Bzr Error No Module Named Util.configobj
Assigned to Milestone QBzr Edit Fix Released Critical Alexander Belchenko Edit QBzr 0.20.1 You need to log in to change this bug's status. Affecting: QBzr Filed here by: Gary van der Merwe When: 2011-02-08 Confirmed: 2011-02-08 Assigned: 2011-02-11 Started work: 2011-02-11 Completed: 2011-02-11 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Elbuntu Guadalinex Guadalinex Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD Linux Tilix tuXlab Ubuntu Ubuntu Linaro Evaluation Build Ubuntu RTM Package (Find…) Project (Find…) Status Importance Milestone Fix Released Critical QBzr 0.20.1 Assigned to Me Alexander Belchenko (bialix) Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report Also affects project (?) Also affects distribution/package Nominate for series Bug Description In then debian bzr-2.3.0 package, bzrlib.util.configobj is removed with a patch. The qbzr debian package is patched to rather use pythons configobj, but if you install qbzr from source, it will show this error when you run it: bzr: ERROR: No module named configobj You may need to install this Python library separately. We should try import the python configobj first, and only use the bzrlib copy as a fall back. Add tags Tag help Related branches lp:qbzr/0.20 Gary van der Merwe (garyvdm) on 2011-02-08 summary: - No module named configobj error with debian bzr-2.3.0e+ No module named configobj error with debian bzr-2.3.0 summary: - No module named configobj error with debian bzr-2.3.0+ No module named configobj error with debian patched bzr-2.3.0 Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote on 2011-02-09: #1 I disagree. We should try to import copy from bzrlib first and only if it fails then use modules from python. Gary van der Merwe (garyvdm) wrote on 2011-02-09: Re: [Bug 715067] Re: No module named configobj error with debian patched bzr-2.3.0 #2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/02/2011 11:31, Alexander Belchenko wrote: > I disagree. We should try to import copy from bzrlib first and only if > it fails then use modules from python. For what reason? (Asking because I don't have a full understanding myself.) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAk1SYZoACgkQd/3EdwGKOh3afwCgtUwMHfUKNsMGhvC0tOV1RdNC EwcAl33o7MNy6ra7y3KD0peVYVvYHC0= =1S8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Alexander Belchenko (bialix) wrote on 2011-02-09: #3 Gary van der Merwe пишет: > On 09/02/2011
bzr-fastimport is src:bzr-fastimport. Reported by: Stefano Rivera Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:57:02 UTC Severity: important Found in version bzr-fastimport/0.9.0~bzr261-1 Fixed in version bzr-fastimport/0.9.0-1 Done: Jelmer Vernooij Bug is archived. No further changes may be made. Full log View this message in rfc822 format MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715067 Bug Tracking System) To: Jelmer Vernooij Subject: Bug#582519: marked as done (bzr: ERROR: No module named configobj (fixed in 0.9.0 upstream)) Message-ID: References: <20100521145318.GK6604@bach> X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 582519 X-Debian-PR-Package: bzr-fastimport X-Debian-PR-Source: bzr-fastimport Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:06:06 +0000 Content-Type: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582519;msg=7 multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1274457966-13792-0" [Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)] Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2010 16:02:09 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#582519: fixed in bzr-fastimport 0.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #582519, regarding bzr: ERROR: No module named configobj (fixed in 0.9.0 upstream) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 582519: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582519 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with proble
bzr-fastimport is src:bzr-fastimport. Reported by: Stefano Rivera Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:57:02 UTC Severity: important Found in version https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582519;msg=9 bzr-fastimport/0.9.0~bzr261-1 Fixed in version bzr-fastimport/0.9.0-1 Done: Jelmer Vernooij Bug is archived. No further changes may be made. Full log View this message in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5128845/importerror-no-module-named-ssl rfc822 format MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Stefano Rivera Subject: Bug#582519 closed bzr error by Jelmer Vernooij (Bug#582519: fixed in bzr-fastimport 0.9.0-1) Message-ID: References: <20100521145318.GK6604@bach> X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed 582519 X-Debian-PR-Package: bzr-fastimport X-Debian-PR-Source: bzr-fastimport Reply-To: 582519@bugs.debian.org Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:06:06 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1274457966-13792-1" [Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)] This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report bzr error no which was filed against the bzr-fastimport package: #582519: bzr: ERROR: No module named configobj (fixed in 0.9.0 upstream) It has been closed by Jelmer Vernooij . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Jelmer Vernooij by replying to this email. -- 582519: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582519 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems [Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)] From: Jelmer Vernooij To: 582519-close@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#582519: fixed in bzr-fastimport 0.9.0-1 Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:02:09 +0000 Source: bzr-fastimport Source-Version: 0.9.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bzr-fastimport, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bzr-fastimport_0.9.0-1.debian.tar.gz to main/b/bzr-fastimport/bzr-fastimport_0.9.0-1.debian.tar.gz bzr-fastimport_0.9.0-1.dsc to main/b/bzr-fastimport/bzr-fastimport_0.9.0-1.dsc bzr-fastimport_0.9.0-1_all.deb to main/b/bzr-fastimport/bzr-fastimport_0.9.0-1_all.deb bzr-fastimport_0.9.0.orig.tar.gz to main/b/bzr-fast
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up ImportError: No module named _ssl up vote 20 down vote favorite 8 Ubuntu Maverick w/Python 2.7: I can't figure out what to do to resolve the following import error: >>> import ssl Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/ssl.py", line 60, in import _ssl # if we can't import it, let the error propagate ImportError: No module named _ssl UPDATE: I recompiled the source. I was unable to figure out how to add the --with-ssl option the answers below mention, instead I got this to work by editing the lines regarding SSL in /Modules/Setup.dist. python python-2.7 share|improve this question edited Mar 27 '11 at 4:43 waiwai933 4,959124774 asked Feb 26 '11 at 18:21 J Cooper 2,81712136 1 Hi...I am facing the same problem...can you please point out what did you edit in Setup.dist –g4ur4v Mar 2 '14 at 19:42 Once J Cooper not shared his solution, I found one. webtop.com.au/blog/… –André Duarte May 22 '15 at 12:06 Since --with-ssl is not recognized anymore I just installed the libssl-dev: sudo apt-get install libssl-dev –SSchneid Jun 15 at 7:15 add a comment| 8 Answers 8 active oldest votes up vote 8 down vote accepted Did you build the Python from source? If so, you need the --with-ssl option while building. share|improve this answer answered Feb 26 '11 at 18:28 utku.zih 2,79421741 2 I can't remember if I built from source or not. when do I add the --with-ssl? the ./configure, make, or make install step. when I added this to ./configure it said --with-ssl option was not recognized –J Cooper Feb 26 '11 at 18:43 It's an option to configure. In general, configuration options, compile-time-switches, and the like, are options to configure -- what it actually does is run over many of the source files, making text substitutions (and often creating new header files), before build time. –jelford Jan 7 '12 at 9