Multiple Regression Standard Error Of Estimate Formula
Contents |
is used to predict a single dependent variable (Y). The predicted value of Y is a linear transformation of the X variables such that the sum of squared deviations of the observed and predicted Y is a minimum. The computations are more complex, however, because the interrelationships among all regression with two independent variables in excel the variables must be taken into account in the weights assigned to the variables. The interpretation
Multiple Regression Example Problems
of the results of a multiple regression analysis is also more complex for the same reason. With two independent variables the prediction of Y is
Multiple Regression Equation Example
expressed by the following equation: Y'i = b0 + b1X1i + b2X2i Note that this transformation is similar to the linear transformation of two variables discussed in the previous chapter except that the w's have been replaced with b's and
Multiple Regression Equation With 3 Variables
the X'i has been replaced with a Y'i. The "b" values are called regression weights and are computed in a way that minimizes the sum of squared deviations in the same manner as in simple linear regression. The difference is that in simple linear regression only two weights, the intercept (b0) and slope (b1), were estimated, while in this case, three weights (b0, b1, and b2) are estimated. EXAMPLE DATA The data used to illustrate the inner workings of standard error multiple regression multiple regression will be generated from the "Example Student." The data are presented below: Homework Assignment 21 Example Student PSY645 Dr. Stockburger Due Date
Y1 Y2 X1 X2 X3 X4 125 113 13 18 25 11 158 115 39 18 59 30 207 126 52 50 62 53 182 119 29 43 50 29 196 107 50 37 65 56 175 135 64 19 79 49 145 111 11 27 17 14 144 130 22 23 31 17 160 122 30 18 34 22 175 114 51 11 58 40 151 121 27 15 29 31 161 105 41 22 53 39 200 131 51 52 75 36 173 123 37 36 44 27 175 121 23 48 27 20 162 120 43 15 65 36 155 109 38 19 62 37the ANOVA table (often this is skipped). Interpreting the regression coefficients table. Confidence intervals for the slope parameters. Testing for statistical significance of coefficients Testing hypothesis on a slope parameter. Testing overall significance of the regressors. Predicting y given how to calculate multiple regression by hand values of regressors. Excel limitations. There is little extra to know beyond regression with multiple correlation coefficient formula one explanatory variable. The main addition is the F-test for overall fit. MULTIPLE REGRESSION USING THE DATA ANALYSIS ADD-IN This requires the multiple correlation coefficient in r Data Analysis Add-in: see Excel 2007: Access and Activating the Data Analysis Add-in The data used are in carsdata.xls We then create a new variable in cells C2:C6, cubed household size as a regressor. Then in cell http://www.psychstat.missouristate.edu/multibook/mlt06m.html C1 give the the heading CUBED HH SIZE. (It turns out that for the se data squared HH SIZE has a coefficient of exactly 0.0 the cube is used). The spreadsheet cells A1:C6 should look like: We have regression with an intercept and the regressors HH SIZE and CUBED HH SIZE The population regression model is: y = β1 + β2 x2 + β3 x3 + u It is assumed that the http://cameron.econ.ucdavis.edu/excel/ex61multipleregression.html error u is independent with constant variance (homoskedastic) - see EXCEL LIMITATIONS at the bottom. We wish to estimate the regression line: y = b1 + b2 x2 + b3 x3 We do this using the Data analysis Add-in and Regression. The only change over one-variable regression is to include more than one column in the Input X Range. Note, however, that the regressors need to be in contiguous columns (here columns B and C). If this is not the case in the original data, then columns need to be copied to get the regressors in contiguous columns. Hitting OK we obtain The regression output has three components: Regression statistics table ANOVA table Regression coefficients table. INTERPRET REGRESSION STATISTICS TABLE This is the following output. Of greatest interest is R Square. Explanation Multiple R 0.895828 R = square root of R2 R Square 0.802508 R2 Adjusted R Square 0.605016 Adjusted R2 used if more than one x variable Standard Error 0.444401 This is the sample estimate of the standard deviation of the error u Observations 5 Number of observations used in the regression (n) The above gives the overall goodness-of-fit measures: R2 = 0.8025 Correlation between y and y-hat is 0.8958 (when squared gives 0.8025). Adjusted R2 = R2 - (1-R2 )*(k-1)/(n-k) =
