Package Amsmath Error Erroneous Nesting
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack
Arrhenius Equation Chemistry
Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us align equation left latex Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a
Align Equation Latex
community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up “Erroneous nesting of equation structures” in using “\begin{align}” in a multi-line equation in rmarkdown to knit+pandoc erroneous equation chemistry pdf up vote 8 down vote favorite 1 I am writing some multi-line equations in R Markdown - LaTeX, using auto-numbering and \begin{align}. Here's a working the example: --- title: "test" output: html_document --- (@eq01) $$ \begin{align} y = x^2 \\ y = x^3 \\ y = \sqrt[2]{x} \end{align} $$ This works great when the output is html_document. Here's the result: But when I change the output document to pdf: output: large parentheses latex pdf_document I get the following error (I am using RStudio latest Version 0.98.1056): I've been trying to read the documentation as suggested in the error message, but I do not seem to get a handle on it. I've checked Stack Overflow and Google and although there are some related posts/questions (for example here, here, here), none of them solve the problem (or apply to my problem). I've also tried to tweak everything. The most evident solution would be to get rid of the \begin{align} environment, (@eq01) $$ y = x^2 \\ y = x^3 \\ y = \sqrt[2]{x} $$ but it does not work for two reasons. First, the html version does not work as nicely because the auto-numbering does not appear centered in the multi-line equation, but rather on the first line (and I don't like it like that). Second, although the pdf version in this case does compile and produce the pdf, it does not recognize that it is a multi-line equation (it's like it does not recognize the new line command \). Any ideas are really appreciated. I've been struggling with this for a while and I cannot find a solution. I kinda love R Markdown because it really integrates the analysis with writing and communicating in a
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us TeX
Multiline Equation Latex
- LaTeX Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a online latex question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top How to show two groups of equations side by side: one implies the other? up vote 11 down vote favorite 4 I would like to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26049762/erroneous-nesting-of-equation-structures-in-using-beginalign-in-a-multi-l show a bunch of equations can imply another bunch of equations, with double right arrow in between. Here are two trials of mine: one is to use another level of math mode to enclose the two groups of equations, and the other is to use a table with each group of equation being in a cell. The first one $$ \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) -\mu X^{-1} e + A(x) \lambda - z = 0, \\ c(x) = 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/34749/how-to-show-two-groups-of-equations-side-by-side-one-implies-the-other \\ z > 0 \end{align*} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) + A(x) \lambda - 2z = 0, \\ c(x) = 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 \\ z > 0 \\ \end{align*} $$ This one will leads to error amsmath: Erroneous nesting of equation structures;(amsmath) trying to recover with `aligned'. \end{align*} Another is using tabular: \begin{tabular*}{c c c} \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) -\mu X^{-1} e + A(x) \lambda - z = 0, \\ c(x) = 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 \\ z > 0 \end{align*} & $\Longrightarrow$ & \begin{align*} \nabla f(x) + A(x) \lambda - 2z = 0, \\ c(x) = 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z = 0, \\ x > 0 \\ z > 0 \\ \end{align*} \end{tabular*} It doesn't compile either. I wonder how to make the two approaches workable, and if there are other better ways? equations amsmath share|improve this question edited Nov 14 '11 at 5:39 lockstep 161k38486646 asked Nov 14 '11 at 2:10 Tim 2,20872545 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 10 down vote accepted Here is another approach, with some braces added to "combine" the separate equation sets. Of course, these can be removed if needed. Each equation set is aligned along the binary relations in an rcl (right-center-left) fashion with the appropriate spacing. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath}% http://ctan.org/pkg/amsmath \begin{document} \begin{align*} \left.\begin{array}{r@{\mskip\thickmuskip}l} \nabla f(x) -\mu X^{-1} e + A(x) \lambda - z &= 0, \\ c(x) &= 0, \\ -\mu X^{-1} e + z &= 0, \\ x &
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 327 Star 7,339 Fork 941 jgm/pandoc Code Issues 441 Pull requests 32 Projects 0 Wiki Pulse Graphs New issue Error in converting `align` environment equations enclosed in https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/3059 `$$` #3059 Closed pkjkrai66 opened this Issue Aug 6, 2016 · 1 comment Projects None yet Labels None yet Milestone No milestone Assignees No one assigned 2 participants pkjkrai66 commented Aug 6, 2016 markdown https://groups.google.com/d/topic/pandoc-discuss/bW9DW5nQy50 strictly requires all equations to be enclosed in $$ but align environment equations does not require to be enclosed in $$...$$ in LaTeX. If I try to convert a .md file (Conmmand: pandoc test1.md -s -o test1.pdf) equation chemistry containing align environment formula enclosed in $$, I recieve the following error: ! Package amsmath Error: Erroneous nesting of equation structures; (amsmath) trying to recover with `aligned'. See the amsmath package documentation for explanation. Type H
GoogleВойтиСкрытые поляПоиск групп или сообщений