Logistic Regression Standard Error Interpretation
Contents |
Analysis This page shows an example of logistic regression regression analysis with footnotes explaining the output. These data were collected on 200 how to interpret logistic regression results in spss high schools students and are scores on various tests, including science, math,
Logistic Regression Output Interpretation
reading and social studies (socst). The variable female is a dichotomous variable coded 1 if the student
Logistic Regression Odds Ratio Interpretation
was female and 0 if male. Because we do not have a suitable dichotomous variable to use as our dependent variable, we will create one (which we will call
Logistic Regression Standard Error Of Coefficients
honcomp, for honors composition) based on the continuous variable write. We do not advocate making dichotomous variables out of continuous variables; rather, we do this here only for purposes of this illustration. use http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/data/hsb2, clear generate honcomp = (write >=60) logit honcomp female read science Iteration 0: log likelihood = -115.64441 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -84.558481 Iteration interpreting logistic regression stata 2: log likelihood = -80.491449 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -80.123052 Iteration 4: log likelihood = -80.118181 Iteration 5: log likelihood = -80.11818 Logit estimates Number of obs = 200 LR chi2(3) = 71.05 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 Log likelihood = -80.11818 Pseudo R2 = 0.3072 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ honcomp | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- female | 1.482498 .4473993 3.31 0.001 .6056111 2.359384 read | .1035361 .0257662 4.02 0.000 .0530354 .1540369 science | .0947902 .0304537 3.11 0.002 .035102 .1544784 _cons | -12.7772 1.97586 -6.47 0.000 -16.64982 -8.904589 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Iteration Log Iteration 0: log likelihood = -115.64441 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -84.558481 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -80.491449 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -80.123052 Iteration 4: log likelihood = -80.118181 Iteration 5:a log likelihood = -80.11818 a. This is a listing of the log likelihoods at each iteration. (Remember that logistic regression uses maximum likelihood, which is an iterative procedure.) The first iteration (called iteration 0) is the log likelihood of the "null" or "empty" model; that is,
page shows an example of logistic regression with footnotes explaining the output. The data were collected on 200 high school students, with measurements on various tests, including science, wald chi square interpretation math, reading and social studies.The response variable is high writing test score (honcomp), sas logistic regression output where a writing score greater than or equal to 60 is considered high, and less than 60 considered low; from wald test logistic regression which we explore its relationship with gender (female), reading test score (read), and science test score (science). The dataset used in this page can be downloaded from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/webbooks/reg/default.htm. data logit; set "c:\temp\hsb2"; honcomp http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/output/stata_logistic.htm = (write >= 60); run; proc logistic data= logit descending; model honcomp = female read science; run; The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.LOGIT Response Variable honcomp Number of Response Levels 2 Model binary logit Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read 200 Number of Observations Used 200 Response Profile Ordered Total Value honcomp Frequency 1 1 53 2 0 147 Probability modeled http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/output/sas_logit_output.htm is honcomp=1. Model Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates AIC 233.289 168.236 SC 236.587 181.430 -2 Log L 231.289 160.236 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 71.0525 3 <.0001 Score 58.6092 3 <.0001 Wald 39.8751 3 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Intercept 1 -12.7772 1.9759 41.8176 <.0001 female 1 1.4825 0.4474 10.9799 0.0009 read 1 0.1035 0.0258 16.1467 <.0001 science 1 0.0948 0.0305 9.6883 0.0019 Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits female 4.404 1.832 10.584 read 1.109 1.054 1.167 science 1.099 1.036 1.167 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 85.6 Somers' D 0.714 Percent Discordant 14.2 Gamma 0.715 Percent Tied 0.2 Tau-a 0.279 Pairs 7791 c 0.857 Model Information Model Information Data Seta WORK.LOGIT Response Variableb honcomp Number of Response Levelsc 2 Modeld binary logit Optimization Techniquee Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Readf 200 Number of Observations Usedf 200 Response Profile Ordered Total Valueg honcompg Frequencyh 1 1 53 2 0 147 Probability modeled is honcomp=1.i a. Data Set -
are Z-Values in Logistic Regression? Posted on May 31, 2014 by StatsProf Very Short Answer The z-value is the regression coefficient divided by its standard http://logisticregressionanalysis.com/1577-what-are-z-values-in-logistic-regression/ error. It is also sometimes called the z-statistic. It is usually https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_regression given in the third column of the logistic regression regression coefficient table output. Thus, in the example below, the z-value for the regression coefficient for ResidenceLength is . If the z-value is too big in magnitude (i.e., either too positive or too negative), it indicates logistic regression that the corresponding true regression coefficient is not 0 and the corresponding -variable matters. A good rule of thumb is to use a cut-off value of 2 which approximately corresponds to a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of . So, for the ResidenceLength variable, the z-value is 1.79 which is not large enough to logistic regression standard provide strong evidence that ResidenceLength matters. Note: The relationship between the regression coefficient, its standard error, the z-value, and the p-value is virtually identical both logistic regression and regular least-squares regression. So if you understand this is regular regression, you also understand it in logistic regression. Detailed Explanation In statistics, the letter "Z" is often used to refer to a random variable that has a standard normal distribution. A standard normal distribution is a normal distribution with expectation 0 and standard deviation 1. This is the normal distribution that is generally tabulated in the back of any basic statistics book. Because of this, the term "z-value" is often used to refer to the value of a statistic that has a standard normal distribution. Sometimes it is also used to refer to percentile points from the standard normal distribution that are used to compare to the value of statistic. For example, one might refer to "the z-value corresponding to a 95% confidence interval" (which would be 1.96).
model Generalized linear model Discrete choice Logistic regression Multinomial logit Mixed logit Probit Multinomial probit Ordered logit Ordered probit Poisson Multilevel model Fixed effects Random effects Mixed model Nonlinear regression Nonparametric Semiparametric Robust Quantile Isotonic Principal components Least angle Local Segmented Errors-in-variables Estimation Least squares Ordinary least squares Linear (math) Partial Total Generalized Weighted Non-linear Non-negative Iteratively reweighted Ridge regression Least absolute deviations Bayesian Bayesian multivariate Background Regression model validation Mean and predicted response Errors and residuals Goodness of fit Studentized residual Gauss–Markov theorem Statistics portal v t e "Logit model" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Logit function. In statistics, logistic regression, or logit regression, or logit model[1] is a regression model where the dependent variable (DV) is categorical. This article covers the case of binary dependent variables—that is, where it can take only two values, such as pass/fail, win/lose, alive/dead or healthy/sick. Cases with more than two categories are referred to as multinomial logistic regression, or, if the multiple categories are ordered, as ordinal logistic regression.[2] Logistic regression was developed by statistician David Cox in 1958.[2][3] The binary logistic model is used to estimate the probability of a binary response based on one or more predictor (or independent) variables (features). As such it is not a classification method. It could be called a qualitative response/discrete choice model in the terminology of economics. Logistic regression measures the relationship between the categorical dependent variable and one or more independent variables by estimating probabilities using a logistic function, which is the cumulative logistic distribution. Thus, it treats the same set of problems as probit regression using similar techniques, with the latter using a cumulative normal distribution curve instead. Equivalently, in the latent variable interpretations of these two methods, the first assumes a standard logistic distribution of errors and the second a standard normal distribution of errors.[citation needed] Logistic regression can be seen as a special case of the generalized linear model and thus analogous to linear regression. The model of logistic regression, however, is based on quite different assumptions (about the relationship between dependent and independent variables) from those of linear regression. In particular the key differences of these two models can be se