Error Bpbrm Could Not Write Progress File
Contents |
SERVICES Services Overview Education Services Business Critical Services Consulting Services Managed Services Appliance Services CUSTOMER CENTER Customer Center Support Community MyVeritas error code 13 in netbackup troubleshooting Customer Success Licensing Programs Licensing Process ABOUT About Corporate Profile socket read failed, an existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (10054) Corporate Leadership Newsroom Research Exchange Investor Relations Careers Legal Contact Us English 中文(简体) English
File Read Failed 13
Français Deutsch Italiano 日本語 한국어 Português Español USA Site: Veritas Veritas PartnerNet What does this message indicate? ERR – could not write progress status
An Existing Connection Was Forcibly Closed By The Remote Host 10054 Netbackup
message to the NAME socket Article:000084688 Publish: Article URL:http://www.veritas.com/docs/000084688 Support / Article Sign In Remember me Forgot Password? Don't have a Veritas Account? Create a Veritas Account now! Welcome First Last Your Profile Logout Sign in to Subscribe Please sign in to set up your subscription. Close Sign In Print Article Products Article Languages Subscribe to this Article Manage your Subscriptions Problem This entry has become much more prevalent within the NetBackup debug logs since NetBackup 7.1. Should it be of concern to the reader? Error Message This bpdbsbora debug log shows several remote writes to place the ‘INF - …’ entries into a progress file. The ‘ERR – ‘ entries are logged because this process does not have a NAME socket connection to bpbrm at the time. 19:16:29.587 [3768] <4> dbc_Write_To_Progress_Log: entering 19:16:29.588 [3768] <4> dbc_RemoteWriteFile: myhost root 76 /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/user_ops/dbext/oracle/progress.1330218989.3768.log a 49 INF - Begin progress logging for process: (3768) 19:16:29.699 [3768] <2> logconnections: BPRD CONNECT FROM 1.1.1.1.2997 TO 1.1.1.1.13724 fd = 5 ... error following first [successful] update of progress file ... 19:16:30.021 [3768] <16> writeToServer: ERR - send() to server on socket failed: Bad file number (9
SERVICES Services Overview Education Services Business Critical Services Consulting Services Managed Services Appliance Services CUSTOMER CENTER Customer Center Support Community MyVeritas Customer Success Licensing Programs Licensing Process ABOUT About Corporate Profile Corporate Leadership Newsroom Research Exchange Investor Relations Careers Legal Contact Us English 中文(简体) English Français Deutsch Italiano 日本語 한국어 Português Español USA Site: Veritas Veritas PartnerNet Backup fails with status 13 after bpbrm reports; socket read failed: errno = 62 - Timer expired Article:000039058 Publish: Article URL:http://www.veritas.com/docs/000039058 Support / Article Sign In Remember me Forgot https://www.veritas.com/support/en_US/article.TECH182435 Password? Don't have a Veritas Account? Create a Veritas Account now! Welcome First Last Your Profile Logout Sign in to Subscribe Please sign in to set up your subscription. Close Sign In Print Article Products Related Articles Article Languages Subscribe to this Article Manage your Subscriptions Problem The backup is started and progressing, but then fails https://www.veritas.com/support/en_US/article.TECH71821 with status 13 after bpbrm reports the following condition. Error bpbrm (pid=XXXXX) socket read failed: errno = 62 - Timer expired Error Message The Job Details in the Activity Monitor shows that the backup was active and progressing until a time expired which caused the status 13. 09:00:12 started process bpbrm (pid=7249) 09:00:20 connecting 09:00:20 connected; connect time: 0:00:00 09:06:20 Error bpbrm (pid=7249) socket read failed: errno = 62 - Timer expired 09:06:20 end writing file read failed (13) The bpbrm debug log confirms that the media manager has mounted and positioned the media but after some amount of time a timer expired. The log may or may not show any meta data arriving from the client before the failure. However, the gap in the timestamps will exceed the current CLIENT_READ_TIMEOUT setting on the media server. This will cause bpbrm to terminate bptm. 09:00:20.183 [7249] <2> write_file_names: successfully wrote buffer to COMM_SOCK 09:00:20.183 [7249] <2> bpbrm write_filelist: wrote CONTINUE on COMM_SOCK 09:00:20.183 [7249] <2> bpbrm
