Error Reading Revision Time For Folder Operations
IN LOG FILE. Subscribe You can track all active APARs for this component. APAR status Closed as fixed if next. 0x80004005 Error description The customers users work in the field - mostly in error code 3rd world counties or disaster regions. As a result of the environment that these users work in, they ccleaner constantly have problems with hardware, power supply and internal batteries failing etc. They have users from all over the world 'dial in' to the servers in Oxford, and these client machines are usually old and in a bad state of repair, so they tend to have system clocks that don't work well. As a result they find their time & date being reset. generating 1000's of warning messages for each user in the log file. They constantly get the issue with 'Invalid Time or Date Encountered' Error reading OperationTime for folder operations: D:\Data\Server\Domino\mail\DATABASE.nsf: Invalid Time or Date Encountered As a result of the system trying to log all these error messages to the log file, it is unable to keep up with occurrences and Domino stops responding while system recovers from the above. Therefore, The customer would like an INI parameter that would suppress the amount of these issues that appear in the log file. Local fix Reset the system clocks and create new replica's of all the databases on all servers Problem summary Problem conclusion Temporary fix Comments This APAR is associated with SPR# DPBE82XN6G. There are no more maintenance releases for the 7.x release. If this issue occurs in a future 8.5x release, it may be raised for resolution in that release. APAR Information APAR numberLO49147 Reported component nameDOMINO SERVER Reported component ID5724E6200 Reported release704 StatusCLOSED FIN PENoPE HIPERNoHIPER Special AttentionNoSpecatt Submitted date2010-02-23 Closed date2010-04-01 Last modified date2010-04-01 APAR is sysrouted FROM one or more of the following: APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following: Modules/Mac
resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Events Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs and reference Dev centers Retired content Samples We’re sorry. The content you requested has been removed. You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. Export (0) Print Expand All MSDN Library Open Specifications Protocols Windows Protocols References [MS-ERREF]: Windows Error Codes 2 Structures 2.1 HRESULT 2.2 Win32 Error Codes http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1LO49147 2.3 NTSTATUS 2.4 LDAP Error to Win32 Error Mapping Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. 2.2 Win32 Error Codes All Win32 error codes MUST be in the range 0x0000 to 0xFFFF, although Win32 error codes can be used both in 16-bit https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc231199.aspx fields (such as within the HRESULT type specified in section 2.1) as well as 32-bit fields. Most values also have a default message defined, which can be used to map the value to a human-readable text message; when this is done, the Win32 error code is also known as a message identifier. The following table specifies the values and corresponding meanings of the Win32 error codes. Vendors SHOULD NOT assign other meanings to these values, to avoid the risk of a collision in the future. This document provides the common usage details of the Win32 error codes; individual protocol specifications provide expanded or modified definitions. Note In the following descriptions, a percentage sign followed by one or more alphanumeric characters (for example, "%1" or "%hs") indicates a variable that will be replaced by text at the time the value is returned. Win32 error codes Description 0x00000000 ERROR_SUCCESS The operation completed successfully. 0x00000000 NERR_Success The operation completed successfully. 0x00000001 ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION Inco
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1190345/svn-merge-functionality-broken-by-tree-conflicts us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up svn merge functionality broken by tree conflicts up vote 25 down vote favorite 6 I don't know when the svn team decided to inflict tree conflicts on us but it has completely broken the merge functionality of svn. I have a error reading branch and I want to merge the latest changes from the trunk into the branch. I've already done one such merge, but this one fails because of a tree conflict. Here's the command: $ svn --force merge -r 3185:3192 svn://chamar2/rx-services/SAMS . svn: Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists The first time I tried this merge (without the --force) it only created the tree conflict and did not merge anything. Now it just reports the message above. If I do svn status on error reading revision the branch working copy it shows all the files that have changes that have not been merged back to the trunk yet. Of course, the purpose of my branch is to do these changes where they are not yet in the trunk. What were they thinking when they did this? I haven't found any usable information on what causes tree conflicts and how I can continue to work now that svn has created these things. Is there a way to tell svn to forget about tree conflicts and just do the merge like it used to? I'm using a 1.6 client and an older svn server (probably 1.3.1). svn merge tree-conflict share|improve this question edited Mar 21 '11 at 18:19 yegor256 39.4k57287435 asked Jul 27 '09 at 20:09 Dean Schulze 3,070105189 2 SVN didn't add tree conflicts as a feature; they are intrinsic to the nature of revision control. Now, you could make the point that SVN does a poor job handling and/or messaging about tree conflicts, but at least it DOES detect them and tries to let you know what's going on. –Tim Keating Aug 12 '11 at 16:57 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 11 down vote accepted The problem turned out to be that I had chosen the parent/ directory as the source of the merge instead of the parent/trunk/ directory. It was user error, but the tree conflict message is confusing. If svn had just gone ahead and done