Multiple Standard Error Of Estimate Equation
Contents |
is used to predict a single dependent variable (Y). The predicted value of Y is a linear transformation of the X variables such that the sum of squared deviations of the observed and predicted Y is a minimum. The computations are more complex, however, because the interrelationships among all the variables must be taken into account in the weights
Multiple Regression Example In Excel
assigned to the variables. The interpretation of the results of a multiple regression analysis is also more complex multiple regression example problems for the same reason. With two independent variables the prediction of Y is expressed by the following equation: Y'i = b0 + b1X1i + b2X2i Note that multiple regression equation example this transformation is similar to the linear transformation of two variables discussed in the previous chapter except that the w's have been replaced with b's and the X'i has been replaced with a Y'i. The "b" values are called regression weights and are computed
Standard Error Multiple Regression
in a way that minimizes the sum of squared deviations in the same manner as in simple linear regression. The difference is that in simple linear regression only two weights, the intercept (b0) and slope (b1), were estimated, while in this case, three weights (b0, b1, and b2) are estimated. EXAMPLE DATA The data used to illustrate the inner workings of multiple regression will be generated from the "Example Student." The data are presented below: Homework Assignment 21 Example Student PSY645 Dr. Stockburger Due
Multiple Regression Equation With 3 Variables
Date
Y1 Y2 X1 X2 X3 X4 125 113 13 18 25 11 158 115 39 18 59 30 207 126 52 50 62 53 182 119 29 43 50 29 196 107 50 37 65 56 175 135 64 19 79 49 145 111 11 27 17 14 144 130 22 23 31 17 160 122 30 18 34 22 175 114 51 11 58 40 151 121 27 15 29 31 161 105 41 22 53 39 200 131 51 52 75 36 173 123 37 36 44 27 175 121 23 48 27 20 162 120 43 15 65 36 155 109 38 19 62 37 230 130 62 56 75 50 162 134 28 30 36 20 153 124 30 25 41 33 The example data can be obtained as a text file and as an SPSS/WIN file from this web page.it comes to determining how well a linear model fits the data. However, I've stated previously that R-squared is overrated. Is there a different multiple correlation coefficient formula goodness-of-fit statistic that can be more helpful? You bet! Today, I’ll highlight
How To Calculate Multiple Regression By Hand
a sorely underappreciated regression statistic: S, or the standard error of the regression. S provides important information that multiple correlation coefficient in r R-squared does not. What is the Standard Error of the Regression (S)? S becomes smaller when the data points are closer to the line. In the regression output for Minitab http://www.psychstat.missouristate.edu/multibook/mlt06m.html statistical software, you can find S in the Summary of Model section, right next to R-squared. Both statistics provide an overall measure of how well the model fits the data. S is known both as the standard error of the regression and as the standard error of the estimate. S represents the average distance that the observed values fall from the http://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics/regression-analysis-how-to-interpret-s-the-standard-error-of-the-regression regression line. Conveniently, it tells you how wrong the regression model is on average using the units of the response variable. Smaller values are better because it indicates that the observations are closer to the fitted line. The fitted line plot shown above is from my post where I use BMI to predict body fat percentage. S is 3.53399, which tells us that the average distance of the data points from the fitted line is about 3.5% body fat. Unlike R-squared, you can use the standard error of the regression to assess the precision of the predictions. Approximately 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 2*standard error of the regression from the regression line, which is also a quick approximation of a 95% prediction interval. For the BMI example, about 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 7% of the fitted line, which is a close match for the prediction interval. Why I Like the Standard Error of the Regression (S) In many cases, I prefer the standard error of the regression over R-squared. I love the prac
Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/27916/standard-errors-for-multiple-regression-coefficients or posting ads with us Cross Validated Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Standard errors for multiple regression coefficients? up vote 7 down vote favorite multiple regression 3 I realize that this is a very basic question, but I can't find an answer anywhere. I'm computing regression coefficients using either the normal equations or QR decomposition. How can I compute standard errors for each coefficient? I usually think of standard errors as being computed as: $SE_\bar{x}\ = \frac{\sigma_{\bar x}}{\sqrt{n}}$ What is $\sigma_{\bar x}$ for each coefficient? What is the most efficient way to compute this in the context of OLS? standard-error regression-coefficients share|improve this question asked May 7 multiple regression example '12 at 1:21 Belmont 4083613 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 12 down vote When doing least squares estimation (assuming a normal random component) the regression parameter estimates are normally distributed with mean equal to the true regression parameter and covariance matrix $\Sigma = s^2\cdot(X^TX)^{-1}$ where $s^2$ is the residual variance and $X^TX$ is the design matrix. $X^T$ is the transpose of $X$ and $X$ is defined by the model equation $Y=X\beta+\epsilon$ with $\beta$ the regression parameters and $\epsilon$ is the error term. The estimated standard deviation of a beta parameter is gotten by taking the corresponding term in $(X^TX)^{-1}$ multiplying it by the sample estimate of the residual variance and then taking the square root. This is not a very simple calculation but any software package will compute it for you and provide it in the output. Example On page 134 of Draper and Smith (referenced in my comment), they provide the following data for fitting by least squares a model $Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X + \varepsilon$ where $\varepsilon \sim N(0, \mathbb{I}\sigma^2)$. X Y XY 0 -2 0 2 0 0 2 2 4 5 1 5 5 3 15 9 1 9 9 0 0 9 0 0 9 1 9 10 -1 -10 --- -- --- Sum 60 5 32 Sum of Squares 482 21 528 Looks like an example where the slope should be close to 0. $$X^t = \
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:25:31 GMT by s_ac5 (squid/3.5.20)