Puppet Duplicate Definition Error

QueryOpen cron issuesPlatform Report - 2 Week ActivityPuppet Solaris issuesRuby 1.9 IssuesSupport Customer TicketsSupport TicketsTelly DeprecationsTickets - Assigned to puppet duplicate declaration is already declared in file MeTickets - Authored by MeTickets - By PriorityTickets - In

Puppet Error 400 On Server Duplicate Declaration

Topic Branch Pending ReviewTickets - Top by votesTickets - Unassigned to a target releaseTickets - UnreviewedTickets

Puppet Duplicate Declaration File

- unreviewed and outside SLATickets - waiting for actionTickets with simple fixes Watchers (8) Paul BerryJos BoumansStefan GoethalsMichael KnoxRadosław AntoniukDamion AlexanderEric PrattJohn Julien The Puppet Labs

Puppet Duplicate Declaration Class

Issue Tracker has Moved: https://tickets.puppetlabs.com This issue tracker is now in read-only archive mode and automatic ticket export has been disabled. Redmine users will need to create a new JIRA account to file tickets using https://tickets.puppetlabs.com. See the following page for information on filing tickets with JIRA: The Puppet Projects Workflow describes puppet define duplicate declaration how to file tickets against Puppet projects. Bug #5447 Fix duplicate definition error Added by Matt Robinson over 5 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago. Status:DuplicateStart date:12/02/2010Priority:NormalDue date:Assignee:James Turnbull% Done:0%Category:parserTarget version:- Affected Puppet version:2.7.6 Branch: Keywords:parameterized_classes We've Moved! Ticket tracking is now hosted in JIRA: https://tickets.puppetlabs.com Description Jos Boumans reported a manifest that results in the following error: Duplicate definition: Class[Kbase] is already defined; cannot redefine at /Users/matthewrobinson/work/puppet/4792:5 on node mattmac.puppetlabs.lan He thought this was related to ticket 4792 and thus reopened it, but it appears to be a separate issue. He posted his full set of manifests on that ticket, but we reduced that to a much smaller manifest that reproduces the problem: class { "s_riak": } class s_riak inherits kbase { } class { "kbase": } class kbase { } Note that no external node classification or anything fancy was involved, you should be able to reproduce the error on this manif

QueryOpen cron issuesPlatform Report - 2 Week ActivityPuppet Solaris issuesRuby 1.9 IssuesSupport puppet notify Customer TicketsSupport TicketsTelly DeprecationsTickets - Assigned to MeTickets puppet file - Authored by MeTickets - By PriorityTickets - In Topic Branch Pending ReviewTickets - Top by votesTickets - Unassigned to a target releaseTickets - UnreviewedTickets - unreviewed and outside SLATickets - waiting for actionTickets with simple https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5447 fixes Watchers (4) Chuck SchweizerStefan GoethalsPaul BerryJos Boumans The Puppet Labs Issue Tracker has Moved: https://tickets.puppetlabs.com This issue tracker is now in read-only archive mode and automatic ticket export has been disabled. Redmine users will need to create a new JIRA account to file tickets https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4792 using https://tickets.puppetlabs.com. See the following page for information on filing tickets with JIRA: The Puppet Projects Workflow describes how to file tickets against Puppet projects. Bug #4792 Duplicate definition since 2.6.1 upgrade Added by James Turnbull over 5 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago. Status:ClosedStart date:09/17/2010Priority:HighDue date:Assignee:Radosław Antoniuk% Done:100%Category:parserTarget version:- Affected Puppet version:2.7.5 Branch:http://github.com/stereotype441/puppet/tree/ticket/2.6.x/4792 Keywords: customer We've Moved! Ticket tracking is now hosted in JIRA: https://tickets.puppetlabs.com Description Class, users::virtual which has all the user{} statements for all users. Then have classes like users::cms and users::developers that inherit users::virtual and then realize some of the users. This all worked perfectly fine in 2.5 but since 2.6.1 runs now fail with: err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Duplicate definition: User[apen ney] is already defined in file /etc/puppet/modules/testing/users/manifests

