Home > dma read > dma read error occurred at sector

Dma Read Error Occurred At Sector

Contents

17:24:29HDD-0 Controller........................PASSED HDD-0 Funnel smartctl read failure Seek....................... Seek error occurred at sector 870549212. (Reason: HBA Taskfile Error) Model: error unc at lba SAMSUNG HM500JI / SN: S208JDQZ308902 / Rev: 2AC101C4HDD-0 Funnel Seek.......................FAILED 01/03/2014 17:26HDD-0 Random Seek.......................PASSED HDD-0 Linear Verify..................... Read verify error

Badblocks Linux

occurred at sector 2048. (Reason: HBA Taskfile Error) Model: SAMSUNG HM500JI / SN: S208JDQZ308902 / Rev: 2AC101C4HDD-0 Linear Verify.....................FAILED 01/03/2014 17:27HDD-0 Random Verify..................... Read verify error occurred at sector 807428141. (Reason: HBA Taskfile Error) Model: SAMSUNG HM500JI / SN: S208JDQZ308902 / Rev: 2AC101C4HDD-0 Random Verify.....................FAILED 01/03/2014 17:28HDD-0 SMART Status Check................ SMART operations are not enabled. Model: SAMSUNG HM500JI / SN: S208JDQZ308902 / Rev: 2AC101C4HDD-0 SMART Status Check................FAILED 01/03/2014 17:28HDD-0 SMART Self-Test Short............. SMART operations are not enabled. Model: SAMSUNG HM500JI / SN: S208JDQZ308902 / Rev: 2AC101C4HDD-0 SMART Self-Test Short.............FAILED 01/03/2014 17:29HDD-0 SMART Attribute Check.............PASSED HDD-0 Inner/Outer Read Surface Scan..... DMA read error occurred at sector 2064. (Reason: HBA Taskfile Error) Model: SAMSUNG HM500JI / SN: S208JDQZ308902 / Rev: 2AC101C4HDD-0 Inner/Outer Read Surface Scan.....FAILED 01/03/2014 17:30HDD-0 Read Surface Scan................. DMA read error occurred at sector 2064. (Reason: HBA Taskfile Error) Model: SAMSUNG HM500JI / SN: S208JDQZ308902 / Rev: 2AC101C4HDD-0 Read Surface Scan.................FAILED 01/03/2014 17:31HDD-0 Spin Down/Spin Up Test............PASSED Hardware Monitoring..................... L

here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Unix & Linux Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. http://www.pcdoctor-community.com/forum/index.php?topic=783.0;wap2 Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Does my hard-drive have bad sectors or not? up vote 6 down vote favorite 3 I got a new drive and I'm confused if smartctl detects bad http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/113737/does-my-hard-drive-have-bad-sectors-or-not sectors or not. Both short and extended self-tests completed without error. But the Error Log indicates Uncorrectable error in data for 96 sectors. Here's the smartctl output: smartctl 5.41 2011-06-09 r3365 [i686-linux-3.2.0-52-generic] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: Hitachi Deskstar T7K500 Device Model: Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 Serial Number: VFL104R73X993Z LU WWN Device Id: 5 000cca 316f723ca Firmware Version: V5DOA73A User Capacity: 250,059,350,016 bytes [250 GB] Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: 7 ATA Standard is: ATA/ATAPI-7 T13 1532D revision 1 Local Time is: Wed Feb 5 19:19:29 2014 UTC SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x80) Offline data collection activity was never started. Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled. Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed without error or no self-test has ever been run

instructions: Windows Mac Red Hat Linux Ubuntu Click URL instructions: Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here → (This may not be possible with some types of ads) More information about https://sourceforge.net/p/smartmontools/mailman/smartmontools-support/thread/4B01071C-9080-484A-93F8-3BC2CF7FC9BA@geoffk.org/ our ad policies X You seem to have CSS turned off. Please don't fill out this field. You seem to have CSS turned off. Please don't fill out this field. Briefly describe the problem (required): Upload screenshot of ad (required): Select a file, or drag & drop file here. ✔ ✘ Please provide the ad click URL, if possible: Home Browse S.M.A.R.T. Monitoring Tools Mailing dma read Lists S.M.A.R.T. Monitoring Tools Disk Inspection and Monitoring Brought to you by: ballen4705, chrfranke, dipohl Summary Files Reviews Support Wiki Mailing Lists News Code smartmontools-announce smartmontools-database smartmontools-support smartmontools-support [smartmontools-support] disappearing extended self tests & other errors From: Dr. Clea F. Rees - 2010-07-01 19:26:05 If my question is already answered somewhere, my apologies and I'd be grateful for a pointer. I did go through the dma read error FAQ and search the archives but I wasn't certain which search terms to use so may well have missed something. I've had smartmontools monitoring one disk for sometime. I would occasionally see transient errors. For example, very occasionally, a self test would fail but later self tests would pass. Earlier this week, I started to see a rising number of bad ("pending") sectors and a large number of reallocation attempts. No reallocated sectors, though, and zero "offline uncorrectable". The raw read error rate fluctuates wildly and I can't remember if this happened before or not. It might be in the thousands one moment and 0 a few minutes later. I also saw repeated self test failures (although some passed). This is a Mac, so I ran Apple's hardware tests from the install disk. Initially, I got an error but hadn't realised I should have removed all peripherals so I did that and the error disappeared. I repeated the extended test three times without finding any problems. I was also seeing fsck errors but repeated iterations seemed to resolve them. In addition, I got two I/O errors when cloning to an external drive and the s

 

Related content

No related pages.