Logistic Regression Odds Ratio Standard Error
Contents |
on statistics Stata Journal Stata Press Stat/Transfer Gift Shop Purchase Order Stata Request a quote Purchasing FAQs Bookstore Stata Press books Books on Stata Books
Standard Error Of Odds Ratio Calculator
on statistics Stat/Transfer Stata Journal Gift Shop Training NetCourses Classroom and web On-site logistic regression odds ratio confidence interval Video tutorials Third-party courses Support Updates Documentation Installation Guide FAQs Register Stata Technical services Policy Contact Publications Bookstore Stata
How To Interpret Logistic Regression Results
Journal Stata News Conferences and meetings Stata Conference Upcoming meetings Proceedings Email alerts Statalist The Stata Blog Web resources Author Support Program Installation Qualification Tool Disciplines Company StataCorp Contact us Hours logistic regression odds ratio interpretation of operation Announcements Customer service Register Stata online Change registration Change address Subscribe to Stata News Subscribe to email alerts International resellers Careers Our sites Statalist The Stata Blog Stata Press Stata Journal Advanced search Site index Purchase Products Training Support Company >> Home >> Resources & support >> FAQs >> Standard errors, confidence intervals, and significance tests How odds ratio logistic regression spss are the standard errors and confidence intervals computed for relative-risk ratios (RRRs) by mlogit? How are the standard errors and confidence intervals computed for odds ratios (ORs) by logistic? How are the standard errors and confidence intervals computed for incidence-rate ratios (IRRs) by poisson and nbreg? How are the standard errors and confidence intervals computed for hazard ratios (HRs) by stcox and streg? Title Standard errors, confidence intervals, and significance tests for ORs, HRs, IRRs, and RRRs Authors William Sribney, StataCorp Vince Wiggins, StataCorp Someone asked: How does Stata get the standard errors of the odds ratios reported by logistic and why do the reported confidence intervals not agree with a 95% confidence bound on the reported odds ratio using these standard errors? Likewise, why does the reported significance test of the odds ratio not agree with either a test of the odds ratio against 0 or a test against 1 using the reported standard error? Standard Errors The odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), incidence-rate ratios (IRRs), and relative-risk ratios (RRRs) are all just univariate transformations of the estimated betas for the logistic, su
standard errors into odds ratios is trivial in Stata: just add , or to the end of
Confidence Interval Logistic Regression R
a logit command: . use "http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/data/hsbdemo", clear . logit honors negative odds ratio i.female math read, or Logistic regression Number of obs = 200 LR chi2(3) = 80.87
Logistic Regression Confidence Intervals For Predicted Probabilities
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 Log likelihood = -75.209827 Pseudo R2 = 0.3496 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ honors | Odds Ratio Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/2deltameth.html Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- female | female | 3.173393 1.377573 2.66 0.008 1.35524 7.430728 math | 1.140779 .0370323 4.06 0.000 1.070458 1.21572 read | 1.078145 .029733 2.73 0.006 1.021417 1.138025 _cons | 1.99e-06 3.68e-06 -7.09 0.000 5.29e-08 .0000749 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing the same thing in R is a little trickier. Calculating odds ratios https://www.andrewheiss.com/blog/2016/04/25/convert-logistic-regression-standard-errors-to-odds-ratios-with-r/ for coefficients is trivial, and exp(coef(model)) gives the same results as Stata: # Load libraries library(dplyr) # Data frame manipulation library(readr) # Read CSVs nicely library(broom) # Convert models to data frames # Use treatment contrasts instead of polynomial contrasts for ordered factors options(contrasts=rep("contr.treatment", 2)) # Load and clean data df <- read_csv("http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/data/hsbdemo.csv") %>% mutate(honors = factor(honors, levels=c("not enrolled", "enrolled")), female = factor(female, levels=c("male", "female"), ordered=TRUE)) # Run model model <- glm(honors ~ female + math + read, data=df, family=binomial(link="logit")) summary(model) #> #> Call: #> glm(formula = honors ~ female + math + read, family = binomial(link = "logit"), #> data = df) #> #> Deviance Residuals: #> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max #> -2.0055 -0.6061 -0.2730 0.4844 2.3953 #> #> Coefficients: #> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) #> (Intercept) -13.12749 1.85080 -7.093 1.31e-12 *** #> femalefemale 1.15480 0.43409 2.660 0.00781 ** #> math 0.13171 0.03246 4.058 4.96e
Health Search databasePMCAll DatabasesAssemblyBioProjectBioSampleBioSystemsBooksClinVarCloneConserved DomainsdbGaPdbVarESTGeneGenomeGEO DataSetsGEO ProfilesGSSGTRHomoloGeneMedGenMeSHNCBI Web SiteNLM CatalogNucleotideOMIMPMCPopSetProbeProteinProtein ClustersPubChem BioAssayPubChem CompoundPubChem SubstancePubMedPubMed HealthSNPSparcleSRAStructureTaxonomyToolKitToolKitAllToolKitBookToolKitBookghUniGeneSearch termSearch Advanced Journal list Help Journal ListBMJv.320(7247); 2000 May 27PMC1127651 BMJ. 2000 May 27; 320(7247): 1468. PMCID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1127651/ PMC1127651Statistics NotesThe odds ratioJ Martin Bland, professor of medical statisticsa and Douglas G Altman, professor of statistics in medicinebaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, bICRF Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LFCorrespondence to: Professor BlandAuthor information ► Copyright and License information ►Copyright © 2000, British Medical JournalThis article has logistic regression been cited by other articles in PMC.In recent years odds ratios have become widely used in medical reports—almost certainly some will appear in today's BMJ. There are three reasons for this. Firstly, they provide an estimate (with confidence interval) for the relationship between two binary (“yes or no”) variables. Secondly, they enable us to examine the effects of other variables on that relationship, using logistic regression odds logistic regression. Thirdly, they have a special and very convenient interpretation in case-control studies (dealt with in a future note).The odds are a way of representing probability, especially familiar for betting. For example, the odds that a single throw of a die will produce a six are 1 to 5, or 1/5. The odds is the ratio of the probability that the event of interest occurs to the probability that it does not. This is often estimated by the ratio of the number of times that the event of interest occurs to the number of times that it does not. The table shows data from a cross sectional study showing the prevalence of hay fever and eczema in 11 year old children.1 The probability that a child with eczema will also have hay fever is estimated by the proportion 141/561 (25.1%). The odds is estimated by 141/420. Similarly, for children without eczema the probability of having hay fever is estimated by 928/14 453 (6.4%) and the odds is 928/13 525. We can compare the groups in several ways: by the difference between the proportions, 141/561−928/14 453=0.187 (or 18.7 percentage points); the ratio o