Error Cwbdb0099 Recovery

having a problem downloading a file using iSeries Access Data Transfer from System i. Whenever I perform my download, I get the CWBDB0099 and SQL0420 errors shown below. I can click OK and still download the file, but I'd like to get options(error=recover) rid of this error. What's going on and how do I fix it? --Laura Here's

R Options Error

the error message that Laura is referring to and what I did to solve it. After researching, I couldn't find any references to browse[1]> r the CWBDB0099 error with the SQL4020 sub-error. There were plenty of references to the CWBDB0099 error with sub-error SQL0181, which indicates an error of "Value in date, time, or timestamp string not valid." IBM's Support Document on CWBDB009 r exit debug and SQL0181 tells the user to run the Display File Field Description (DSPFFD) command on the file in question and look for any date fields that have a data type of ISO. If an ISO date type field is found, IBM instructs you to change your data transfer date/time format to ISO. I ran DSPFFD on the file and there were no date fields with a data type of ISO. However, there were three packed data fields

R Browser Commands

of length 5,0 and one packed date field of length 8,0. I reasoned that it was possible that one or more of those fields were being recognized as a date field by the iSeries Access Transfer program. So I decided to try IBM's fix even though it didn't strictly apply to the problem I was seeing on Laura's screen. To change the transfer's Date/Time format to ISO, I did the following: 1. On the Data Transfer from iSeries screen, I clicked on the Format Options button. 2. On the Change Data Options screen that appears, I clicked on the Date/Time tab. I then clicked on the Date format drop-down box and changed the Date format to ISO. I finally clicked on the Apply button to save the change. 3. We tried running the problematic Data Transfer again. This time, it downloaded the data without throwing up the error message. So I guess this goes to show that sometimes a good enough approach will be enough to solve a problem. Bonus: Another Way to Detect Disk Damage While I was researching my article on finding damaged objects, IBM sent me some information on running the Service Tools' Analyze Disk Surface option to detect damage objects and problems with your disk drive. Here's the drill if you want to run a more intensive disk analysis feature to find damaged object

Getting the Latest Firmware and Software Documentation and Feedback About This Documentation Support and Training Contributors Change History Hardware Installation and Product Notes Hardware Installation Product Notes Overview of the Sun Blade X3-2B Product https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E20881_01/html/E20896/sbxpn.gmddh.html Notes New In This Revision Terminology System Hardware and Software Features Firmware Release History Sun Blade 6000 Modular System Environment Supported Components with A90-B Chassis Supported Components with A90-D Chassis http://www.verycomputer.com/153_f57790273de46c59_1.htm Supported PCIe EMs Supported Server Module Components FEMs and REMs Required for NEMs Supported CPUs Supported Memory Supported Storage Drives Supported Operating Systems Server Update Information Integrated Lights Out Manager (ILOM) error cwbdb0099 Hardware, Firmware, and BIOS Current Issues and Announcements Restore SW v1.2 BIOS Configuration Before Downgrading From SW v1.3 to v1.2--New SW 1.2: Wait Period Required During SP Update Process--(16040413) DIMM Filler Panels are Now Optional Intel Quickpath Interconnect Error On Some 4-core and 6-core Servers (7146732) Oracle ILOM restore_status Parameter Shows Partial Status (7167938) Oracle ILOM 3.1 Might Not Support the error cwbdb0099 recovery Clearing of Faults Diagnosed by the Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 and Oracle Solaris 11 11/11 Operating Systems (7170842) Unable to Change Serial Port Ownership Using the BIOS Setup Utility (7168093) MegaRAID Storage Manager Unable to Assign Hot Spares on 3-TB Drives Using EFI Partitioning (7164218) New BIOS Boot Splash Screen Oracle Recommendations for Drive Slot Population and Virtual Drive Creation (7124194) PXE-booting Fails When Using Cisco Switch (7149683) UEFI Boot List Settings Might Be Lost When Transitioning Between UEFI and Legacy Boot Modes (7080526) Physical Storage Drives Listed Twice on the Sun Blade 6000 Storage Module M2 (7116807) Oracle System Assistant Current Issues and Announcements Do Not Downgrade Server BIOS From SW 1.3 to SW 1.2 (18016911)--New Manually Power On the System After Update to SW v1.3--New Some Server's USB Drives Do Not Contain Oracle System Assistant Platform Documentation Button Added to Interface Update Path to Oracle System Assistant Version 1.2 Firmware Update Task Fails If There are No Hard Disks in the Server (7178868) User Must Have Full Administrator Role Privileges to Update SP (7158820) Some Operating Systems Do No

my AS400. I am fed up and now want to try and reinstall V4R5. Can I do this with V4R5 already on the system? Will I have to reinstall the PTF's. Any other caveats??? Top Install V4R5 over V4R5??? by Thad Rizz » Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:00:08 I upgraded to V4R5 and have been having a lot of strange problems mostly dealing with pulling data from my AS400. I am fed up and now want to try and reinstall V4R5. Can I do this with V4R5 already on the system? Will I have to reinstall the PTF's. Any other caveats??? Thanks, Thad Rizzi Top Install V4R5 over V4R5??? by Barry L. Klin » Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:16:07 > I upgraded to V4R5 and have been having a lot of strange problems mostly > dealing with pulling data from my AS400. I am fed up and now want to try > and reinstall V4R5. Can I do this with V4R5 already on the system? Will I > have to reinstall the PTF's. Any other caveats??? > Thanks, > Thad Rizzi Wow -- OS/400 isn't Windows, so you shouldn't have to go through all of this. Perhaps you'd like to list a few of the problems you're having? What version did you come from? DId you read the "notice to users" for each of the versions you either upgraded to or through? If you went from V4R3 to V4R5, you'd certainly want to read the notice for V4R4. Give us some more specifics Thad and I'm sure someone can point you in the proper directory. Barry Top Install V4R5 over V4R5??? by Thad Rizz » Thu, 21 Dec 2000 03:21:11 I went from V4R4 to V4R5. Everything appeared to be fine until I started noticing strange and some what isolated problems. One of the problems is with PM400 some reports don't print. For instance if I try to print a system report on performance data collected, the job ends abnormally and I get the following in my job log. Message . . . . : FMTOPT(*DROP) or FMTOPT(*NOCHK) required