Divide By Zero Or Overflow Error Windows
Contents |
by 0" or "Divide Overflow" error messages. The divide error messages are caused when the computer or software attempts run divide by zero error sql a process that attempts to perform a mathematical division by zero, which divide by zero error java is an illegal operation. This error message could also be caused by a computer or software limitation or
Divide By Zero Error Encountered
conflict with computer memory. Improper calculation If you or the program you are using performs a calculation in any program and experience a divide error, ensure that the calculation being
Excel Divide By Zero Error Hide
performed is possible. Some programs are not capable of verifying the accuracy of a calculation and may perform an illegal instruction. Programs such as Microsoft Excel, will generate a #DIV!0 error indicating the formula or calculation is invalid, or you are attempting to divide by zero. Hardware or software incompatibility This issue can occur if software is being run on divide by zero error encountered in stored procedure a computer that has hardware that is incompatible with the software. For example, this issue may occur with restore software designed for a specific computer and is being run on another computer or on the correct computer that has added hardware within it. Make sure all software installed on the computer is up to date and fully compatible with the system. Driver issue If you are encountering a divide error while using Windows, make sure you are running the latest drivers and software for all component hardware devices. Verify the video card, sound card, network card and modem drivers on the computer. You can find a listing of computer drivers on our driver page. Software issue If the divide error happens while in a game or program and the above recommendations does not resolve your issue, verify all software patches and upgrades have been obtained and applied. Also, verify no other program is running in the background that could be causing your problem by End Tasking all background programs and TSRs. External cache or 2nd level cache If yo
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack
Divide By Zero Error Encountered. In Sql Server
Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us divide by zero error encountered in sql server 2012 Super User Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and divide by zero error encountered. the statement has been terminated power users. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top MS-DOS “Divide http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000396.htm Overflow” error up vote 1 down vote favorite When I attempt an installation of an application in MS-DOS, I receive the following error: "Divide Overflow." What is the meaning of this error and how do I fix it? The install procedure is: Partition my HDD Format C drive Install MS-DOS 4 Add the flowing lines to config.sys DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS DEVICE=C:\DOS\EMM386.EXE RAM DEVICE=C:\DOS\RAMDRIVE.SYS 6000 512 64 /e Insert my floppy application and then restart http://superuser.com/questions/409259/ms-dos-divide-overflow-error It works properly the Virtual machine Q emulator but I receive a "Divide Overflow" error on the real machine (Vectra HP PC). ms-dos share|improve this question edited Apr 6 '12 at 15:52 slhck 125k38312360 asked Apr 6 '12 at 10:32 repozitor 3114 There is probably a timing loop somewhere in the code, and your new[er] machine is way faster than it ever expected, generating a divide-by-zero error. What application is it? Do you have the source code? –Cody Gray Aug 17 '14 at 9:27 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote You have a lot of options. FreeDOS:Instead of installing MsDos, install that one Emulator on the machine: Istead of installing it on a virtual machine, do it on the real one. DosBOX: Istead of using Q emulator, use DosBOX, multi-platform, and works like a charm on any machine. share|improve this answer answered Apr 6 '12 at 14:28 TweakFix 46125 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote I'm not sure how old this system is, but it may have subtle incompatibilites in the chipset that cause it not to really be compatible with DOS or all DOS applications. It's also possible there's a newer CPU feature that is causing an issue. It could b
WindowsWindows 10 Windows Server 2012 Windows Server 2008 Windows Server 2003 Windows 8 Windows 7 Windows Vista Windows XP http://windowsitpro.com/hardware/foxpro-windows-problems Exchange ServerExchange Server 2013 Exchange Server 2010 Exchange Server 2007 Exchange Server 2003 Outlook Unified Communications/Lync SharePoint Virtualization Cloud Systems ManagementSystem Center PowerShell & Scripting Active http://forums.windrivers.com/showthread.php?25687-Divide-by-0-or-overflow-error-duing-clean-install-of-Win-95 Directory & Group Policy Mobile Networking Storage TrainingOnline Training IT/Dev Connections Webcasts VIP Library Digital Magazine Archives InfoCentersIT Innovators Mobile Computing Business Now Desktop VDI All About divide by Converged Architecture Advertisement Home > Hardware > FoxPro for Windows Problems FoxPro for Windows Problems Feb 3, 2000 David Carroll | Windows IT Pro EMAIL Tweet Comments 14 Advertisement Our bank is running a Microsoft FoxPro for Windows custom application, and the performance is awful. We have to try several times before the divide by zero application will start. We also get a Divide-by-Zero/Overflow error. We found foxpfix.exe, and it's enabled. FoxPro for Windows doesn't perform like a true Windows application because it doesn't use the basic Windows API. It acts more like a 16-bit DOS application. You can use Citrix's foxpfix.exe utility to fix some of the graphics problems, but you still need to tame foxr.exe using application tuning. Foxpfix.exe is enabled by default, but I find that it's often better to disable it. Here are some tips for tuning the application. You'll need to use Performance Monitor to adjust these hexadecimal numbers according to your needs, but the settings are usually close for most applications. Using regedt32.exe, create the subkey HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Windows NT/CurrentVersion/Terminal Server/Compatibility/Applications/foxr With a "d word," create the values Flags = 0 x C FirstCountMsqQPeeksSleepBadApp = 1F MsgQBadAppSleepTimeInMillisec = 0 x 1 Nthcountmsgqpeeksleepbadapp = F One mistake I've seen is that people tune the compiled application name (e.g., account.exe) instea
of Win 95 If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Results 1 to 7 of 7 Thread: Divide by 0 or overflow error duing clean install of Win 95 Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode October 13th, 1999,08:32 AM #1 TangleWeb View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date May 1999 Location Raleigh, NC Posts 482 Divide by 0 or overflow error duing clean install of Win 95 I am attempting to install Windows 95 ver 950B on an AST Adventure 4066D. This machine is based on the AMD 486DX-2 66 MHz chip, has 32 MB EDO RAM & 1 GB Hard Drive. No Secondary Cache. I have FDISK'd & Formatted clean 3 times. I get through the setup wizard, but when it begins to copy files, I get the Divide by 0, or Overflow error message. I find no direct reference to it when I search MS Knowledge Base. I could sure use some help on this one! I'm going to try 98 just for comparison. ------------------ Dave Reply With Quote October 13th, 1999,08:56 AM #2 TangleWeb View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date May 1999 Location Raleigh, NC Posts 482 Additional info. I FDISK'd and formatted again and tried Windows 98. Got same error message. "System Error Divide by Zero or Overflow Error" ------------------ Dave Reply With Quote October 13th, 1999,09:51 AM #3 TangleWeb View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date May 1999 Location Raleigh, NC Posts 482 OOPS! Sorry, it has a "CYRIX" 486DX-2 66 MHz chip, NOT AMD... ------------------ Dave Reply With Quote October 13th, 1999,11:06 AM #4 bdunn View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date Nov 1998 Location New York, NY Posts 376 I've seen this before. try running setup from the command line and turn off all the options /is /iq ...etc. It should help Reply With Quote October 13th, 1999,11:17 AM #5 TangleWeb View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date May 1999 Location Raleigh, NC Posts 482 BDunn Thanks for reply! I am running install from the prompt, as it's a clean install. Please list syntax to turn off all options. I copied entire contents of Win95 Dir.