Disable Gcc Error
Contents |
suggest there may have been an error. The following language-independent options do not enable specific warnings but control the kinds of diagnostics produced by GCC. -fsyntax-onlyCheck the code disable gcc warning for syntax errors, but don't do anything beyond that. -fmax-errors=nLimits the
Gcc Error Trying To Exec 'cc1plus'
maximum number of error messages to n, at which point GCC bails out rather than attempting to continue gcc error trying to exec 'cc1' processing the source code. If n is 0 (the default), there is no limit on the number of error messages produced. If -Wfatal-errors is also specified, then -Wfatal-errors takes gcc error trying to exec 'cc1plus' execvp precedence over this option. -wInhibit all warning messages. -WerrorMake all warnings into errors. -Werror=Make the specified warning into an error. The specifier for a warning is appended; for example -Werror=switch turns the warnings controlled by -Wswitch into errors. This switch takes a negative form, to be used to negate -Werror for specific warnings; for example -Wno-error=switch makes -Wswitch
Gcc Error Spawn No Such File Or Directory
warnings not be errors, even when -Werror is in effect. The warning message for each controllable warning includes the option that controls the warning. That option can then be used with -Werror= and -Wno-error= as described above. (Printing of the option in the warning message can be disabled using the -fno-diagnostics-show-option flag.) Note that specifying -Werror=foo automatically implies -Wfoo. However, -Wno-error=foo does not imply anything. -Wfatal-errorsThis option causes the compiler to abort compilation on the first error occurred rather than trying to keep going and printing further error messages. You can request many specific warnings with options beginning with ‘-W’, for example -Wimplicit to request warnings on implicit declarations. Each of these specific warning options also has a negative form beginning ‘-Wno-’ to turn off warnings; for example, -Wno-implicit. This manual lists only one of the two forms, whichever is not the default. For further language-specific options also refer to C++ Dialect Options and Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialect Options. When an unrecognized warning option is requested (e.g., -Wunknown-warning), GCC emits
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta gcc error createprocess no such file Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn gcc error unrecognized command line option '-v' more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us
Gcc Error Unrecognized Argument In Option ‘-mabi=aapcs-linux’
Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/Warning-Options.html helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up gcc with -Werror and -Wno-error=unused up vote 4 down vote favorite 1 I always compile with -Wall -Wextra -Werror. However many times as I do quick compile tests I need to ignore the -Wunused suit of errors. For various reasons I want to see them http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28278455/gcc-with-werror-and-wno-error-unused as warnings and not errors while leaving all other warnings as errors. -Wno-unused of course doesn't display any warning so is not what I need. The one I thought is the solution -Wno-error=unused unfortunately doesn't seem to work (they are still reported as errors), Individually setting the flags (e.g. -Wno-error=unused-variable) works as expected (reported as warning only). So is there a way to make them warnings while leaving -Werror without to specify all the suit of options -Wno-error=unsused-... individually? Is the behavior of -Werro -Wno-error=unused a bug? gcc compiler-warnings compiler-options share|improve this question asked Feb 2 '15 at 13:07 bolov 13.1k22767 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote No there is no way to turn them off at once. -Wunused enable list of options like: -Wunused-function -Wunused-label -Wunused-value -Wunused-variable And you should disable them one by one with Wnooption. share|improve this answer edited Feb 2 '15 at 14:20 answered Feb 2 '15 at 14:03 Arseniy 2,20512354 1 I think you
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8159978/temporarily-disable-gcc-warning-on-redefinition the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11561261/how-to-compile-without-warnings-being-treated-as-errors 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Temporarily disable gcc warning on redefinition up vote 15 down vote favorite 2 I'm trying to make gcc error this work (in GCC 4.6) without barking at me. #define FOO "" #define BAR "" #if .... #define FOO "Foo, good sir" #endif #if ... #define BAR "Bar, my lady" #endif .... #define EVERYTHING FOO BAR ... I am going to have a lot of these. So doing it that way instead of: #if ... #define FOO "Foo" #else #define FOO "" #endif Saves a lot of code, and makes it more gcc error trying readable. The warning that I get is: warning: "FOO" redefined [enabled by default] Is there a way to disable this warning in the code for this particular section? I found Diagnostic Pragmas to disable certain warnings, but I'm not able to find which warning (in this list of Options to Request or Suppress Warnings) that needs to be disabled here. Anyone know how to do this? Or a different way to avoid having to #else #define all of them to the empty string? gcc c-preprocessor share|improve this question edited Jul 6 at 19:37 Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩 3,093112775 asked Nov 16 '11 at 23:01 Jonathon Reinhart 64.4k14107180 6 You can use -Wp,-w to disable preprocessor warnings –osgx Nov 17 '11 at 0:07 1 This warning comes from Soviet Russian file named "cccp.c" in gcc (as of 2.95 version), and it can't be turned off. There is still no option to disable this warning individually even in git head, gcc/libcpp/macro.c (and line 2994 of the same file) –osgx Nov 17 '11 at 0:14 @osgx if you make that comment an answer, I would like to accept it. –Jonathon Reinhart Dec 8 '11 at 20:31 3 Thank you, random down-voter! I'm glad my 3.5 year old question didn't meet your
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up How to compile without warnings being treated as errors? up vote 33 down vote favorite 6 The problem is that the same code that compiles well on Windows, is unable to compile on Ubuntu. Every time I get this error: cc1: warnings being treated as errors Now, it's big code base and I don't like fix all the warnings. Is there any way I can compile successfully in spite of the warnings? c gcc compiler-warnings share|improve this question edited Sep 24 '14 at 15:51 Pro Backup 375420 asked Jul 19 '12 at 12:51 Saurabh Verma 2,31042245 1 I strongly suggest trying to fix the warnings. If not immediately, then gradually. Once you get rid of -Werror, you can add it back on a per-directory basis, after you've removed warnings. –ugoren Jul 19 '12 at 13:04 Even if you do compile successfully, it might not run the way you expect. I've had a few people write code that works just fine on Windows but crashes immediately on Linux. –Dennis Meng Jul 19 '12 at 16:39 Thanks everyone for their useful comments and answers. According to the requirement it seems that I have to fix all the warnings, which I have started. But now the warning I'm getting is from sqlite3.c: Assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X - c) <= X is always true –Saurabh Verma Jul 20 '12 at 7:22 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 38 down vote Sure, find where -Werror is set and remove that flag. Then warnings will be only warnings. share|improve this answer answered Jul 19 '12 at 12:52 Daniel Fischer 139k12219351 1 Thanks Daniel, but there is no -Werror flag set in my project. Should I look for it somewhere else ? –Saurabh Verma Jul 19 '12 at 12:53 5 Somewhere it must be set, by default warnings aren't treated as errors by any compiler I know. If you can't find it, you can try overriding it with -Wno-error, as nightcracker sugge