Error Analysis In Analytical Chemistry
Contents |
simple piece of laboratory equipment, for example a burette or a thermometer, one would expect the number of variables contributing to uncertainties in that measurement to be fewer than a measurement which is the result of a theory of errors in analytical chemistry multi-step process consisting of two or more weight measurements, a titration and the use
Types Of Error Analytical Chemistry
of a variety of reagents. It is important to be able to estimate the uncertainty in any measurement because not doing so leaves
Qualitative Analysis In Analytical Chemistry
the investigator as ignorant as though there were no measurement at all. The phrase "not doing so" perpetuates the myth that somehow a person can make a measurement and not know anything about the variability of
Analytical Chemistry Data Analysis
the measurement. That doesn't happen very often. A needle swings back and forth or a digital output shows a slight instability, so the investigator can estimate the uncertainty, but what if a gross error is made in judgment, leading one to estimate an unrealistic "safe" envelope of uncertainty in the measurement? Consider the anecdote offered by Richard Feynman about one of his experiences while working on the Manhattan Project during World War II. Although analytical chemistry and quantitative analysis this example doesn't address the uncertainty of a particular measurement it touches on problems which can arise when there is complete ignorance of parameter boundaries: Some of the special problems I had at Los Alamos were rather interesting. One thing had to do with the safety of the plant at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Los Alamos was going to make the [atomic] bomb, but at Oak Ridge they were trying to separate the isotopes of uranium -- uranium 238 and uranium 235, the explosive one. They were just beginning to get infinitesimal amounts from an experimental thing [isotope separation] of 235, and at the same time they were practicing the chemistry. There was going to be a big plant, they were going to have vats of the stuff, and then they were going to take the purified stuff and repurify and get it ready for the next stage. (You have to purify it in several stages.) So they were practicing on the one hand, and they were just getting a little bit of U235 from one of the pieces of apparatus experimentally on the other hand. And they were trying to learn how to assay it, to determine how much uranium 235 there is in it. Though we would send them instructions, they never got it right. So finally Emil Segr&eg
can cause confusion. This section introduces both terms, as well as providing a more formal introduction to the concept of residuals. Whether error or uncertainty is used, however, the primary aim of such discussion in analytical chemistry is analytical chemistry and quantitative analysis ebook to determine (a) how close a result is to the ‘true’ value (the analytical chemistry and quantitative analysis hage pdf accuracy) and (b) how well replicate values agree with one another (the precision). Tips & links: Skip to Types of analytical chemistry and quantitative analysis solutions manual pdf Error Skip to Error & Uncertainty Skip to Residuals Navigation: Introduction Bibliography Contact Info Copyright How to Use Concept Map Site Map Excel™ Basics Entering Data Formulas Plotting Functions Trendlines Basic Statistics Stats http://www.csudh.edu/oliver/che230/textbook/ch05.htm in Anal Chem Mean and Variance Error and Residuals Probability Confidence Levels Degrees of Freedom Linear Regression Calibration Correlation Linear Portions Regression Equation Regression Errors Using the Calibration Limits of Detection Outliers in Regression Evaluation & Comparison Hypotheses t-test 1- and 2-tailed Tests F-test Summary Quick Links: Site Map Concept Map Next Page Previous Page Next Topic Previous Topic Types of Error: In the preceding section, http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/coursenotes/analsci/stats/ErrorResid.html we noted how successive measurements of the same parameter, for the same sample and method, will result in a set of values which vary from the ‘true’ value by differing amounts. In other words, our measurements are subject to error. This is the principal reason why a result based on a single measurement is meaningless in scientific terms. Formally, the error is defined as the result of the measurement minus the true value, (xi−μ). Consequently, errors have both sign and units. Errors are further categorized in terms of their origin and effect on the measured result: Systematic errors are errors that always have the same magnitude and sign, resulting in a bias of the measured values from the true value. An example would be a ruler missing the first 1 mm of its length – it will consistently give lengths that are 1 mm too short. Systematic errors affect the accuracy of the final result. Random errors will have different magnitudes and signs, and result in a spread or dispersion of the measured values from the true value. An example would be any electronic measuring device – random electrical noise within its electronic components will cause
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 08 Oct 2016 23:06:03 GMT by s_ac5 (squid/3.5.20)
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 08 Oct 2016 23:06:03 GMT by s_ac5 (squid/3.5.20)