303 Error Page
Contents |
referer DNT X-Forwarded-For Status codes 301 Moved Permanently 302 Found 303 See Other 403 Forbidden 404 Not Found 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons v t e This is a list of Hypertext
303 Error Hard Drive
Transfer Protocol (HTTP) response status codes. It includes codes from IETF internet standards, 303 error code hp other IETF RFCs, other specifications, and some additional commonly used codes. The first digit of the status code specifies one
Http 303 Error
of five classes of response; an HTTP client must recognise these five classes at a minimum. The phrases used are the standard wordings, but any human-readable alternative can be provided. Unless otherwise error 303 text message stated, the status code is part of the HTTP/1.1 standard (RFC 7231).[1] The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) maintains the official registry of HTTP status codes.[2] Microsoft IIS sometimes uses additional decimal sub-codes to provide more specific information,[3] but not all of those are here (note that these sub-codes only appear in the response payload and in documentation; not in the place of an actual HTTP error 303 windows 7 status code). Contents 1 1xx Informational 2 2xx Success 3 3xx Redirection 4 4xx Client Error 5 5xx Server Error 6 Unofficial codes 6.1 Internet Information Services 6.2 nginx 6.3 CloudFlare 7 See also 8 Notes 9 References 10 External links 1xx Informational[edit] Request received, continuing process. This class of status code indicates a provisional response, consisting only of the Status-Line and optional headers, and is terminated by an empty line. Since HTTP/1.0 did not define any 1xx status codes, servers must not[note 1] send a 1xx response to an HTTP/1.0 client except under experimental conditions.[4] 100 Continue The server has received the request headers and the client should proceed to send the request body (in the case of a request for which a body needs to be sent; for example, a POST request). Sending a large request body to a server after a request has been rejected for inappropriate headers would be inefficient. To have a server check the request's headers, a client must send Expect: 100-continue as a header in its initial request and receive a 100 Continue status code in response before sending the body. The response 417 Expectation Failed indicates the requ
that the response to the request can be found at the specified
Kcferrordomaincfnetwork Error 303
URL, and should be retrieved from there. It does not error 303 icon is missing from package mean that something has moved - it is simply specifying the address at which the response
Error 303 Eso
to the request can be found. Why it Occurs The HTTP status code 303 See Other is the correct manner to in which to redirect web applications https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes to a new URL, particularly after an HTTP POST has been performed.This response indicates that the correct response can be found under a different URL and should be retrieved using a GET method. The specified URL is not a substitute reference for the original resource. Fixing 303 Error Code The 303 response MUST http://100pulse.com/http-statuscode/303.jsp NOT be cached, but the response to the second (redirected) request might be cacheable. The different URL SHOULD be given by the Location field in the response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URL(s). If you monitor your website through 100 pulse, we will intimate you through mail or short message service whenever you encounter 303 status code. Features Website Monitoring Monitor DNS Server Mail Server Monitoring Mysql Server Monitoring FTP Monitoring Port Monitoring Alerts & Reports Instant Notification Web Server Monitoring Report Public Report Template Free Uptime Button Monitoring Tools Webpage Availability Checker Port checker DNS Checker IP Finder Server location Finder and more... Reseller Affiliate Program Pricing Latest Updates Feedback Write a testimonial About Us Contact Us Follow Us on Twitter Facebook Server Time : 29-Sep-2016 22:26:37 GMT All Rights reserved © 100pulse.com Terms | Privacy | Sitemap
Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the http://serverfault.com/questions/391181/examples-of-302-vs-303 workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack http://sharkseo.com/nohat/303-redirects-seo/ Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Server Fault Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how error 303 it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Examples of 302 vs 303 up vote 12 down vote favorite 2 What is the difference between a 302 and 303 response? http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html 10.3.3 302 Found 10.3.4 303 See Other Are these interchangeable or why would one be used 303 error page over the other? Could you please provide a use case of when one would be used (and the other would not) ? http redirect share|improve this question edited May 21 '12 at 19:38 asked May 21 '12 at 19:38 David542 32139 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 16 down vote accepted The description on the page to which you linked seem to be fairly descriptive of their intended purpose: A 302 redirect indicates that the redirect is temporary -- clients should check back at the original URL in future requests. A 303 redirect is meant to redirect a POST request to a GET resource (otherwise, the client assumes that the request method for the new location is the same as for the original resource). If you're redirecting a client as part of your web application but expect them to always start at the web application (for example, a URL shortener), a 302 redirect seems to make sense. A 303 redirect is for use when you are receiving POST data from a client (e.
community, and in truth it's for good reason. According to w3.org, 303s basically mean "see other". The redirecting URL shouldn't be cached and it generally indicates that the content is held elsewhere. Importantly though, it says this: "Many pre-HTTP/1.1 user agents do not understand the 303 status". SEOs generally know to use a 301 for the vast majority of redirects, but if you ever get a web dev or a design team that wants to use a 303, there's now a good example of why it should be avoided here: A search for "Wimbledon" in Google currently shows a blank .com also ranking, just as a 302 often would. This implies that a 303 redirect won't pass on link value to the main site, like a 301 would, and can cause the redirecting URL to also be listed in the SERPs. For some reason, the Wimbledon.com URL 301 redirects most users to the correct Wimbledon.org domain, but will show search engines a 303. You can switch your user agent to Googlebot and check. Yahoo and Bing treat 303s the same way: Yahoo also doesn't appear to see the .com redirect properly. And neither does Bing: So, in summary - 303 redirects don't appear to work properly to search engines. If you want your permanent redirects to be counted by the search engines, avoid them and use 301 redirect instead. Promote Post Enjoyed this post? 16 Comments July 16, 2010 10:23 am richardbaxterseo @richardbaxter Yes Dave - I love this kind of thing. Keep it up! July 16, 2010 10:43 am Sander Tamaela @CrashOne Nice article! But (concerning your example) if I was in control of the wimbledon.com domain, I would keep the 303 in place (the 3 top spots are nice to occupy) until I need the link value of the .com domain. July 16, 2010 10:52 am rob hammond @robhammond Good post but am I missing something? wimbledon.com serves (boom boom) a 301 for me July 16, 2010 12:16 pm Scott McLay @@Scott_Mclay Good overview of the 303 redirect, I have seen this before in the past, but it took me a while to actualy find the cause as i was looking for a 302 July 16, 2010 3:30 pm Admin @SharkSEO @Sander That's a fair point, I think for most sites (