Group Policy Error 4106
(עברית)المملكة العربية السعودية (العربية)ไทย (ไทย)대한민국 (한국어)中华人民共和国 (中文)台灣 (中文)日本 (日本語) HomeWindows Server 2012Windows Server 2008 R2Windows Server 2003LibraryForums Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Answered by: Group policy Preference item level targeting security group not working issue. Windows Server > Group Policy Question 0 Sign in to vote group policy preferences item level targeting Group policy preference Rule generates error in event logs.. What: I created a rule that Adds the %ComputerName% kb2514376 AD group to the local computers Administrator group.. There is a criteria on the rule that requires the %ComputerName% group to exist and be in a specific OU container.. (this is becouse our environment is shared with other departments and I didnt want somene in another department to gain administrative control of any of our workstations. Why: So I can dynamicly allow my coworkers to temporarily add user to the local administrator groups without modifying group policy. I also have other rules that explicitly set the membership of ALL local groups so if someone were to change anything on a machine... those changes would go away when policy applies. This works.. so long as a group exists for each %ComputerName%. (the rule correctly does not apply, and does not generate any error when the group exists outside of the required OU). If on group exists in the domain = %ComputerName% ... The event logs register an error event. This is becouse the policy preference is trying to apply the policy object.. even thoe the criteria restrictions should not allow it to be applied. Monday, April 26, 2010 6:33 PM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote Trying adding the group "DomainName\%computername% Administrators" i know this works. Here is a link to a blog that i did with a step by step on how to do this exact thing... http://www.grouppolicy.biz/2010/01/how-to-use-group-policy-preferences-to-secure-local-administrator-groups/ I have also noticed that in this configuration you need tohave the "%computername% Administrators"as a seperate itemother wise it does not work. Also... if the group does not exist in the domain that is fine... it will log a
Group Policy Preferences. On the one hand, they are an awesome time-saver. On the other, they are embarrassingly flawed. Last time I wrote about them I hoped upon hope that they would be better in Windows 7. They are. A bit. However, they still suck in certain circumstances. My most recent annoyance is with the filtering system. This essentially allows you to create conditions for each setting that will be checked when Group Policy is processed. Only if those conditions are met will the settings be applied to the computer or user. These is what makes Group Policy Preferences so powerful, and there are many different types of conditions you can use. Unfortunately, some of them are https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/26b6d4d4-3ca5-47e9-a257-d69495f6f3c6/group-policy-preference-issue?forum=winserverGP just plain broken. One of the most common ones I find myself wanting to use is the group membership filter, which checks whether the computer or user is a member of a particular AD group. I've had problems in the past with these not correctly detecting nested group membership, and more recently, not working at all. What I've found is that the most intuitive ways of configuring these filters are the least reliable. When you configure a https://angrytechnician.wordpress.com/2010/03/01/group-policy-preferences-still-useful-still-pants/ security group filter (above), the natural thing to do is to click the little … button next to group name, and pick the group using the normal AD search dialogue. This then fills in the group SID: Unfortunately, you've now broken your filter, at least if you use this method on a Files or Registry preference. Every time I've tried it, my clients have failed to apply the setting and left the following error in the Event log: Log Name: Application
Source: Group Policy Files
Date: 18/02/2010 16:14:52
Event ID: 8196
Task Category: (2)
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: SYSTEM
Computer: robinson.angrytech.internal
Description:
The client-side extension caught the unhandled exception 'filter expand' inside: 'Access violation (0xc0000005) occurred at 0x6172676f; the memory at 0x6172676f could not be 柠燃샨ċ.' See trace file for more details. Yes, those characters really did appear in my Event Log. Today I tried something different; I just typed in the name of the group, without picking it: Again it failed, but with a subtly different and only slightly less cryptic error: 0x8007203a "The server is not operational." That error led me here, to someone's coding frustrations with undocumented bugs in the AD functions of the .NET Framework. His revelations on what worked for him, and what didn't, led me to try something slightly else: j
Tasks Ask Question Answer Questions My Profile ShortcutsDiscussion GroupsFeature RequestsHelp and SupportHow-tosIT Service ProvidersMy QuestionsApp CenterRatings and ReviewsRecent ActivityRecent https://community.spiceworks.com/windows_event/show/8227-group-policy-scheduled-tasks-4106 PostsScript CenterSpiceListsSpiceworks BlogVendor PagesWindows Events Event 4106 (Warning) Source: Group Policy Scheduled Tasks How important is this event? (0 votes) 1 2 3 4 5 not important very important Description This Windows Event does not have a description yet. Add link Text to display: Where should this link go? Add Cancel × Insert code Language Apache group policy AppleScript Awk BASH Batchfile C C++ C# CSS ERB HTML Java JavaScript Lua ObjectiveC PHP Perl Text Powershell Python R Ruby Sass Scala SQL VB.net Vimscript XML YAML Insert Cancel Save Cancel Associated Messages message string data: user, DOMAIN\GPO_Name, GPP Scheduled Task Description {86BEDC44-42C6-4CB0-8633-0FD88B0D0974}, 0x86012004 The client-side extension caught the unhandled exception 'filter expand' inside: 'Access violation item level targeting (0xc0000005) occurred at 0x04014c00; the memory at 0x04014c00 could not be ???C.'%100790275
Mar 29, 2011 Comments Ghost Chili Mar 29, 2011 TimJ42 It Service Provider, 51-100 Employees Found this error logged in the application log of a Windows 7 32-bit computer. Messages was also logged with error 8196, Group Policy Scheduled Tasks. Another symptom found was that GPP scheduled tasks were not being pushed to the client, even though folder permissions for the %systemroot%\system32\Tasks and subfolder was set properly. Solution was to apply MS hotfix 976399. After that error was not logged and scheduled tasks were successfully pushed out by GPP. Add your comments on this Windows Event! Join the IT Network or Login. Stats Reported 5 years ago 1 Comment 2,300 Views Other sources for 4106 Windows Backup nckmmsg Group Policy Printers Group Policy Shortcuts Group Policy Drive Maps Group Policy Registry Group Policy Local Users and Groups Group Policy Files See More Others from Group Policy Scheduled Tasks 8194 4098 8196 4103 8198 8192 4099 IT's ea