Nlog Error Errorexception
Contents |
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 244 Star 1,930 Fork 674 NLog/NLog Code Issues 187 Pull requests 22 Projects nlog exception layout 3 Wiki Pulse Graphs New issue "Right" way to log exceptions #431 nlog exception stack trace Closed MgSam opened this Issue Oct 20, 2014 · 20 comments Projects None yet Labels almost ready
Nlog Layout Examples
discussion enhancement must have work in progress Milestone 4.0 Assignees 304NotModified 8 participants MgSam commented Oct 20, 2014 The onexception and exception layout renderers seem to
Nlog Inner Exception
only do anything if one of the logger methods with "exception" in the name are called. However, those logger methods with "exception" are now deprecated. So what is the "right" way to log exceptions now? Passing the exception into one of the normal log methods (Warn(), Error(), Fatal()) does not include the stacktrace as part of the message. Maybe nlog onexception there should be an onerrororabove layout renderer? DavidDeSloovere commented Oct 20, 2014 I would think this is actually a bug. Crypth commented Oct 24, 2014 I'm also curious about this. Calling Fatal(string, Exception) is fine as long as it's an Exception and not some inheriting class. Calling it with some other Exception that inherits Exception requires a formatstring in string, or casting the other type of Exception to Exception. Basically, my question is, should you: catch (WebException webExcption) { NLogger.Fatal("z0Mg! {0}", webException); } or NLogger.Fatal("z0Mg! ", (Exception)webExcption); Xharze commented Oct 25, 2014 I'm working on a fix, it's because of the overloads on the logging methods. DavidDeSloovere commented Nov 17, 2014 @Xharze any progress on the fix? Xharze commented Nov 19, 2014 Unfortunately I haven't had time to look into this yet, but it is a top priority Xharze added a commit to Xharze/NLog that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2014 Xharze … resolves #431 Nlog Exception Data Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with nlog stack trace example us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is nlog default layout a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up NLog LogException seems to ignore the exception up vote 27 down vote favorite https://github.com/NLog/NLog/issues/431 4 LogException or any of the derived functions like ErrorException etc. seem to totally ignore the exception parameter passed in. Am I missing a format attribute in my nlog.config file? I am using the boilerplate from the template that Nlog installs in VS. I would expect information from the exception object AND inner exceptions to be added to the log file. Yet the only information added to the log file http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5566685/nlog-logexception-seems-to-ignore-the-exception is the string parameter passed to the function. Turns out that ErrorException() is actually less useful than Error() How can I get more in depth reporting. Particularly a full recursive dump of the Message property of all inner Exceptions? logging nlog exception-logging share|improve this question edited Sep 28 '12 at 7:48 Nasreddine 18.4k104174 asked Apr 6 '11 at 12:54 Rabbi 1,56942330 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 35 down vote accepted Add or replace the ${exception} tag in the layout config to ${exception:format=tostring}