Error Cannot Set Up Function Evaluation

use this function to convert my (complicated) class to astring:--- cpp file ---char *toString(MyClass *) { ... }--- watch window ---toString(myClassInstance)This works well, but when I call this function with a function evaluation timed out c# derived class asparameter, then I get the error'cannot set up function evaluation'.

Function Evaluation Timed Out Entity Framework

This sometimes crashes my debugeeprocess and sometimes cause my function to stop working for the rest ofthe debug session.Does implicit function evaluation is turned off by user anybody have more info about this error message, and what I can doto avoid it?Thanks,eli Oleg Starodumov 2006-05-17 19:10:34 UTC PermalinkRaw Message Post by e***@gmail.comI wrote a function that can

Function Evaluation Timed Out Linq

be called from the watch window in thedebugger, I use this function to convert my (complicated) class to a--- cpp file ---char *toString(MyClass *) { ... }--- watch window ---toString(myClassInstance)This works well, but when I call this function with a derived class asparameter, then I get the error'cannot set up function evaluation'. This sometimes crashes my debugeeprocess and sometimes cause my function function evaluation timed out linq to sql to stop working for the rest ofthe debug session.Does anybody have more info about this error message, and what I can doto avoid it?It works for simple classes, so I would suspect that complexity of the classis somehow related with the problem. What do you mean when you say thatthe class is "complicated"? Probably it makes sense to try to reproduce itwith a similar test class and then try to simplify the class to see what causesthe problem.You can also try to pass the raw address of the object of the derived classto the function and see if it works that way.Regards,Oleg[VC++ MVP http://www.debuginfo.com/] e***@gmail.com 2006-05-18 06:56:26 UTC PermalinkRaw Message With complicated I mean: multiple inheritance. I think I know a bitmore about what is going on now:my pointer to my base class is different from the pointer to thederived class. I think the debugger ignores the type of the parameterof my function and simple passes the pointer of the derived classwithout casting it to the base class.This causes the function to 'crash', apparently the debugger runs thesefunctions in some kind of protected envir

here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers

Visual Studio 2013 Implicit Function Evaluation Is Turned Off By User

or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x

Visual Studio Debugger Timeout

Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it count = implicit function evaluation is turned off by user only takes a minute: Sign up Function evaluation timed out when examining variables in debug/stepping through up vote 11 down vote favorite 3 When debugging/stepping through code, and I try to examine a variable in the watch, I get errors http://microsoft.public.vc.debugger.narkive.com/e6SIqTJ5/cannot-set-up-function-evaluation for every inner-variable stating function evaluation timed out. Does anyone know why this is and how to avoid it? As it impacts my ability to debug code. This is within VS2010 Premium. c# .net visual-studio-2010 share|improve this question edited Dec 6 '13 at 11:07 Benjamin 11.4k1692171 asked Mar 15 '12 at 22:46 dotnetdev 19.1k65176309 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 11 down vote accepted The most likely cause of this problem is an implicit evaluation http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9729320/function-evaluation-timed-out-when-examining-variables-in-debug-stepping-through of a property or ToString method which causes an issue with the CLR evaluation thread. To verify this turn off implicit evaluation. Tools -> Options Debugging Uncheck "Enable property evaluation and other implicit function calls" Then restart your scenario and see if it works. share|improve this answer answered Mar 15 '12 at 22:49 JaredPar 451k859221227 this turned out to be a recursive call for me. On a property get() method, I was returning the public property instead of the private backing field. oops. –Induster May 1 '13 at 21:51 add a comment| up vote 3 down vote Visual studio executes the property getter to get its value, if it takes a long time either because its doing something expensive you get this error. consider: public class foo { private object lockObject = new object(); public int bar { get { lock(lockObject){ return 42; } } } public int aMethod() { lock(lockObject) { var a = this.bar; return a*2; //insert a break point here } } } If you add a break point on the return statement in aMethod the debugger will not be able to evaluate the bar property, because doing so requires that it acquires the lock object, but it won't be able to do so because the program will hold that lock forever while the break point is active share|improve this answer answered Mar 15 '12 at 22:55 Yaur 5,5661530 add a comment| Your

