Crc16 Error
Contents |
updated April 4, 2003 Style Notes Addendum — added April 4, 2003 (perhaps a little less confrontational than other sections) Addendum #2 — added July 4, 2003 — ITU/CCITT publications and “the” CRC16-CCITT Document Original This page was originally available as http://www.joegeluso.com/software/articles/ccitt.htm, crc16 calculator but has since disappeared. The Internet Archive Wayback Machine was used to retrieve the
Crc-16
latest version before it disappeared. Overview This page presents accurate implementations (long-hand and programmed) of the 16-bit CRC-CCITT specification, which is: Width cyclic redundancy check error = 16 bits Truncated polynomial = 0x1021 Initial value = 0xFFFF Input data is NOT reflected Output CRC is NOT reflected No XOR is performed on the output CRC A C-language program is included which crc error detection produces CRC values which conform to this specification. The program also includes a routine which demonstrates how an incorrect “check value” which has been found on the web may be generated. General Why yet another document on calculating CRCs? Because this one: Indicates that some common implementations of the 16-bit CRC-CCITT may produce incorrect values. Provides source code for the 16-bit CRC-CCITT without using tables or reversed polynomials. The program
Crc Calculation Example
below implements the concepts presented in the first 8 sections of “A Painless Guide to CRC Error Detection Algorithms” by Ross Williams. Things become significantly more complex in progressing beyond section 8 of that document. If a table-driven implementation of the 16-bit CRC-CCITT is to be developed, a solid reference is needed to ensure that it is working correctly. The source code in this document may fill that role. Important features of a standard CRC are that it: Can be used to validate data Is reproducible by others The first feature above is easy to realize in a closed system if corruption of data is infrequent (but substantial when it occurs). The term “closed system” refers to a situation where the CRC need not be communicated to others. A correct implementation of a 16-bit CRC will detect a change in a single bit in a message of over 8000 bytes. An erroneous CRC implementation may not be able to detect such subtle errors. If errors are usually both rare and large (affecting several bits), then a faulty 16-bit CRC implementation may still be adequate in a closed system. The second feature above — that the CRC is reproducible by others — is crucial in an open system; that is,
from GoogleSign inHidden fieldsSearch for groups or messages
Wi-Fi 802.11n Wi-Fi with MCU Automotive Wi-Fi Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) All Wireless Devices MCU and PSoC Families Traveo 32-bit ARM Automotive MCUs FM4 32-bit ARM Cortex MCUs PSoC 32-bit ARM Cortex MCUs PSoC 8-bit MCUs 16-bit and http://www.cypress.com/forum/usb-30-super-speed/crc-16-error 8-bit MCUs PSoCĀ® Software All FM and PSoC MCUs Touch Sensing (CapSense) CapSense Controllers TrueTouch Fingerprint Reader Universal Serial Bus (USB) USB Type-C and Power Delivery USB SuperSpeed Hubs USB https://www.embeddedrelated.com/showthread/comp.arch.embedded/125509-1.php SuperSpeed Peripherals USB Hi-Speed Hubs USB Hi-Speed Peripherals All USB Devices Power Management ICs Energy Harvesting PMICs Automotive LED Drivers Automotive PMICs Standard PMICs LED Lighting Driver ICs Voltage Supervisor cyclic redundancy ICs Battery Charger ICs Easy DesignSim Memory Serial NOR Flash Parallel NOR Flash HyperFlash HyperRAM SLC NAND Flash Nonvolatile RAM Asynchronous SRAM Synchronous SRAM All Memory Devices Clocks & Buffers Interface Applications Internet of Things (IoT) Aerospace & Defense Automotive Solutions CapSense for Automotive Infotainment Applications CapSense for Automotive non-infotainment applications Motor Control HVAC Passive Keyless Entry Switch Touch screen and cyclic redundancy check track pad solutions for Automotive Infotainment applications Ultrasonic Parking Assistance System Home Appliance Induction Cooker Espresso Machine Microwave HEMS Controller Medical Infusion Pump Fertility Monitor Blood Pressure Monitor Blood Glucose Meter Pulse Oximeter Consumer Electronics Power Bank LED Projector 3D Active Shutter Glasses iPod, iPhone and iPad Accessories USB 3.0 HD Video Streaming Wearables Fitness Monitor Communications & Telecom Smart Meter Power Supervision CFP Management Interface Thermal Management Industrial Brushless DC Motor (BLDC) Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Stepper FA (Inverter) FA (PLC) Magnetic Card Reader Temperature Sensing & Control Wireless RF Remote Control Wireless HID R/C Models and Toys Wi-Fi Over The Air Reference Design Design Support Support Cypress Developer Community WICED IoT Community Customer Support Create a Support Case Knowledge Base Sales Offices Customer Care Competitor Cross Reference Design Partners WICED IoT Partners Report a Website Problem Training Design Workshops Video Tutorials Events University Alliance Video Library Blogs Quality Quality and Reliability Packaging Product Change Notices RoHS Compliance Software & Tools Software and Drivers Code Examples WICED Software PSoC Creator EZ-USB FX3 SDK Development Kits Reference designs Documentation Doc
PCs running 64-bit Windows, complemented by a separate scheduler on multicore multiprocessors, can deliver real-time performance on software-defined peripheralsView Forums comp.arch.embedded error detection rate with crc-16 CCITT Started by Shane williams ●March 27, 2011 ChronologicalNewest First Hi We're using the 68302 micro with DDCMP serial protocol over two wire RS485. According to the user manual, this uses CRC16-CCITT - X**16 X**12 X**5 + 1. Does anyone have any idea what the chance of getting an undetected error is with this protocol? I know all single bit errors are detected. Supposing we run a point to point connection at slightly faster than it's really capable of and we get 10% of messages with more than a single bit error. What percentage of these will go undetected by the CRC check? Suppose we run the connection at a "normal" baud rate with almost no errors. What is the likelihood of getting undetected errors now? Thanks for any help. Reply Posted by Rich Webb ●March 27, 2011On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 01:58:32 -0700 (PDT), Shane williams