Ata6.00 Failed To Identify I/o Error Err_mask=0x100
Technology - unRAID Server Community » Legacy Support (unRAID 5 and Older) » General Support (V5 and Older) » Is error log showing HDD Problems? [SOLVED] « previous ata failed to identify (i/o error err_mask=0x4) next » Send this topic Print Pages: [1] Go Down Author Topic: Is emask 0x10 (ata bus error) error log showing HDD Problems? [SOLVED] (Read 7793 times) Kandinsky Member Posts: 28 Is error log showing HDD Problems? [SOLVED] « on: May 19, 2013, 05:29:16 AM » Dear Experts,I am getting the errors below which seem to be repeating themselves over a short period of time. Should I be worried, if so how can I identify which drive is looking dodgy please? I am using the latest 12a release.Now with full syslog attached. Not sure which drive I need to give any smart report on since I don't know which one it is.May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x50 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x800 action 0x6 frozen (Errors)May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: irq_stat 0x08000000, interface fatal error (Errors)May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: SError: { HostInt } (Errors)May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: failed command: IDENTIFY DEVICE (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: cmd ec/00:01:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 pio 512 in (Drive related)May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: res 50/00:ff:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x50 (ATA bus error) (Errors)May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: status: { DRDY } (Drive related)May 19 12:20:10 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: hard resetting link (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:20 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:20 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: hard resetting link (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:30 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:30 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: hard resetting link (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:31 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) (Drive related)May 19 12:20:31 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: link online but device misclassified (Drive related)May 19 12:20:36 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) (Drive related)May 19 12:20:36 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4) (Errors)May 19 12:20:36 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5) (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:36 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: hard resetting link (Minor Issues)May 19 12:20:46 GOOGOLPLEX kernel: ata1: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) (Mi
Get Kubuntu Get Xubuntu Get Lubuntu Get UbuntuStudio Get Mythbuntu Get Edubuntu Get Ubuntu-GNOME Get UbuntuKylin Ubuntu Code of Conduct Ubuntu Wiki Community Wiki Other Support Launchpad Answers Ubuntu IRC Support AskUbuntu Official Documentation User Documentation Social Media Facebook Twitter Useful Links Distrowatch Bugs: Ubuntu PPAs: Ubuntu Web Upd8: Ubuntu OMG! Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support Hardware [ubuntu] ERROR: ata1.00 FAILED TO IDENTIFY Having an Issue With Posting ? Do you want to help us debug the posting issues ? < is the place to report it, thanks ! Results 1 to 5 of 5 Thread: ERROR: ata1.00 FAILED TO IDENTIFY Thread Tools http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=27491.0 Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode August 8th, 2008 #1 mortalic View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message 5 Cups of Ubuntu Join Date May 2007 Beans 21 SOLVED: ERROR: ata1.00 FAILED TO IDENTIFY Ok all you hardware uber geeks, I am stuck and need your help. I recently wiped 7.04 and installed 8.04 on my storage/printer server. The install failed trying to boot the live CD, drops https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=883335 me out to busybox with the following error over and over again: ata1.00 FAILED TO IDENTIFY (I/O ERROR. ERR_MASK=0X4) failed to recover some devices unable to find a medium containing a live file system After a fair amount of searches I found out that the Dell Vostro's suffer from this same issue and there are two workarounds. You can change your Bios Sata type to RAID (even if you don't have a raid) or you can add all_generic_ide to the grub menu.lst file. The bios option did not appear to work (I don't have a dell, it's an asus A8V-MX motherboard) so I added the line to grub. This got me through the install and everything. I started to copy all my data from one sata drive to the other (about 320ish GB) and it is telling me that I will need to wait 44hours!!!!!! Obviously there is a performance hit when you use the all_generic_ide option. Can someone possibly explain how to actually fix this issue? the way I see it, I can research this for 2 days and if we can figure it out I'll still come out ahead! Thanks! Let me know what other information I can post! Last edited by mortalic; August 9th, 2008 at 06:44 AM. Reason: SOLVED Adv Reply August 8th, 2008 #2 mc4man View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message . Join Date Jun 2007 Beans 15,525 R
Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Last Comment First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Bug244760 - ata1.00: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244760 failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4) Summary: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4) Status: CLOSED NOTABUG Aliases: None Product: Fedora Classification: Fedora Component: kernel (Show other bugs) Sub Component: --- Version: 7 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=25431 Hardware: All Linux Priority low Severity high TargetMilestone: --- TargetRelease: --- Assigned To: Kernel Maintainer List QA Contact: Brian Brock Docs Contact: URL: Whiteboard: Keywords: Depends On: Blocks: Show dependency tree failed to /graph Reported: 2007-06-18 20:53 EDT by srinivas varadaraj Modified: 2007-11-30 17:12 EST (History) CC List: 1 user (show) snecklifter See Also: Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix Doc Text: Story Points: --- Clone Of: Environment: Last Closed: 2007-09-29 19:31:09 EDT Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- CRM: Verified Versions: Category: --- oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: Cloudforms failed to identify Team: --- Attachments (Terms of Use) Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) Groups: None (edit) Description srinivas varadaraj 2007-06-18 20:53:56 EDT Description of problem: ATA driver ( pata_via 0000:00:0f.0: version 0.2.1 ). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): version 0.2.1 lspci -v output 00:0f.0 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP]) Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 17 [virtual] Memory at 000001f0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8] [virtual] Memory at 000003f0 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [size=1] [virtual] Memory at 00000170 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8] [virtual] Memory at 00000370 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [size=1] I/O ports at e100 [size=16] Capabilities: [c0] Power Management version 2 The primary controller is disabled on startup and the drives are not recognized. Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 800k libata version 2.20 loaded. pata_via 0000:00:0f.0: version 0.2.1 ata1: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x000101f0 ctl 0x000103f6 bmdma 0x0001e100 irq 14 ata2: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00010170 ctl 0x00010376 bmdma 0x0001e108 irq 15 scsi0 : pata_via ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1) ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4) ata1: failed to recover some de
Next #1 2006-09-26 13:48:16 Chocobo Member Registered: 2006-09-26 Posts: 24 ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed Hello,I just upgraded from 2.6.17.13-3 to 2.6.18-4 (testing) and when I am booting I hang temporarily with an ATA problem. Here is a snippet from dmesg...ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFE00 ctl 0xFE12 bmdma 0xFEA0 irq 18 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFE20 ctl 0xFE32 bmdma 0xFEA8 irq 18 scsi0 : ata_piix ata1.00: ATA-6, max UDMA/133, 156250000 sectors: LBA48 ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 8 ata1.01: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 312581808 sectors: LBA48 ata1.01: ata1: dev 1 multi count 8 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata1.01: configured for UDMA/133 scsi1 : ata_piix ata2: port is slow to respond, please be patient ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) ata2: SRST failed (status 0xFF) ata2: SRST failed (err_mask=0x100) ata2: softreset failed, retrying in 5 secs ata2: SRST failed (status 0xFF) ata2: SRST failed (err_mask=0x100) ata2: softreset failed, retrying in 5 secs ata2: SRST failed (status 0xFF) ata2: SRST failed (err_mask=0x100) ata2: reset failed, giving up Vendor: ATA Model: ST380013AS Rev: 8.05 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD1600JS-00M Rev: 02.0 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05Any ideas? Thanks. Offline #2 2006-09-27 16:39:12 Chocobo Member Registered: 2006-09-26 Posts: 24 Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed OK, I think I am going to post this as a bug. Offline #3 2006-09-29 08:29:40 zezaz Member From: Bordeaux, France Registered: 2004-04-26 Posts: 80 Website Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed Same problem here (Dell Optiplex GX270), since the upgrade to 2.6.18. Offline #4 2006-09-29 08:37:28 phrakture Arch Overlord From: behind you Registered: 2003-10-29 Posts: 7,879 Website Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed Are you all using ata_piix? http://phraktured.net Offline #5 2006-09-29 12:09:46 zezaz Member From: Bordeaux, France Registered: 2004-04-26 Posts: 80 Website Re: ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs) and ata2: SRST failed Hi phrakture, I hope this answers your question: # lsmod | grep ata ata_piix 10760 0 libata 85908 1 ata_piixAnd in case it helps too: # grep ^MOD /etc/rc.conf MOD_AUTOLOAD="yes" MOD_BLACKLIST=() MODULES=(tun capability) Offline #6 2006-09-29 15:07:32 phraktu