Error Floating Point Unit
Contents |
by David Goldberg, published in the March, 1991 issue of Computing Surveys. Copyright 1991, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., reprinted by permission. Abstract floating point unit verilog Floating-point arithmetic is considered an esoteric subject by many people. This floating point unit design is rather surprising because floating-point is ubiquitous in computer systems. Almost every language has a floating-point floating point unit architecture datatype; computers from PCs to supercomputers have floating-point accelerators; most compilers will be called upon to compile floating-point algorithms from time to time; and virtually every operating system
Floating Point Rounding Error
must respond to floating-point exceptions such as overflow. This paper presents a tutorial on those aspects of floating-point that have a direct impact on designers of computer systems. It begins with background on floating-point representation and rounding error, continues with a discussion of the IEEE floating-point standard, and concludes with numerous examples of how computer builders floating point relative error can better support floating-point. Categories and Subject Descriptors: (Primary) C.0 [Computer Systems Organization]: General -- instruction set design; D.3.4 [Programming Languages]: Processors -- compilers, optimization; G.1.0 [Numerical Analysis]: General -- computer arithmetic, error analysis, numerical algorithms (Secondary) D.2.1 [Software Engineering]: Requirements/Specifications -- languages; D.3.4 Programming Languages]: Formal Definitions and Theory -- semantics; D.4.1 Operating Systems]: Process Management -- synchronization. General Terms: Algorithms, Design, Languages Additional Key Words and Phrases: Denormalized number, exception, floating-point, floating-point standard, gradual underflow, guard digit, NaN, overflow, relative error, rounding error, rounding mode, ulp, underflow. Introduction Builders of computer systems often need information about floating-point arithmetic. There are, however, remarkably few sources of detailed information about it. One of the few books on the subject, Floating-Point Computation by Pat Sterbenz, is long out of print. This paper is a tutorial on those aspects of floating-point arithmetic (floating-point hereafter) that have a direct connection to systems building. It consists of three loosely connected parts. The first section, Rounding Error, discusses the impli
the field of numerical analysis, and by extension in the subject of computational science. The quantity is also called macheps or unit roundoff, and it has the symbols Greek epsilon ϵ {\displaystyle \epsilon } invalid floating point operation error or bold Roman u, respectively. Contents 1 Values for standard hardware floating point
Floating Point Overflow Error
arithmetics 2 Formal definition 3 Arithmetic model 4 Variant definitions 5 How to determine machine epsilon 5.1 Approximation 6 See
Floating Point Exception Error
also 7 Notes and references 8 External links Values for standard hardware floating point arithmetics[edit] The following values of machine epsilon apply to standard floating point formats: IEEE 754 - 2008 Common name https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html C++ data type Base b {\displaystyle b} Precision p {\displaystyle p} Machine epsilon[a] b − ( p − 1 ) / 2 {\displaystyle b^{-(p-1)}/2} Machine epsilon[b] b − ( p − 1 ) {\displaystyle b^{-(p-1)}} binary16 half precision short 2 11 (one bit is implicit) 2−11 ≈ 4.88e-04 2−10 ≈ 9.77e-04 binary32 single precision float 2 24 (one bit is implicit) 2−24 ≈ 5.96e-08 2−23 ≈ 1.19e-07 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_epsilon binary64 double precision double 2 53 (one bit is implicit) 2−53 ≈ 1.11e-16 2−52 ≈ 2.22e-16 extended precision _float80[1] 2 64 2−64 ≈ 5.42e-20 2−63 ≈ 1.08e-19 binary128 quad(ruple) precision _float128[1] 2 113 (one bit is implicit) 2−113 ≈ 9.63e-35 2−112 ≈ 1.93e-34 decimal32 single precision decimal _Decimal32[2] 10 7 5 × 10−7 10−6 decimal64 double precision decimal _Decimal64[2] 10 16 5 × 10−16 10−15 decimal128 quad(ruple) precision decimal _Decimal128[2] 10 34 5 × 10−34 10−33 a according to Prof. Demmel, LAPACK, Scilab b according to Prof. Higham; ISO C standard; C, C++ and Python language constants; Mathematica, MATLAB and Octave; various textbooks - see below for the latter definition Formal definition[edit] Rounding is a procedure for choosing the representation of a real number in a floating point number system. For a number system and a rounding procedure, machine epsilon is the maximum relative error of the chosen rounding procedure. Some background is needed to determine a value from this definition. A floating point number system is characterized by a radix which is also called the base, b {\displaystyle b} , and by the precision p {\displaystyle p} , i.e. the number of radix b {\displaystyle b} digi
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2100490/floating-point-inaccuracy-examples about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Floating point inaccuracy examples up vote 29 down vote favorite 46 floating point How do you explain floating point inaccuracy to fresh programmers and laymen who still think computers are infinitely wise and accurate? Do you have a favourite example or anecdote which seems to get the idea across much better than an precise, but dry, explanation? How is this taught in Computer Science classes? floating-point floating-accuracy share edited Apr 24 '10 at 22:34 community wiki 4 revs, 3 users 57%David Rutten floating point unit locked by Bill the Lizard May 6 '13 at 12:41 This question exists because it has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, so please do not use it as evidence that you can ask similar questions here. This question and its answers are frozen and cannot be changed. More info: help center. Take a look into this article: What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic –Rubens Farias Jan 20 '10 at 10:17 1 You can comprove this with this simple javascript:alert(0.1*0.1*10); –user216441 Apr 24 '10 at 23:07 comments disabled on deleted / locked posts / reviews| 7 Answers 7 active oldest votes up vote 26 down vote accepted There are basically two major pitfalls people stumble in with floating-point numbers. The problem of scale. Each FP number has an exponent which determines the overall “scale” of the number so you can represent either really small values or really larges ones, though the number of digits you can devote for that is limited. Adding two numbers of different scale will sometimes result in the smaller one being “eaten” since there is no way to fit it into the larger scale. PS>