Calculating Error In Gradient Of Graph
Contents |
Springs Charge of an Electron Video Analysis Torque Rolling Objects Mechanical Energy Human Performance Old labs Extra Stuff Slope uncertainty Reports How to find the uncertainty in the slope This is an issue that I have not really addressed much. However, it calculating slope from a graph is important enough that I talk about it. In many labs, you will collect data,
Calculating Slope From A Graph Worksheet
make a graph, find the slope of a function that fits that data and use it for something. Well, what if need graph the line with the given point and slope calculator to find the uncertainty in the slope? How do you do that? There are a couple of ways you can do this, neither are absolutely correct. However, if you write a formal lab report and you
Graph Linear Equation Calculator
find the slope you MUST find the uncertainty in it. Here is some sample data. Suppose I measure the diameter and the circumference of several roundish objects. Here is my data. So, I want to plot this and find a functional relationship between these two. With error bars, this is what it should look like: Now, I want to fit a linear function to this data. That should be ok, but what about graph function calculator the uncertainty? Method 1 - use uncertainty of data points I could get the ratio of C/d by just looking at each data point. This is not as good as the slope because the slope essentially uses all the data points at once. In this method, I am going to find the slope as normal. In Excel, you could fit a trendline. Or, you could draw a best fit line. Either way, I would get something like this (I did this in Logger Pro): This gives a slope of 3.28 (compare to pi = 3.14). I could get a better slope if I required the fitting function to go through the origin (0,0), but I am not going to do that. In essence, the slope is: But, what if I just use one set of data points? Then I could use propagation of error as usual. This would give Where the delta - slope represents the uncertainty in the slope. For this method, just pick the data pair with the largest uncertainty (to be safe) - although hopefully, it won’t matter much. For this case, I will pick d= 0.06+/-0.002 m and C = 0.183 +/- 0.004 m. This would give an uncertainty in the slope of 0.2. I would write: (there are no units - they canceled)
Community Forums > Science Education > Homework and Coursework Questions > Introductory Physics Homework > Not finding help
Uncertainty In Gradient Excel
here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg
Error In Slope Of Linear Fit
Tutors Dismiss Notice Dismiss Notice Join Physics Forums Today! The friendliest, high quality science and math community uncertainty of slope linear regression on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here! Calculating error in gradient of a graph Feb 6, 2012 #1 yardy_genius Hello , i would like to https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/rallain/plab193/page1/page35/page36/page36.html know how do you calculate the error in the gradient of a graph when all the points fall on the line or is so close to the line to draw the maximum and minimum slope and using it in the general formula is not applicable. error in gradient = ±(max.slope- min slope) /2√N thanks https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/calculating-error-in-gradient-of-a-graph.574975/ guys. yardy_genius, Feb 6, 2012 Phys.org - latest science and technology news stories on Phys.org •Game over? Computer beats human champ in ancient Chinese game •Simplifying solar cells with a new mix of materials •Imaged 'jets' reveal cerium's post-shock inner strength Feb 6, 2012 #2 Spinnor This is close, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=173827 Post 3 might be closest to what you need. Do you have error bars for your data points? Spinnor, Feb 6, 2012 (Want to reply to this thread? Log in or Sign up here!) Show Ignored Content Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook Have something to add? Orbital Precession in the Schwarzschild and Kerr Metrics Why Is Quantum Mechanics So Difficult? General Brachistochrone Problem Name the Science Photo Omissions in Mathematics Education: Gauge Integration LHC Part 4: Searching for New Particles and Decays Precession in Special and General Relativity Struggles with the Continuum – Conclusion Why Supersymmetry? Because of Deligne’s theore
