Asp.net Vb On Error Resume Next
Contents |
Forum Visual Basic Programming Visual Basic .NET Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register or Login vb on error resume next example before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select vba on error resume next the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Results 1 to 14 of 14 Thread: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" vbscript on error resume next in VB.NEt Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode August 23rd, 2006,07:03 AM #1 rahulvasanth View Profile View Forum Posts Member Join Date c# on error resume next Sep 2004 Posts 265 Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt Hi I was using "On Error Resume Next" in VB to avoid certain errors. I want to know the equivalent of "On Error Resume Next" in VB.Net. Thanking in advance Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,07:30 AM #2 Kevin McFarlane View Profile View Forum Posts Member Join Date Jun 1999 Posts 153 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt There isn't any. Kevin Reply With Quote
Sql On Error Resume Next
August 23rd, 2006,07:35 AM #3 HanneSThEGreaT View Profile View Forum Posts CG Bouncer Power Poster Join Date Jul 2001 Location Sunny South Africa Posts 11,223 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt Try and Catch blocks would be the more prefferred and appropriate way of Error handling Rahul. have a look at these FAQ's, Exception Handling is covered there as well : http://www.codeguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=368148 More specifically, here's the link to the Exception Handling FAQ : http://www.codeguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=383057 Hope it helps! All my Articles Hannes Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,07:37 AM #4 rahulvasanth View Profile View Forum Posts Member Join Date Sep 2004 Posts 265 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt In VB.NEt How can I continue execution even if an exception occurs. (I don't want the exception to be displayed on the screen). The application should continue executing the next line of code. Thanking in advance Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,07:38 AM #5 HanneSThEGreaT View Profile View Forum Posts CG Bouncer Power Poster Join Date Jul 2001 Location Sunny South Africa Posts 11,223 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt Did you read my previous post in this Thread, post #3, Rahul ¿ All my Articles Hannes Reply With Quote August 23rd, 2006,08:47 AM #6 klintan View Profile View Forum Posts Member + Join Date Apr 2005 Posts 576 Re: Alternative for "On Error Resume Next" in VB.NEt It
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more
Visual Basic On Error Resume Next
about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads vba on error resume next turn off with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow vba on error resume next not working is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up What is the best alternative “On Error Resume Next” for C#? up http://forums.codeguru.com/showthread.php?398008-Alternative-for-quot-On-Error-Resume-Next-quot-in-VB-NEt vote 12 down vote favorite 2 If I put empty catch blocks for my C# code, is it going to be an equivalent for VB.NET's "On Error Resume Next" statement. try { C# code; } catch(exception) { } The reason I am asking this is because I have to convert a VB.NET code to C#, and the old code has ~200 "On Error Resume Next" statements although I am http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4825422/what-is-the-best-alternative-on-error-resume-next-for-c using a proper try {} catch {} in my new code, but is there is a better alternative? c# vb.net error-handling vb.net-to-c# share|improve this question edited Oct 25 '12 at 16:11 Peter Mortensen 10.2k1369107 asked Jan 28 '11 at 6:15 Neel 67121026 12 The lack of an alternative to On Error Resume Next wasn't just an unintentional oversight... Why do you possibly need this? If you explain the motivation behind your thoughts of doing this, I'm sure that someone here could give you a better solution. –Cody Gray Jan 28 '11 at 6:17 @Cody Gray - updated the reason of asking. Thanks –Neel Jan 28 '11 at 6:31 2 @MarkJ: Because even if (s)he leaves the code as VB.NET, it's still a good idea to replace On Error Goto Next with more structured exception handling (or none at all). –Cody Gray Jan 29 '11 at 2:04 4 @Cody It is an improvement to replace the error handling, but you have to assess how long it will take (how much it will cost) and whether the code needs substantial modifications. If the code works & doesn't need changing, there may be better things to do with the time instead. –MarkJ Jan 29
