Introduction 2 Application 3 Data integrity 4 Computation 5 Mathematics 5.1 Designing polynomials 6 Specification 7 Standards and common use 8 Implementations 9 See also 10 References 11 External links Introduction[edit] CRCs are based on the theory of cyclic error-correcting codes. The use of systematic cyclic codes, which encode messages by adding a fixed-length check value, for the purpose of error detection in communication networks, was first proposed by W. Wesley Peterson in 1961.[1] Cyclic codes are not only simple to implement but have the benefit of being particularly well suited for the detection of burst errors, contiguous sequences of erroneous data symbols in messages. This is important because burst errors are common transmission errors in many communication channels, including magnetic and optical storage devices. Typically an n-bit CRC applied to a data block of arbitrary length will detect any single error burst not longer than n bits and will detect a fraction 1 − 2−n of all longer error bursts. Specification of a CRC code requires definition of a so-called generator polynomial. This polynomial becomes the divisor in a polynomial long div
packets were being dropped and the throughput was much lower than normal, but some were still making it through. The hypothesis is that occasionally the corrupt packets had valid TCP and Ethernet checksums. One "lucky" packet stored http://www.evanjones.ca/tcp-and-ethernet-checksums-fail.html corrupt data in memcache. Even after the switch was replaced, the errors continued until the cache was cleared. [Update 2016-02-12: Root cause found: this also involved a kernel bug!] I was very excited to hear about this error, because it is a real-world example of something I wrote about seven years ago: The TCP checksum is weak. However, the Ethernet CRC is strong, so how could a corrupt packet pass both checks? The answer is that the Ethernet CRC 16 bit is recalculated by switches. If the switch corrupts the packet and it has the same TCP checksum, the hardware blindly recalculates a new, valid Ethernet CRC when it goes out. As Mark Callaghan pointed out, this is a very rare scenario and you should never blame the network without strong evidence. However, it isn't impossible and others have written about similar incidents. My conclusion is that if you are creating a new network protocol, please append a 4 byte CRC 16 bit checksum (I suggest CRC32C, implemented in hardware on recent Intel, AMD, and ARM CPUs). An alternative is to use an encryption protocol (e.g. TLS), since they include cryptographic hashes (which fixed a similar incident). The rest of this article describes the details about how this is possible, mostly so I don't forget them. Properties of the TCP checksum The TCP checksum is two bytes long, and can detect any burst error of 15 bits, and most burst errors of 16 bits (excluding switching 0x0000 and 0xffff). This means that to keep the same checksum, a packet must be corrupted in at least two locations, at least 2 bytes apart. If the chance is purely random, we should expect approximately 1 in 216 (approximately 0.001%) of corrupt packets to not be detected. This seems small, but on one Gigabit Ethernet connection, that could be as many as 15 packets per second. For details about how to compute the TCP checksum and its error properties, see RFC 1071. Properties of the Ethernet CRC The Ethernet CRC is substantially stronger, partly because it is twice as long (4 bytes), and partly because CRCs have "good" mathematical properties, such as detecting all 3 bit errors in 1500 byte Ethernet packets (understanding this is beyond my math skills). It appears that most switches discard packets with invalid CRCs when they are received, and recalculate the CRC when the packet goes back ou