Anglia Ruskin University University of the Arts London (UAL) Aston University Bangor University University of Bath http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=581307 Bath Spa University University of Bedfordshire University of Birmingham Birmingham City University http://skipper.physics.sunysb.edu/~physlab/doku.php?id=phy124:error_and_uncertainty University of Bolton Bournemouth University BPP University University of Bradford University of Brighton University of Bristol Brunel University University of Buckingham Buckinghamshire New University University of Cambridge Canterbury Christ Church University Cardiff Metropolitan University Cardiff University University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) University of Chester University of Chichester error in City University London Coventry University University of Cumbria De Montfort University University of Derby University of Dundee Durham University University of East Anglia (UEA) University of East London Edge Hill University University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Napier University University of Essex University of Exeter Falmouth University University of Glasgow Glasgow Caledonian University University of Gloucestershire Glynd?r University Goldsmiths University University calculating slope from of Greenwich Heriot-Watt University University of Hertfordshire University of Huddersfield University of Hull Imperial College, London Keele University University of Kent King's College London Kingston University Lancaster University University of Leeds Leeds Metropolitan University Leeds Trinity University University of Leicester University of Lincoln University of Liverpool Liverpool Hope University Liverpool John Moores University London Metropolitan University London School of Economics London South Bank University Loughborough University University of Manchester Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) Middlesex University University of Newcastle New College of the Humanities University of Northampton Northumbria University University of Nottingham Nottingham Trent University Open University University of Oxford Oxford Brookes University University of Plymouth University of Portsmouth Queen Margaret University Queen Mary, University of London Queen's University Belfast University of Reading Robert Gordon University University of Roehampton Royal Holloway University of Salford University of Sheffield Sheffield Hallam University SOAS, University of London University of South Wales University of Southampton Southampton Solent University St Andrews University University of St Mark & St John (Marjon) Staffordshire University University of Stirling University of Strathclyde University of Sunderland Unive
and Graphs Sidebar PHY124 Navigation Home Instructions Sections Uncertainty, Error and Graphs Lab 1 - The Oscilloscope Lab 2 - The Electric Field Lab 3 - DC Circuits Lab 4 - Magnetic Force 1 Lab5/6 Magnetic Field/Induction Lab5/6 Charge-to-Mass Ratio (e/m) of the Electron Lab 7 AC Circuits Lab 8 Optics: Reflection, Refraction and Images Lab 9 Interference and Diffraction Lab 10 Atomic Spectra Plotting Tool Blackboard phy124:error_and_uncertainty Table of Contents Uncertainty, Error and Graphs Uncertainty in measurements An inspirational message from 1600 for care in experimentation Notation Error Absolute Error Relative Error Random Error Systematic Error Propagation of Errors Obtaining Values from Graphs An experiment with the simple pendulum: Things one would measure Estimate of error in the length of the string Error in the period Making a plot of our data Uncertainty, Error and Graphs Uncertainty in measurements In physics, as in every other experimental science, one cannot make any measurement without having some degree of uncertainty. A proper experiment must report for each measured quantity both a “best” value and an uncertainty. Thus it is necessary to learn the techniques for estimating them. Although there are powerful formal tools for this, simple methods will suffice in this course. To a large extent, we emphasize a “common sense” approach based on asking ourselves just how much any measured quantity in our experiments could be “off”. One could say that we occasionally use the concept of “best” value and its “uncertainty” in everyday speech, perhaps without even knowing it. Suppose a friend with a car at Stony Brook needs to pick up someone at JFK airport and doesn't know how far away it is or how long it will take to get there. You might have made this drive yourself (the “experiment”) and “measured” the distance and time, so you might respond, “Oh, it's 50 miles give or take a few, and it will take you one and a half hours give or take a half-hour or so, unless the traffic is awful, and then who knows?” What you'll learn to do in this course is to make such statements in a more precise form about real experimental data that you will collect and analyze. Semantics: It is better (and easier) to do physics when everyone taking part has the same meaning for each word being used. Words often confused, even by practicing scientists, are “uncertainty” and “error”. We hope that these remarks will help to avoid sloppiness when discussing and reporting experimental uncertai