directory ExcludeList Troubleshooting Event 36876 SourceSchannel → Veritas Status Codes, Messages, Explanation and actionrecomendations March 10, 2012 Leave a comment Here you can find all the information https://rodolfovaraujo.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/veritas-status-codes-messages-explanationand-action-recomendations/ related to the Veritas Status Codes. Status Code: 0 Message: http://symantec779.rssing.com/chan-15829474/all_p37.html "the requested operation was successfully completed" Explanation: There were no problems detected with the requested operation. Recommended Action: None, unless this was a database backup performed through a database extension product (for example, NetBackup for Oracle or NetBackup for SQL Server). In those instances, code 0 an existing means the backup script that started the backup ran without error. However, you must check other status as explained in the related NetBackup manual to see if the database was successfully backed up. Status Code: 1 Message: "the requested operation was partially successful" Explanation: A problem that may require corrective action was detected during the requested an existing connection operation. Recommended Action: Check the All Log Entries report and also the progress log (if there is one). Some of the problems that can show up under Status Code 1 are: A file or directory path that is more than 1023 characters long. Could not open a file. On a UNIX system, NetBackup could not get the link name of a file. On a UNIX system, NetBackup could not process a sparse file. Read error encountered in a file. File is of an unknown type. On a UNIX system, the lstat system call fails on a file that is eligible to be backed up. This may be a permission problem. On UNIX, a file could not be locked that has mandatory locking enabled. Status Code: 2 Message: "none of the requested files were backed up" Explanation: A backup or archive could not back up any of the files in the file list. Recommended Action: Verify that the files exist and you have read access to them. On UNIX clients, chec
publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel Embed this content in your HTML Search confirm cancel Report adult content: click to rate: Account: (login) More Channels Showcase RSS Channel Showcase 4853462 RSS Channel Showcase 5930138 RSS Channel Showcase 3185677 RSS Channel Showcase 9325913 Channel Catalog Subsection Catalog Articles on this Page (showing articles 721 to 740 of 2270) 12/18/13--09:40: _Oracle Backup Quest... 12/19/13--01:32: _Exchange Restore - ... 12/19/13--02:15: _SQL backup methods 12/19/13--03:32: _AIR replication in ... 12/19/13--04:32: _Getting error messa... 12/19/13--05:06: _Unable to install N... 12/19/13--07:02: _Status 156 Snapshot... 12/19/13--07:16: _NetBackup 7.6.0.1 a... 12/19/13--08:26: _SQL Restore Failed 12/19/13--09:35: _Migrate Netbackup 7... 12/19/13--10:10: _current bprd log go... 12/20/13--04:21: _support for Hyper-V... 12/20/13--05:26: _running bpdbm-con... 12/20/13--06:10: _partial successful ... 12/20/13--06:49: _BMR - Restoring - "... 12/20/13--07:06: _probleme backup new... 12/20/13--07:23: _ERROR 156 12/20/13--08:48: _Hyper-V backup supp... 12/20/13--08:58: _Errors trying to ba... 12/20/13--13:41: _What is this file u... (showing articles 721 to 740 of 2270) Browse the Latest Snapshot Browsing All Articles (2270 Articles) Live Browser older | 1 | .... | 34 | 35 | 36 | (Page 37) | 38 | 39 | 40 | .... | 114 | newer 0 0 12/18/13--09:40: Oracle Backup Questions Contact us about this article I need a solution Netbackup 7.5.05 If I backup Oracle using an RMAN script, why am I not able to browse the individual files for restore? I need to be able to browse and choose the files I want to restore, but I am unable to. However I can restore the entire backup using the RMAN script. thanks,
0 0 12/19/13--01:32: Exchange Restore - networking problem Contact us about this article I need a solution All, Does anyone know how to get round this problem; I am trying to get Exchange granular restore working, but have come up against a networking problem. I have a Unix media server that is connected to two networks, operation and management (ops, man) : Media01.man.net.com Media01.ops.net.com The Media server’s main I/P puts it in the man network. My Exchange server is in the ops network. Exchange01.ops.net.com Now my problem is that when I create disk storage server and associated, storage pool it always has the owner Media01.man.net.com and when I try to do a granular restore, netback tries to get the exchange server to do a NFS connecti