On Error Resume Next for VB.Net If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum http://forums.devx.com/showthread.php?156898-On-Error-Resume-Next-for-VB-Net that you want to visit from the selection below. Results 1 to 10 of 10 Thread: On Error Resume Next for VB.Net Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page… Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?472877-RESOLVED-Try-Catch-Resume-Next Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode 10-30-2006,04:34 PM #1 jcb1269 View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date Jul 2004 Posts 366 On Error Resume Next for VB.Net Hi Again, Is there a replacement for On Error Resume on error Next? If I get an error early in the routine that's no big deal and I want it to keep going what do I do? Where's a good page that talks about this? Thanks all. jb Reply With Quote 10-30-2006,05:51 PM #2 Phil Weber View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage Senior Member Join Date Nov 2003 Location Portland, OR Posts 8,387 You can use a Try...Catch block with nothing in the Catch: Code: Try ' Code that causes error on error resume here Catch ' Ignore error End Try Phil Weber http://www.philweber.com Please post questions to the forums, where others may benefit. I do not offer free assistance by e-mail. Thank you! Reply With Quote 10-30-2006,07:03 PM #3 David Anton View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage Registered User Join Date Jul 2004 Posts 81 One note about Phil's answer is that you'd have to do that for each single line of code where you want to ignore the exception. Also note that you can still use "On Error Resume Next", but you can't mix it with structured exception handling in the same method. Of course, "On Error Resume Next" may not be acceptable to you, but it's good to be aware of your options! David Anton Convert between VB, C#, C++, & Java www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com Instant C# - VB to C# Converter Instant VB - C# to VB Converter Reply With Quote 10-30-2006,07:28 PM #4 Phil Weber View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage Senior Member Join Date Nov 2003 Location Portland, OR Posts 8,387 > ...each single line of code... Can't you put several lines of code in the Try block, if you want to ignore errors for the entire block? Phil Weber http://www.philweber.com Please post questions to the forums, where others may benefit. I do not offer free assistance by e-mail. Thank you! Reply With Quote 10-30-2006,07:47 PM #5 David Anton View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Home
this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Results 1 to 15 of 15 Thread: [RESOLVED] Try Catch - Resume Next? Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Jun 7th, 2007,11:25 AM #1 tim8w View Profile View Forum Posts Thread Starter Addicted Member Join Date Nov 2004 Posts 195 [RESOLVED] Try Catch - Resume Next? I have a case where I need to resume execution on the next line after an exception. Is there no way to do this using the structured error handling? I realize that I can go back to the "On Error .. Goto", but I can't believe there's not a way to do this with structured error handling... Reply With Quote Jun 7th, 2007,11:48 AM #2 Troy Lundin View Profile View Forum Posts Hyperactive Member Join Date May 2006 Posts 489 Re: Try Catch - Resume Next? The main point of Try...Catch blocks is to catch an error then exit the function. You can use Finally to execute remaining code whether or not an error occurred. Like vb.net Code: Try' Some codeCatch aex As ArgumentException' Some exception codeFinally' Can be used to dispose of objects created in this method. Prefix has no suffix, but suffix has a prefix. Reply With Quote Jun 7th, 2007,11:50 AM #3 GaryMazzone View Profile View Forum Posts #28 for the Yanks coming Join Date Aug 2005 Location Dover,NH Posts 7,108 Re: Try Catch - Resume Next? You could try and place a Try Catch around the statement with nothing in the Catch area: Try Statement Here Catch ex as Execption End Try Sometimes the Programmer Sometimes the DBA Mazz1 Reply With Quote Jun 7th, 2007,11:52 AM #4 MeanMachine View Profile View Forum Posts New Member Join Date Apr 2007 Posts 8 Re: Try Catch - Resume Next? Well, why not use Exit Sub or Exit Try which will also keep you moving along. Reply With Quote Jun 7th, 2007,11:56 AM #5 Troy Lundin View Profile View Forum Posts Hyperactive Member Join Date May 2006 Posts 489 Re: Try Catch - Resume Next? You could try and place a Try C