C Error Checking
Contents |
C - Basic Syntax C - Data Types C - Variables C - Constants C - Storage Classes C - Operators C - Decision Making C - Loops C - Functions C - exception handling in c Scope Rules C - Arrays C - Pointers C - Strings C - error checking c drive Structures C - Unions C - Bit Fields C - Typedef C - Input & Output C - File I/O C c atoi error checking - Preprocessors C - Header Files C - Type Casting C - Error Handling C - Recursion C - Variable Arguments C - Memory Management C - Command Line Arguments C Programming Resources C - error checking in c programming Questions & Answers C - Quick Guide C - Useful Resources C - Discussion Selected Reading Developer's Best Practices Questions and Answers Effective Resume Writing HR Interview Questions Computer Glossary Who is Who C - Error Handling Advertisements Previous Page Next Page As such, C programming does not provide direct support for error handling but being a system programming language, it provides you access at lower level in the
Objective C Error Handling
form of return values. Most of the C or even Unix function calls return -1 or NULL in case of any error and set an error code errno. It is set as a global variable and indicates an error occurred during any function call. You can find various error codes defined in
known as exception handling). By convention, the programmer is expected to prevent errors from occurring in the first place, and test return values
C Error Handling Goto
from functions. For example, -1 and NULL are used in several functions objective c error handling best practices such as socket() (Unix socket programming) or malloc() respectively to indicate problems that the programmer should be cocoa error handling aware about. In a worst case scenario where there is an unavoidable error and no way to recover from it, a C programmer usually tries to log the error https://www.tutorialspoint.com/cprogramming/c_error_handling.htm and "gracefully" terminate the program. There is an external variable called "errno", accessible by the programs after including
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/116576/how-can-i-improve-my-error-checking-and-handling us Programmers Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Programmers Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional programmers interested in conceptual questions about software development. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top How can I improve my error checking and handling? up vote 12 down vote favorite Lately I have been struggling to c error understand what the right amount of checking is and what the proper methods are. I have a few questions regarding this: What is the proper way to check for errors (bad input, bad states, etc)? Is it better to explicitly check for errors, or use functions like asserts which can be optimized out of your final code? I feel like explicitly checking clutters a program with a lot of extra code which shouldn't be executed in most situations anyway-- and not to mention c error handling most errors end up with an abort/exit failure. Why clutter a function with explicit checks just to abort? I have looked for asserts versus explicit checking of errors and found little to truly explain when to do either. Most say 'use asserts to check for logic errors and use explicit checks to check for other failures.' This doesn't seem to get us very far though. Would we say this is feasible: Malloc returning null, check explictly API user inserting odd input for functions, use asserts Would this make me any better at error checking? What else can I do? I really want to improve and write better, 'professional' code. c testing assertions share|improve this question asked Oct 27 '11 at 15:50 Corey 215129 migrated from stackoverflow.com Oct 27 '11 at 16:16 This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers. 3 Good question, but I think it might be better suited for one of the sister sites (programmers?). –user786653 Oct 27 '11 at 15:58 Thanks, I wasn't sure. I thought since it was pretty code-related SO would have been alright. –Corey Oct 27 '11 at 16:22 3 The simple answer is "This is why exceptions were invented. Get a better language." –DeadMG Oct 27 '11 at 16:42 1 @DeadMG: setjmp/longjmp are available in C, so you don't need a new language. –user786653 Oct 27 '11 at 17:05 3 @DeadMG: Someone who cannot get C error checking right has