it comes to determining how well a linear model fits the data. However, I've stated previously that R-squared is overrated. Is there a different goodness-of-fit statistic that http://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics/regression-analysis-how-to-interpret-s-the-standard-error-of-the-regression can be more helpful? You bet! Today, I’ll highlight a sorely underappreciated regression statistic: S, or the standard error of the regression. S provides important information that R-squared does not. What is the http://people.duke.edu/~rnau/regnotes.htm Standard Error of the Regression (S)? S becomes smaller when the data points are closer to the line. In the regression output for Minitab statistical software, you can find S in the multiple regression Summary of Model section, right next to R-squared. Both statistics provide an overall measure of how well the model fits the data. S is known both as the standard error of the regression and as the standard error of the estimate. S represents the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line. Conveniently, it tells you how wrong the regression model multiple regression equation is on average using the units of the response variable. Smaller values are better because it indicates that the observations are closer to the fitted line. The fitted line plot shown above is from my post where I use BMI to predict body fat percentage. S is 3.53399, which tells us that the average distance of the data points from the fitted line is about 3.5% body fat. Unlike R-squared, you can use the standard error of the regression to assess the precision of the predictions. Approximately 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 2*standard error of the regression from the regression line, which is also a quick approximation of a 95% prediction interval. For the BMI example, about 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 7% of the fitted line, which is a close match for the prediction interval. Why I Like the Standard Error of the Regression (S) In many cases, I prefer the standard error of the regression over R-squared. I love the practical, intuitiveness of using the natural units of the response variable. And, if I need precise predictions, I can quickly check S to asse
1: descriptive analysis · Beer sales vs. price, part 2: fitting a simple model · Beer sales vs. price, part 3: transformations of variables · Beer sales vs. price, part 4: additional predictors · NC natural gas consumption vs. temperature What to look for in regression output What's a good value for R-squared? What's the bottom line? How to compare models Testing the assumptions of linear regression Additional notes on regression analysis Stepwise and all-possible-regressions Excel file with simple regression formulas Excel file with regression formulas in matrix form If you are a PC Excel user, you must check this out: RegressIt: free Excel add-in for linear regression and multivariate data analysis Additional notes on linear regression analysis To include or not to include the CONSTANT? Interpreting STANDARD ERRORS, "t" STATISTICS, and SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS of coefficients Interpreting the F-RATIO Interpreting measures of multicollinearity: CORRELATIONS AMONG COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES and VARIANCE INFLATION FACTORS Interpreting CONFIDENCE INTERVALS TYPES of confidence intervals Dealing with OUTLIERS Caution: MISSING VALUES may cause variations in SAMPLE SIZE MULTIPLICATIVE regression models and the LOGARITHM transformation To include or not to include the CONSTANT? Most multiple regression models include a constant term (i.e., an "intercept"), since this ensures that the model will be unbiased--i.e., the mean of the residuals will be exactly zero. (The coefficients in a regression model are estimated by least squares--i.e., minimizing the mean squared error. Now, the mean squared error is equal to the variance of the errors plus the square of their mean: this is a mathematical identity. Changing the value of the constant in the model changes the mean of the errors but doesn't affect the variance. Hence, if the sum of squared errors is to be minimized, the constant must be chosen such that the mean of the errors is zero.) In a simple regression model, the constant represents the Y-intercept of the regression line, in unstandardized form. In a multiple regression model, the constant represents the value that would be predicted for the dependent variable if all the independent variables were simultaneously equal to zero--a situation which may not physically or economically meaningful. If you are not particularly interested in what would happen if al