Experimental Error In Electrophoresis
Contents |
Help Suggestions Send Feedback Answers Home All Categories Arts & Humanities Beauty & Style Business & Finance Cars & Transportation Computers & Internet Consumer Electronics Dining Out Education & Reference Entertainment & Music Environment Family & Relationships Food & Drink Games & Recreation Health Home & Garden Local Businesses News & Events Pets Politics & Government Pregnancy & Parenting
Sources Of Error In Electrophoresis
Science & Mathematics Social Science Society & Culture Sports Travel Yahoo Products International Argentina Australia electrophoresis experiment Brazil Canada France Germany India Indonesia Italy Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Philippines Quebec Singapore Taiwan Hong Kong Spain Thailand UK & Ireland electrophoresis theory Vietnam Espanol About About Answers Community Guidelines Leaderboard Knowledge Partners Points & Levels Blog Safety Tips Science & Mathematics Biology Next Sources of error for gel electrophoresis and specifically how they could have affected my data?
Electrophoresis Analysis
Follow 2 answers 2 Report Abuse Are you sure you want to delete this answer? Yes No Sorry, something has gone wrong. Trending Now Ariel Winter Kim Zolciak Gillian Anderson Demi Lovato Travel Insurance Toyota Highlander Conor McGregor Online Colleges Mia Goth Billy Bush Answers Best Answer: Too much or too little DNA was loaded in a well. Too much and bands smear badly. Too little and it cannot be seen. DNA was degraded.
Experimental Error Formula
DNA was electrophoresed off the gel by voltage being high and too much time elapsed before checking or the leads where swapped and the gel was run backwards. Use ~20 V/cm. The negative lead should be closest to wells. Buffer was not diluted correctly or used at the wrong concentration. Buffer run too fast so it heated. Keep buffer below 30C. Do not heat or denature DNA before running on gel. Be sure gel is correct percentage for fragment sizes. Gels must be 2-3% to resolve fragments under 100 bp. 0.7% resolves 800bp - 10kb Loading buffer is used to add DNA to well and provide blue dye front to mark progress in gel. Care must be made in loading not to puncture the bottom of the well. The comb was not set at the correct height for the casting tray and there was no bottom to some wells. Source(s): gardengallivant · 8 years ago 1 Thumbs up 0 Thumbs down Comment Add a comment Submit · just now Asker's rating Report Abuse your DNA may have been contaminated and thus have DNA outside of your studied sample infecting the results. Source(s): premed major Kelly C · 8 years ago 0 Thumbs up 0 Thumbs down Comment Add a comment Submit · just now Report Abuse Add y
Overview Keeping a lab notebook Writing research papers Dimensions & units Using figures (graphs) Examples of graphs Experimental error Representing error Applying statistics Overview Principles of microscopy Solutions & dilutions Protein experimental error examples assays Spectrophotometry Fractionation & centrifugation Radioisotopes and detection Error Analysis and Significant
Types Of Experimental Error
Figures Errors using inadequate data are much less than those using no data at all. C. Babbage] experimental error vs human error No measurement of a physical quantity can be entirely accurate. It is important to know, therefore, just how much the measured value is likely to deviate from the unknown, https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090315185438AA4nNdM true, value of the quantity. The art of estimating these deviations should probably be called uncertainty analysis, but for historical reasons is referred to as error analysis. This document contains brief discussions about how errors are reported, the kinds of errors that can occur, how to estimate random errors, and how to carry error estimates into calculated results. http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bioslabs/tools/data_analysis/errors_sigfigs.html We are not, and will not be, concerned with the “percent error” exercises common in high school, where the student is content with calculating the deviation from some allegedly authoritative number. You might also be interested in our tutorial on using figures (Graphs). Significant figures Whenever you make a measurement, the number of meaningful digits that you write down implies the error in the measurement. For example if you say that the length of an object is 0.428 m, you imply an uncertainty of about 0.001 m. To record this measurement as either 0.4 or 0.42819667 would imply that you only know it to 0.1 m in the first case or to 0.00000001 m in the second. You should only report as many significant figures as are consistent with the estimated error. The quantity 0.428 m is said to have three significant figures, that is, three digits that make sense in terms of the measurement. Notice that this has nothing to do with the "number of decimal places". The same measurement in centimeters wo
