Analysis Of Error
Contents |
it. In doing this it is crucial to understand that all measurements of physical quantities are subject to uncertainties. It is never possible analysis of error recovery schemes for networks on chips to measure anything exactly. It is good, of course, to make
Analysis Of Error Monitoring
the error as small as possible but it is always there. And in order to draw valid conclusions error propagation the error must be indicated and dealt with properly. Take the measurement of a person's height as an example. Assuming that her height has been determined to be 5' 8",
Percent Error
how accurate is our result? Well, the height of a person depends on how straight she stands, whether she just got up (most people are slightly taller when getting up from a long rest in horizontal position), whether she has her shoes on, and how long her hair is and how it is made up. These inaccuracies could all be error analysis equation called errors of definition. A quantity such as height is not exactly defined without specifying many other circumstances. Even if you could precisely specify the "circumstances," your result would still have an error associated with it. The scale you are using is of limited accuracy; when you read the scale, you may have to estimate a fraction between the marks on the scale, etc. If the result of a measurement is to have meaning it cannot consist of the measured value alone. An indication of how accurate the result is must be included also. Indeed, typically more effort is required to determine the error or uncertainty in a measurement than to perform the measurement itself. Thus, the result of any physical measurement has two essential components: (1) A numerical value (in a specified system of units) giving the best estimate possible of the quantity measured, and (2) the degree of uncertainty associated with this estimated value. For example, a measurement of the width of a table would yield a result such as 95.3 +/- 0.1 cm.
purpose of this section is to explain how and why the results deviate from the expectations. Error analysis should include a calculation of
Error Analysis Physics
how much the results vary from expectations. This can be done
Error Analysis Chemistry
by calculating the percent error observed in the experiment. Percent Error = 100 x (Observed- Expected)/Expected error analysis formula Observed = Average of experimental values observed Expected = The value that was expected based on hypothesis The error analysis should then mention sources of error that http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixB/AppendixB.html explain why your results and your expectations differ. Sources of error must be specific. "Manual error" or "human error" are not acceptable sources of error as they do not specify exactly what is causing the variations. Instead, one must discuss the systematic errors in the procedure (see below) to explain such sources of error in http://sciencefair.math.iit.edu/writing/error/ a more rigorous way. Once you have identified the sources of error, you must explain how they affected your results. Did they make your experimental values increase or decrease. Why? One can classify these source of error into one of two types: 1) systematic error, and 2) random error. Systematic Error Systematic errors result from flaws in the procedure. Consider the Battery testing experiment where the lifetime of a battery is determined by measuring the amount of time it takes for the battery to die. A flaw in the procedure would be testing the batteries on different electronic devices in repeated trials. Because different devices take in different amounts of electricity, the measured time it would take for a battery to die would be different in each trial, resulting in error. Because systematic errors result from flaws inherent in the procedure, they can be eliminated by recognizing such flaws and correcting them in the future. Random Error Random errors result from our li
or experimental values. This calculation will help you to evaluate the relevance of your results. It is helpful to know by what percent your experimental values differ from http://physics.appstate.edu/undergraduate-programs/laboratory/resources/error-analysis your lab partners' values, or to some established value. In most cases, a percent error or difference of less than 10% will be acceptable. If your comparison shows a difference of more than 10%, there is a great likelihood that some mistake has occurred, and you should look back over your lab to find the source of the error. These calculations are also very integral to your analysis error analysis analysis and discussion. A high percent error must be accounted for in your analysis of error, and may also indicate that the purpose of the lab has not been accomplished. Percent error: Percent error is used when you are comparing your result to a known or accepted value. It is the absolute value of the difference of the values divided by the accepted value, and written as a analysis of error percentage. Percent difference: Percent difference is used when you are comparing your result to another experimental result. It is the absolute value of the difference of the values divided by their average, and written as a percentage. A measurement of a physical quantity is always an approximation. The uncertainty in a measurement arises, in general, from three types of errors. Systematic errors: These are errors which affect all measurements alike, and which can be traced to an imperfectly made instrument or to the personal technique and bias of the observer. These are reproducible inaccuracies that are consistently in the same direction. Systematic errors cannot be detected or reduced by increasing the number of observations, and can be reduced by applying a correction or correction factor to compensate for the effect. Random errors: These are errors for which the causes are unknown or indeterminate, but are usually small and follow the laws of chance. Random errors can be reduced by averaging over a large number of observations. The following are some examples of systematic and random errors to consider when writing your error analysis. Incomplete definition (may be systematic or random) - One reason that it is impossible to make exact measurements is
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:51:32 GMT by s_hv997 (squid/3.5.20)