here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14736168/puppet-error-duplicate-definition Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a https://ask.puppet.com/question/2354/duplicate-declaration-error-occured-even-if-i-use-ensure_resource/ community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Puppet Error: Duplicate definition up vote 0 down vote favorite In a class I would duplicate declaration like to do this: stop a service reinstall a package start the previous service again Here is my class: class MyClass{ service{"ServiceName-start": name => "ServiceName", ensure => "stopped", } package{"PackageName": ensure => "installed", require => Service["ServiceName-Start"], } service{"ServiceName-Stop": name => "ServiceName", ensure => "running", require => Package["PackageName"] } } I got this error: Duplicate definition: Service[ServiceName] is already defined in file /puppet/mycsass.pp at line 2; cannot redefine at /puppet/myclass.pp:9 ruby puppet duplicate declaration puppet share|improve this question edited Feb 6 '13 at 18:54 sunnyrjuneja 4,3581643 asked Feb 6 '13 at 18:26 icn 4,2792373115 I have no idea what puppet is; however, looking at the structure of MyClass, is the error due to the "ServiceName-start" and "ServiceName-Stop" services having the same name => "ServiceName"? –Metro Smurf Feb 6 '13 at 18:37 Yes, I would like the same service stop first and start later –icn Feb 6 '13 at 18:38 Also, should require => Service["ServiceNameStart"], be require => Service["ServiceName-start"],? –Metro Smurf Feb 6 '13 at 18:38 @MetroSmurf Puppet is a deployment orchestration... thing. I'm guessing that the OP wants to execute a sequence of actions, but is instead just defining the structure of something. A proper answer here would be pointing at the mechanism on sequencing actions in puppet I'm guessing, not rephrasing the error output –millimoose Feb 6 '13 at 18:39 @MetroSmurf Thanks for the catch :). But it doesn't help the error –icn Feb 6 '13 at 18:39 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be as simple as you'd like. Here's a brief explanation of the problem in the Pupp

occured, even if I use ensure_resource. edit asked 2013-08-04 19:49:45 -0500 cynipe 21 ●1 ●1 ●4 updated 2013-08-04 19:52:14 -0500 I'm wondering that why duplicate declaration error occured. Suppose I have following statements which could be solve a duplication error: if ! defined(Package['libxslt']) { package {'libxslt': ensure => present, } } or include stdlib ensure_packages(['libxslt']) Then, include class that contains package libxslt. Any idea? edit retag flag offensive close merge delete add a comment 2 answers Sort by » oldest newest most voted 4 answered 2013-08-07 06:31:01 -0500 nibalizer 436 ●4 ●12 ●17 updated 2013-08-07 06:41:01 -0500 What you're essentially doing here is trying to use the defined() function to evade duplicate definition errors. This kind of check-first, then-do programming isn't going to work very well in Puppet because evaluation order in Puppet is random. What you're actually trying to do, I think, is to manage packages on your system. Specifically, you want to manage trivial packages. That is, packages that don't have to be installed in any order, no special options, no dependent resources. Everyone eventually ends up here, it seems. There are just long-ish lists of packages that you want to ... (more) edit flag offensive delete link more Commentssorry for being late, and thank you very much for your detailed explanation. I will look into puppet-module-singleton. Thank you!!cynipe( 2013-08-29 03:15:24 -0500 )editedit: didn't read the question first, only the answer. Most of this comment is irrelevant. Carry on, nothing to see here. :-). This is exactly what I was looking for ...(more)reidmv( 2014-01-07 11:34:55 -0500 )editUnless I'm missing something here, doesn't the singleton option require that all modules on the system use the singleton module? My initial experimentation seems to indicate that. I ...(more)mfrisch@univa.com( 2014-02-07 13:04:35 -0500 )editadd a comment 1 answered 2013-08-06 21:52:54 -0500 GregLarkin 4842 ●5 ●17 ●62 http://www.puppet.com/ Please check the reference for the defined function here. In particular, the documentation states: Resource declarations are checked using resource references, e.g. defined( File['/tmp/myfile'] ). Checking whether a given resource has been declared is, unfortunately, dependent on the parse order of the configuration... The example given in the documentation is almost identical to the