Error Analysis Dividing By A Constant
Contents |
or more quantities, each with their individual uncertainties, and then combine the information from these quantities in order to come up with a final result of our experiment. How can you state your answer for the combined result of these measurements and their uncertainties scientifically? The answer
Error Propagation Dividing By A Constant
to this fairly common question depends on how the individual measurements are combined in the uncertainty when dividing by a constant result. We will treat each case separately: Addition of measured quantities If you have measured values for the quantities X, Y, and Z,
Error Propagation Division By A Constant
with uncertainties dX, dY, and dZ, and your final result, R, is the sum or difference of these quantities, then the uncertainty dR is: Here the upper equation is an approximation that can also serve as an upper division error analysis worksheet bound for the error. Please note that the rule is the same for addition and subtraction of quantities. Example: Suppose we have measured the starting position as x1 = 9.3+-0.2 m and the finishing position as x2 = 14.4+-0.3 m. Then the displacement is: Dx = x2-x1 = 14.4 m - 9.3 m = 5.1 m and the error in the displacement is: (0.22 + 0.32)1/2 m = 0.36 m Multiplication of measured quantities In the same way long division error analysis as for sums and differences, we can also state the result for the case of multiplication and division: Again the upper line is an approximation and the lower line is the exact result for independent random uncertainties in the individual variables. And again please note that for the purpose of error calculation there is no difference between multiplication and division. Example: We have measured a displacement of x = 5.1+-0.4 m during a time of t = 0.4+-0.1 s. What is the average velocity and the error in the average velocity? v = x / t = 5.1 m / 0.4 s = 12.75 m/s and the uncertainty in the velocity is: dv = |v| [ (dx/x)2 + (dt/t)2 ]1/2 = 12.75 m/s [(0.4/5.1)2 + (0.1/0.4)2]1/2 = 3.34 m/s Multiplication with a constant What if you have measured the uncertainty in an observable X, and you need to multiply it with a constant that is known exactly? What is the error then? This is easy: just multiply the error in X with the absolute value of the constant, and this will give you the error in R: If you compare this to the above rule for multiplication of two quantities, you see that this is just the special case of that rule for the uncertainty in c, dc = 0. Example: If an object is realeased from rest a
would be your guess: can an American Corvette get away if chased by an Italian police Lamborghini?
The topError Propagation Division
speed of the Corvette is 186 mph ± 2 mph. The top speed error propagation physics of the Lamborghini Gallardo is 309 km/h ± 5 km/h. We know that 1 mile = 1.61 km. In
Error Propagation Calculator
order to convert the speed of the Corvette to km/h, we need to multiply it by the factor of 1.61. What should we do with the error? Well, you've learned in the previous http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/labs/error/e2.htm section that when you multiply two quantities, you add their relative errors. The relative error on the Corvette speed is 1%. However, the conversion factor from miles to kilometers can be regarded as an exact number.1 There is no error associated with it. Its relative error is 0%. Thus the relative error on the Corvette speed in km/h is the same as it was in https://phys.columbia.edu/~tutorial/propagation/tut_e_4_3.html mph, 1%. (adding relative errors: 1% + 0% = 1%.) It means that we can multiply the error in mph by the conversion constant just in the same way we multiply the speed. So our answer for the maximum speed of the Corvette in km/h is: 299 km/h ± 3 km/h. Now we are ready to answer the question posed at the beginning in a scientific way. The highest possible top speed of the Corvette consistent with the errors is 302 km/h. The lowest possible top speed of the Lamborghini Gallardo consistent with the errors is 304 km/h. Bad news for would-be speedsters on Italian highways. No way can you get away from that police car. The rule we discussed in this chase example is true in all cases involving multiplication or division by an exact number. You simply multiply or divide the absolute error by the exact number just as you multiply or divide the central value; that is, the relative error stays the same when you multiply or divide a measured value by an exact number. << Previous Page Next Page >> 1 For this example, we are regarding the conv
WorkSocial MediaSoftwareProgrammingWeb Design & DevelopmentBusinessCareersComputers Online Courses B2B Solutions Shop for Books San Francisco, CA Brr, it´s cold outside Search Submit Learn more with dummies Enter your email to join our mailing list for FREE content right to your inbox. http://www.dummies.com/education/science/biology/simple-error-propagation-formulas-for-simple-expressions/ Easy! Your email Submit RELATED ARTICLES Simple Error Propagation Formulas for Simple Expressions Key Concepts in Human Biology and Physiology Chronic Pain and Individual Differences in Pain Perception Pain-Free and Hating It: Peripheral Neuropathy Neurotransmitters That Reduce or Block Pain Load more EducationScienceBiologySimple Error Propagation Formulas for Simple Expressions Simple Error Propagation Formulas for Simple Expressions Related Book Biostatistics For Dummies By error propagation John Pezzullo Even though some general error-propagation formulas are very complicated, the rules for propagating SEs through some simple mathematical expressions are much easier to work with. Here are some of the most common simple rules. All the rules that involve two or more variables assume that those variables have been measured independently; they shouldn't be applied when the two variables have been by a constant calculated from the same raw data. Adding or subtracting a constant doesn't change the SE Adding (or subtracting) an exactly known numerical constant (that has no SE at all) doesn't affect the SE of a number. So if x = 38 ± 2, then x + 100 = 138 ± 2. Likewise, if x = 38 ± 2, then x - 15 = 23 ± 2. Multiplying (or dividing) by a constant multiplies (or divides) the SE by the same amount Multiplying a number by an exactly known constant multiplies the SE by that same constant. This situation arises when converting units of measure. For example, to convert a length from meters to centimeters, you multiply by exactly 100, so a length of an exercise track that's measured as 150 ± 1 meters can also be expressed as 15,000 ± 100 centimeters. For sums and differences: Add the squares of SEs together When adding or subtracting two independently measured numbers, you square each SE, then add the squares, and then take the square root of the sum, like this: For example, if each of two measu
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 08 Oct 2016 22:56:59 GMT by s_ac5 (squid/3.5.20)