Experimental Error Physics Definition
Contents |
the range of meanings. The definitions are taken from a sample of reference sources that represent the scope of the topic define error in physics of error analysis. Definitions from Webster's dictionary are also included for experimental error examples several of the terms to show the contrast between common vernacular use and the specific meanings of
Experimental Error Formula
these terms as they relate to scientific measurements. Sources: Taylor, John. An Introduction to Error Analysis, 2nd. ed. University Science Books: Sausalito, CA, 1997. Bevington, Phillip R. https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/rallain/plab193/labinfo/Error_Analysis/06_Sources_of_Error.html and D. Keith Robinson. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 2nd. ed. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1992. Baird, D.C. Experimentation: An Introduction to Measurement Theory and Experiment Design, 3rd. ed. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995. ISO. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International http://user.physics.unc.edu/~deardorf/uncertainty/definitions.html Committee on Weights and Measures (CIPM): Switzerland, 1993. Fluke. Calibration: Philosophy and Practice, 2nd. ed. Fluke Corporation: Everett, WA, 1994. Webster's Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary, Merriam-Webster: Springfield, MA, 2000. Notes: Many of the terms below are defined in the International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (abbreviated VIM), and their reference numbers are shown in brackets immediately after the term. Since the meaning and usage of these terms are not consistent among other references, alternative (and sometimes conflicting) definitions are provided with the name and page number of the reference from the above list. Comments are included in italics for clarification. References are only cited when they explicitly define a term; omission of a reference for a particular term generally indicates that the term was not used or clearly defined by that reference. Even more diverse usage of these terms may exist in other references not cited here. uncertainty (of measurement) [VIM 3.9] – parameter, associated with the result of a measur
Life in the Universe Labs Foundational Labs Observational Labs Advanced Labs Origins of Life in the Universe Labs Introduction to Color Imaging Properties of Exoplanets General Astronomy Telescopes Part 1: Using the Stars Tutorials http://astro.physics.uiowa.edu/ITU/glossary/percent-error-formula/ Aligning and Animating Images Coordinates in MaxIm Fits Header Graphing in Maxim Image Calibration in Maxim Importing Images into MaxIm Importing Images into Rspec Measuring Magnitude in Maxim Observing with Rigel Photometry in Maxim Producing Color Images Stacking Images Using SpectraSuite Software Using Tablet Applications Using the Rise and Set Calculator on Rigel Wavelength Calibration in Rspec Glossary Kepler's Third Law Significant Figures Percent Error Formula Small-Angle Formula experimental error Stellar Parallax Finder Chart Iowa Robotic Telescope Sidebar[Skip] Glossary Index Kepler's Third LawSignificant FiguresPercent Error FormulaSmall-Angle FormulaStellar ParallaxFinder Chart Percent Error Formula When you calculate results that are aiming for known values, the percent error formula is useful tool for determining the precision of your calculations. The formula is given by: The experimental value is your calculated value, and the theoretical value is your known value. A percentage very error in physics close to zero means you are very close to your targeted value, which is good. It is always necessary to understand the cause of the error, such as whether it is due to the imprecision of your equipment, your own estimations, or a mistake in your experiment.Example: The 17th century Danish astronomer, Ole Rømer, observed that the periods of the satellites of Jupiter would appear to fluctuate depending on the distance of Jupiter from Earth. The further away Jupiter was, the longer the satellites would take to appear from behind the planet. In 1676, he determined that this phenomenon was due to the fact that the speed of light was finite, and subsequently estimated its velocity to be approximately 220,000 km/s. The current accepted value of the speed of light is almost 299,800 km/s. What was the percent error of Rømer's estimate?Solution:experimental value = 220,000 km/s = 2.2 x 108 m/stheoretical value = 299,800 km/s 2.998 x 108 m/s So Rømer was quite a bit off by our standards today, but considering he came up with this estimate at a time when a majority of respected astronomers, like Cassini, still believed that the speed of light was infinite, his conclusion was an outstanding contribution to the
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 15 Oct 2016 09:50:51 GMT by s_wx1094 (squid/3.5.20)