Ora Error 1002
Contents |
SQL TuningSecurityOracle UNIXOracle LinuxMonitoringRemote supportRemote plansRemote servicesApplication Server ApplicationsOracle FormsOracle PortalApp UpgradesSQL ServerOracle ConceptsSoftware SupportRemote Support Development Implementation Consulting StaffConsulting PricesHelp Wanted! Oracle PostersOracle Books Oracle Scripts Ion Excel-DB Don Burleson
Ora-01002 Fetch Out Of Sequence Java
Blog
fetch out of sequence in oracle cursor ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence tips Oracle Error Tips by Burleson Consulting The Oracle oerr utility notes ora-01002 fetch out of sequence ref cursor this on the ora-01002 error: ORA-01002: fetch out of sequence Cause: This error means that a fetch has been attempted from a cursor which is no longer valid. Note that a PL/SQLHow To Solve Ora 01002 Fetch Out Of Sequence
cursor loop implicitly does fetches, and thus may also cause this error. There are a number of possible causes for this error, including: 1) Fetching from a cursor after the last row has been retrieved and the ORA-1403 error returned. 2) If the cursor has been opened with the FOR UPDATE clause, fetching after a COMMIT has been issued will return the error.
Ora-01002 Fetch Out Of Sequence Ora-02063 Preceding Line From
3) Rebinding any placeholders in the SQL statement, then issuing a fetch before re-executing the statement. Action: 1) Do not issue a fetch statement after the last row has been retrieved - there are no more rows to fetch. 2) Do not issue a COMMIT inside a fetch loop for a cursor that has been opened FOR UPDATE. 3) Re-execute the statement after rebinding, then attempt to fetch again. ORA-01002 can have multiple causes including: A PL/SQL loop does fetches without notice Attempting to fetch from a cursor that is no longer valid (fetching from a row which has been retrieved). Fetching after a COMMIT has already been issued and a cursor is opened with the FOR UPDATE clause. Issuing a fetch before re-executing a SQL after rebinding placeholders. You may want to try using cursor attributes to dodge ORA-01002 in the future. To resolve a current ORA-01002, there are three actions you can perform: After the last record is received, do not issue a fetch Inside a fetch loop on a SELECT FOR UPDATE, do not use a COMMIT Try fetching again after re-executing the statement (after rebindi
ExpressionsReport Column PageResult SetSelect QuerySequenceSQL PlusStored Procedure FunctionSubquerySystem PackagesSystem Tables ViewsTableTable JoinsTriggerUser PreviliegeViewXML"ORA-1002: fetch out of sequence" because of the commit inside ora-01002 fetch out of sequence hibernate the SELECT..FOR UPDATE loop. : Cursor Fetch«Cursor«Oracle PL
Ora 01002 Fetch Out Of Sequence Select
/ SQLOracle PL / SQLCursorCursor Fetch"ORA-1002: fetch out of sequence" because of sql error: 1002, sqlstate: 24000 the commit inside the SELECT..FOR UPDATE loop. SQL> SQL> SQL> CREATE TABLE lecturer ( 2 id NUMBER(5) PRIMARY KEY, 3 http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_ora_01002_fetch_out_of_sequence.htm first_name VARCHAR2(20), 4 last_name VARCHAR2(20), 5 major VARCHAR2(30), 6 current_credits NUMBER(3) 7 ); Table created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, last_name, major,current_credits) 2 VALUES (10001, 'Scott', 'Lawson','Computer Science', 11); 1 row created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, http://www.java2s.com/Code/Oracle/Cursor/ORA1002fetchoutofsequencebecauseofthecommitinsidetheSELECTFORUPDATEloop.htm last_name, major, current_credits) 2 VALUES (10002, 'Mar', 'Wells','History', 4); 1 row created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, last_name, major,current_credits) 2 VALUES (10003, 'Jone', 'Bliss','Computer Science', 8); 1 row created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, last_name, major,current_credits) 2 VALUES (10004, 'Man', 'Kyte','Economics', 8); 1 row created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, last_name, major,current_credits) 2 VALUES (10005, 'Pat', 'Poll','History', 4); 1 row created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, last_name, major,current_credits) 2 VALUES (10006, 'Tim', 'Viper','History', 4); 1 row created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, last_name, major,current_credits) 2 VALUES (10007, 'Barbara', 'Blues','Economics', 7); 1 row created. SQL> SQL> INSERT INTO lecturer (id, first_name, last_name, major,current_credits) 2 VALUES (10008, 'David', 'Large','Music', 4); 1
Magazine Online 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 As Published In September/October 2004 TECHNOLOGY: Ask Tom On Fetching, Storing, and Indexing By Tom Kyte Our technologist fetches sequentially, stores inline, and indexes globally. We've http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/o54asktom-086284.html got a problem concerning an ORA-01002 error in a PL/SQL block. We learned that http://dbaforums.org/oracle/index.php?showtopic=20940 this error sometimes happens under special circumstances when updating selected data, such as when using a SELECT for an UPDATE. But this is not the case here. The strange thing is that we're getting this error only when reading data from a cursor, without any updates on the cursor data. The error occurs when fetch out executing a rollback to a savepoint statement: create table test (a integer); insert into test values (1); create table test2 (b integer); insert into test2 values (11); declare cursor c is select * from test; begin update test2 set b = 22; savepoint my_savepoint; for x in c loop -- do some work, but if we -- hit an error then: rollback to savepoint my_savepoint; end loop; end; / fetch out of Our logic is complex; we are processing a result set, and in the loop we have other processing. If we encounter an error, we want to undo all of our work to date. But we've discovered that when we roll back to the savepoint, we always fail with error ORA-01002 "Fetch out of Sequence." We are using Oracle8i Release 3 (8.1.7), and up to now we couldn't find a similar problem in any forum, so any hints are welcome. This makes sense, and, hopefully, you will agree. Your timeline was: At time t0, you did an update—you started a transaction. At time t1, you claimed a "savepoint." At time t1+, you could have modified the database. At time t2, you opened the result set. This result set can see the database "as of time t2, including any and all changes you made in your session—everything that happened from t0 on to t2." You could have modified the table TEST , for example. You didn't, but there is nothing that says you couldn't have. At time t3, you say, "Put the data back the way it was at time t1." It is as if t1+ did not happen; in your case, it didn't hap