Collation Error In Union Query
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About t-sql union collation conflict Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring union all collation conflict developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the
Collation Error In Sql Server 2008
Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Collation conflict in SQL Union All
Mysql Collation Error
Query up vote 0 down vote favorite 1 There is a Union All query as shown below. When fired in SQL server, I get an error "Cannot resolve collation conflict for column 1 in SELECT statement." Please, where do I add the Collate database_default statement with this Union All query? select OrgCode,null as OrgName, Q1_A1 as A1Value,Q1_a2 as A2Value,'Quarter 1' as dt,((Q1_A1-Q1_A2)/case when Q1_A1<>0 then Q1_A1 syntax error in union query else null end )*100 Percentage from #Tabl_Quarter_Calculation union all select OrgCode,null as OrgName,Q2_A1 as A1Value,Q2_a2 as A2Value,'Quarter 2' as dt,((Q2_A1-Q2_A2)/case when Q2_A1=0 then null else Q2_A1 end )*100 Percentage from #Tabl_Quarter_Calculation union all select [OrgCode],[OrgName],a1Value,a2Value,dt ,cast((a1value-a2value)/cast(a1value as real)*100 as varchar(10))+'%' Percentage from #Tbl_Display1 union all --4 week average select [OrgCode],[OrgName],sum(a1Value) as a1Value,Sum(a2Value) as a2Value,max(dt) as dt ,cast((sum(a1value)-sum(a2value))/cast(sum(a1value) as real)*100 as varchar(10))+'%' Percentage from #Tbl_Display1 group by [OrgCode],[OrgName] order by 1,5 sql-server sql-server-2000 share|improve this question edited Aug 12 '14 at 9:43 JamieA 1,54041431 asked Aug 12 '14 at 9:23 user1254579 96883455 1 which version of SQL server are you using? 2000,2005 or 2008? –JamieA Aug 12 '14 at 9:30 SQL SERVER 2000!! –user1254579 Aug 12 '14 at 9:37 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 6 down vote accepted Collation needs to be specified wherever strings from different collations are compared, commonly after a JOIN or WHERE condition. With a UNION, the columns in the SELECT are compared to ensure they can be unioned. Your error tells you it is column 1, so that is where you must specify the collation. Try the below select OrgCode COLLATE database_default,null as OrgN
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the
Syntax Error In Union Query Microsoft Access
company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow collation conflict between latin1_general_ci_as and sql_latin1_general_cp1_ci_as Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 expression type datetime is invalid for collate clause million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up SQL Server 2008 Collation conflict - how to resolve? up vote 9 down vote favorite For simplification, POC, I http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25260659/collation-conflict-in-sql-union-all-query have the following query, using character typed columns: select AH_NAME1 from GGIMAIN.SYSADM.BW_AUFTR_KOPF union select AH_NAME1 from GGI2014.SYSADM.BW_AUFTR_KOPF and I get the following error: Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 2 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CS_AS" in the UNION operation. GGI2014 was indeed created with collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. This has been changed in SMS and the instance has been restarted, also in SMS. When I look in SMS, as well http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21433204/sql-server-2008-collation-conflict-how-to-resolve as query: select name, collation_name from sys.databases all indications are that both GGIMAIN and GGI2014 are collated Latin1_General_CS_AS. Does anyone have any advice on what else needs to be done? Thanks, Matt sql sql-server sql-server-2008 share|improve this question edited Jan 29 '14 at 14:00 marc_s 451k938631029 asked Jan 29 '14 at 13:57 mtallon 55115 Hi marc_s. Can you explain why you edited my post? –mtallon Jan 30 '14 at 16:47 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 12 down vote accepted select AH_NAME1 COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT from GGIMAIN.SYSADM.BW_AUFTR_KOPF union select AH_NAME1 COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT from GGI2014.SYSADM.BW_AUFTR_KOPF Unless I am mistaken, changing the collation of the database does not change the collation of the already existing objects. Only new objects will be affected share|improve this answer answered Jan 29 '14 at 14:04 codeblur 353126 +1 - agree with you –Devart Jan 29 '14 at 14:05 add a comment| up vote 2 down vote Try this one (maybe you're columns have different collation) - SELECT AH_NAME1 COLLATE database_default FROM GGIMAIN.SYSADM.BW_AUFTR_KOPF UNION SELECT AH_NAME1 COLLATE database_default FROM GGI2014.SYSADM.BW_AUFTR_KOPF share|improve this answer answered Jan 29 '14 at 14:02 Devart 76.3k12100120 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign
Recent PostsRecent Posts Popular http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic676343-145-1.aspx TopicsPopular Topics Home Search Members Calendar Who's On Home » SQL Server 2005 » Development » -Cannot resolve collation conflict for UNION... -Cannot resolve collation http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=60320 conflict for UNION operation. Rate Topic Display Mode Topic Options Author Message karan457-979314karan457-979314 Posted Monday, March 16, 2009 4:15 AM SSC Rookie Group: General error in Forum Members Last Login: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:04 AM Points: 43, Visits: 269 Hi if i execute the following querryiam getting error can anybody please helpSELECT distinct UM.userName as TseNames, SSA.description as AreaNames, SSPA.TSEId as TSEID FROM SABM_SALES_PLAN_HEADERS SSPH,userMaster UM, SABM_Territory ST,SABM_SALES_AREAS SSA,SABM_SALES_PLAN_ACCESSES SSPA WHERE Um.locationMasterId = ST.locationId AND error in union SSPH.locationid=ST.locationid AND SSPH.StateId=ST.branchid AND SSPH.AreaId=SSA.AreaId AND UM.ID=SSPA.TSEID AND SSPH.ID=SSPA.PlanId AND SSA.branchid=ST.branchid AND ST.BranchId = '15' AND SSPH.ID=350 AND SSPH.locationid='8' UNION SELECT TT.tsename as TseNames, TT.areaname as AreaNames, TT.tseid as TSEID from Tsetemp TTerror ----Cannot resolve collation conflict for UNION operation. Post #676343 ChrisM@WorkChrisM@Work Posted Monday, March 16, 2009 4:58 AM SSCrazy Eights Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Today @ 10:17 AM Points: 8,502, Visits: 18,470 There's an excellent article by Steve Jones here which describes the cause and the solution to your problem. If you're still unsure after reading the article, then repost for additional help.CheersChrisM “Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail ShawFor fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White Hidden RBAR: Triangular Join
SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with. Our new SQL Server Forums are live! Come on over! We've restricted the ability to create new threads on these forums. SQL Server Forums Profile | ActiveTopics | Members | Search | ForumFAQ Register Now and get your question answered! Username: Password: Save Password Forgot your Password? All Forums SQL Server 2000 Forums Transact-SQL (2000) Collation on union view Reply to Topic Printer Friendly Author Topic wotrac Yak Posting Veteran United Kingdom 98 Posts Posted-01/14/2006: 05:44:02 I am trying to create a union view between two tables of the same name, across two SQL databases, but the database collation is different on both, even though they are on the same instance of SQl Server.I keep getting a collation conflict because of this and am not that up on collation to know how to solve the problem.Is there anybody that could assist?I can supply sample code if necessary. Edited by - wotrac on 01/14/2006 05:48:05 khtan In (Som, Ni, Yak) Singapore 17689 Posts Posted-01/14/2006: 09:15:50 convert the collation from one to another.a.col1 = b.col2 COLLATE