Mvc3 Error Handling Best Practices

here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn mvc 5 error handling more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or asp.net mvc error handling best practices posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow handle error attribute in asp.net mvc Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up What is best practice for global error/exception handling in exception handling in mvc 4 razor ASP.NET MVC? up vote 4 down vote favorite 1 I've seen two methods of implementing global error handling in an ASP.NET MVC 3 application. One method is via the Application_Error method in Global.asax.cs. For example (Error Handling in global.asax): public class SomeWebApplication : System.Web.HttpApplication { // ... other methods ... protected void Application_Error() { // ... application error handling code ... } } The other method is via

Exception Filter In Mvc 4

a [HandleError] action filter attribute registered in the RegisterGlobalFilters method, again in Global.asax.cs. Which is the better way to approach this? Are there any significant disadvantages to either approach? asp.net-mvc-3 exception-handling share|improve this question edited Jan 4 '13 at 21:48 Shannon Wagner 271623 asked Sep 22 '11 at 8:23 dan 2,33973252 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 7 down vote accepted [HandleError] is the way to go since it keeps everything simple and responsibility is clear. This action filter is a specific ASP.NET MVC feature and therefore is the official way of handling errors. It's also quite easy to override the filter to add custom functionality. Application_Error is the old way to do it and doesn't really belong in MVC. The [HandleError] attribute works fine as long as you remember to tag your controllers (or the base controller) with it. Update: Created a blog entry: http://blog.gauffin.org/2011/11/how-to-handle-errors-in-asp-net-mvc/ share|improve this answer edited Jan 4 '13 at 21:31 Shannon Wagner 271623 answered Sep 22 '11 at 10:29 jgauffin 68.7k25151267 I think if I register it as a global filter it applies to all controllers? –dan Sep 22 '11 at 11:51 3 What's your approach for err

here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of

Mvc Exception Filter

this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn exception filter in mvc 5 more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question handle error in mvc example x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Best http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7511752/what-is-best-practice-for-global-error-exception-handling-in-asp-net-mvc practices for asp.net mvc error handling [closed] up vote 13 down vote favorite 7 I'm looking for a standard way to handle errors in asp.net mvc 2.0 or 3.0 404 error handler Controller scope exception error handler Global scope exception error handler Thanks all asp.net-mvc error-handling share|improve this question edited Dec 24 '10 at 2:26 kd7 21.9k84785 asked Dec 24 '10 at 2:20 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4523831/best-practices-for-asp-net-mvc-error-handling noname.cs 7243719 closed as not constructive by casperOne Jun 27 '12 at 19:13 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 1 frig this is such a problem. It's definitely not natively supported in MVC as you would expect. –Chase Florell Dec 24 '10 at 2:30 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 6 down vote For controller scope errors try using a custom Exception attribute i.e. public class RedirectOnErrorAttribute : FilterAttribute, IExceptionFilter { public void OnException(ExceptionContext filterContext) { // Don't interfere if the exception is already handled if(filterContext.ExceptionHandled) return; //.. log exception and do appropriate redirects here } } Then decorate the controllers with the attribute and error handling should be yours [RedirectOnError] public class TestController : Contro

DevelopmentASP.NET HTML5 JavaScript Mobile Development Database Development Windows Development Azure Development Visual Studio Advertisement Home > Development > Web http://devproconnections.com/aspnet-mvc/aspnet-mvc-tutorial-handling-errors-and-exceptions Development > ASP.NET MVC > ASP.NET MVC Tutorial: Handling Errors and Exceptions ASP.NET MVC Tutorial: Handling Errors and Exceptions Common practices for handling errors and trapping exceptions Mar 4, 2012 Dino Esposito | Dev Pro EMAIL Tweet Comments 0 Advertisement RELATED: "Using Data Annotations for ASP.NET MVC 3 Input Validation" and "Exploring the Razor in mvc Syntax in ASP.NET MVC 3" In ASP.NET MVC, error handling can be split in two parts: handling errors and exceptions that occur within the code and handling exceptions at the framework level. You can easily deal with the first type of exceptions; however, you have to intervene in various places and use different error handling best tools to neutralize the impact of route exceptions and HTTP errors. In the end, you gain total control over runtime exceptions by writing error handlers within controllers and at least a global exception handler in global.asax. Let's find out the details and explore common practices for handling exceptions in ASP.NET MVC. Catching Exceptions in Controllers In controllers you write plain code, and in plain code you typically catch exceptions by using try/catch blocks. This approach gives you the most flexibility but at the cost of adding some noise to the code. Having a bunch of try/catch blocks scattered through a single method, though effective, makes reading the code a bit more difficult. The point here is not to question the importance of exception handling but simply to consider whether there's a better way of achieving the same results using easier-to-read code. Conveniently in this regard, Microsoft offers us the OnException overridable method and the HandleError filter attribute. Both