rates in DNA sequencing Errors of the data acquisition process The DNA sequence gathered through experimental process is gained through an examination of the fluorescent-dye intensity signal that is output by automatic sequencing machines. Even http://chevreux.org/thesis/node10.html with the newest generation of sequencers, raw sequence data obtained from them is - http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=a708256h by all means - everything but trustworthy in its entirety. Inevitable artifacts degrade the quality of the sequences obtained and are caused by experimental as well as systematic factors. Chromatography is a chemical process and thus subject to stochastic and non-stochastic oscillations, which can cause sub-optimal signal quality. Errors in a determined DNA sequence can be experimental error caused by flaws in the translation operations of the electrophoresis signal or quirks that arose during the experiment itself. This becomes visible in the wide diversity of data that is obtained even when using a single chemistry type, let alone different ones: under- and over- oscillations of the signals, unseparated curves (compression artefacts), and signal peaks or dropouts are frequent. Incorrect signal analysis raises errors in the base calling process of error in electrophoresis the signals and constitutes a limiting factor in the automation of assembly processes. Depending on a multiple factors - ranging from clone preprocessing and different dye-labelled terminators (or primers) to the type and length of gel used during electrophoresis (see also Lario etal. (1997); Rosenblum etal. (1997)) - the quality of the data gained along a single sequence substantially varies. Current laboratory techniques can examine nucleotide sequence fragments between 600 and 1300 bases long. In most cases there is a typical curve of error rates to be observed (see Engle and Burks (1994); Lipshutz etal. (1994); Ewing etal. (1998); Engle and Burks (1993); Richterich (1998)): it starts with a small stretch of low-quality bases (error rates between 3% and 8% for the first 50 to 70 bases, see figure 5) followed by a stretch of high quality data (error rates 1% to 2% for the following 600 to 800 bases in good traces7, figure 6), although it is nevertheless possible for low-quality data to be present amidst a high quality stretch. As the signal-to-noise ratio degrades towards the end of of a trace, the base quality starts to deteriorate rapidly after a certain time with error rates ranging from 2% up to over 10% and to 20% in the
Chemistry World Education in Chemistry Open Access Historical Collection Help FAQ Contact Us About RSC Publishing Feedback X Close We welcome your comments for improvement of this site and our services. Comments Email ID Security Details Please enter the characters in the box below as you see them. Thank you for helping us improve our site. 3 Home >Journals > Analyst > Potential sources of er... For Authors & Referees| For Librarians |For Members | Log in / Register Full Text Advanced Search Full Text Title Author DOI ISBN Analyst The home of premier fundamental discoveries, inventions and applications in the analytical and bioanalytical sciences You do not have JavaScript enabled. Please enable JavaScript to access the full features of the site or access our non-JavaScript page. Issue 5, 1998 Previous Article | Next Article Paper Potential sources of error in capillary electrophoresis–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for chemical speciation† Vahid Majidiand Nancy J. Miller-Ihli Analyst, 1998,123, 809-813 DOI: 10.1039/A708256H Download Citation Please select your preferred reference management format to save bibliographic data. BibTex EndNote MEDLINE ProCite ReferenceManager RefWorks RIS Request Permissions This content is free, please choose one of the three options provided in the Log in section to gain access. Please choose one of the options provided in the log in section to gain access to this content: Abstract Cited by Related Content Metrics The distribution concentration of chemical species in a sample is dictated by the physical and chemical properties of the matrix. As such, when a sample is pre-treated, in any way, there is a potential for redistribution of homologous species. The extent of this analyte redistribution is determined by both thermodynamic properties of species (e.g., changes in concent