http://plus.google.com/111221966647232053570/ Téléchargements Visual Studio Accès à l'abonnement MSDN Kits https://msdn.microsoft.com/fr-fr/library/ms234762.aspx de développement logiciel (SDK) Logiciels d'évaluation Téléchargements gratuits https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/2182-failure-in-initial-user-supplied-objective-function-evaluation Ressources Office Ressources SharePoint Server 2013 Ressources SQL Server 2014 Express Ressources Windows Server 2012 Programmes Abonnements MSDN Présentation Avantages Administrateurs Étudiants Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Événements Communauté Magazine Forums Blogs Conseillers techniques Channel 9 Documentation API function evaluation et référence Centres de développement Contenu supprimé Exemples Nous sommes désolés. Le contenu que vous avez demandé a été supprimé. Vous allez être automatiquement redirigé dans 1 seconde. Visual Basic Reference Visual Basic Language Reference Error Messages Error Messages Function evaluation is function evaluation timed disabled because a previous function evaluation timed out Function evaluation is disabled because a previous function evaluation timed out Function evaluation is disabled because a previous function evaluation timed out '#ElseIf' must be preceded by a matching '#If' or '#ElseIf' '#Region' and '#End Region' statements are not valid within method bodies/multiline lambdas '' cannot be applied because the format of the GUID '' is not correct '' is not CLS-compliant because the interface '' it implements is not CLS-compliant '' is obsolete (Visual Basic Warning) '' is an event, and cannot be called directly '' cannot be used as a type constraint '' is not declared (Smart Device/Visual Basic Compiler Error) '.' is already implemented by the base class ''. Re-implementation of assumed '

Support Answers MathWorks Search MathWorks.com MathWorks Answers Support MATLAB Answers™ MATLAB Central Community Home MATLAB Answers File Exchange Cody Blogs Newsreader Link Exchange ThingSpeak Anniversary Home Ask Answer Browse More Contributors Recent Activity Flagged Content Flagged as Spam Help MATLAB Central Community Home MATLAB Answers File Exchange Cody Blogs Newsreader Link Exchange ThingSpeak Anniversary Home Ask Answer Browse More Contributors Recent Activity Flagged Content Flagged as Spam Help Trial software Sandoko (view profile) 1 question 0 answers 0 accepted answers Reputation: 0 Vote0 Failure in initial user-supplied objective function evaluation. Asked by Sandoko Sandoko (view profile) 1 question 0 answers 0 accepted answers Reputation: 0 on 28 Feb 2011 Accepted Answer by Matt Tearle Matt Tearle (view profile) 1 question 616 answers 237 accepted answers Reputation: 1,699 178 views (last 30 days) 178 views (last 30 days) Hi I am a beginner in matlab. Hope that someone can help me with this problem. I am doing a function minimization. The function depends on three variables (say x(1),x(2),q). But I want the function to be optimized over the first two variables (x(1),x(2)) only. So, for each value of q I assign, I will do fmincon on the function here is my fmincon command. x0= [0.01;0.007]; options=optimset('Algorithm','active-set'); [x fval]=fmincon(@(x)calc(x,q),x0,[ 0.5 -1 ; -1 1 ],[ 0 ; 0 ],[],[],[0;0],[1;1],[],[],options); where calc is my function. The warning that I get is this Warning: Trust-region-reflective algorithm does not solve this type of problem, using active-set algorithm. You could also try the interior-point algorithm: set the Algorithm option to 'interior-point' and rerun. > In fmincon at 460 In prog at 22 ??? Error using ==> @(x)calc(x,q) Too many input arguments. Error in ==> fmincon at 540 initVals.f = feval(funfcn{3},X,varargin{:}); Error in ==> prog at 22 [x fval] = fmincon(@(x)calc(x,q),x0,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub,c,ceq,options); Caused by: Failure in initial user-supplied objective function evaluation. FMINCON cannot continue. Cannot find the problem with my fmincon command especially the "too many input argument" problem. can someone tell me what is the problem that can cause the Failure in initial user-supplied objective function evaluation? Thanks in advance. 4 Comments Show 1 older comment Oleg Komarov Oleg Komarov (view profile) 36 questions 1,020 answers 481 accep