C On Error Resume
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the c# on error resume next workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack powershell on error resume next Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs on error resume next in qtp Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; on error resume vba it only takes a minute: Sign up I miss Visual Basic's “On Error Resume Next” in C#. How should I be handing errors now? up vote 12 down vote favorite In Visual Basic I wrote just On Error Resume Next in the head of my program and errors were suppressed in the entire project. Here in C# I miss
On Error Resume Next Vbs
this feature very much. The usual try-catch handling for every single procedure is not only very time-intensive, it brings undesired effects. If an error is encountered, even if handled, the code doesn't continue from the point it occurred. With On Error Resume Next, the code continued from the point of error, skipping just the function call that caused the error. I am not deeply involved with C# yet, but maybe there exists in C# a better error handling than the primitive try-catch. I also would like to have the module or function name where the error occured as well as the the line number in my error message. The Exception class doesn't provide that features as far I know. Any ideas (managed, of course, without involving any process classes on my own application)? How do you handle the errors in bigger projects? I hope I do not have to add a try-catch to each method. Somehow C# throws many errors - that seems to be typical of the language. My Solution which I found to re-solve sev
bashaApril 18, 20100 0 0 0 Syed Aslam Basha here from the Information Security Tools Team. We have “On Error Resume Next” feature in
On Error Resume Next Vbscript Example
VB.NET, which simply means during execution if error occurs on error resume next not working with the current code step just go to next code step by passing the on error resume next vba excel error. As such there is no “On Error Resume Next” in C#, but we can achieve the same using try catch statements tactically as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11596045/i-miss-visual-basics-on-error-resume-next-in-c-how-should-i-be-handing-erro ; 1: try 2: { 3: File.Delete(FileNameWithPath); 4: } 5: 6: catch() 7: { 8: // do nothing 9: } A difference is still that in C# this works only for a single statement. You would need to repeat the block for each statement. However, it is https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/syedab/2010/04/18/on-error-resume-next-in-c/ not a good practice. -Syed Aslam Basha (syedab@microsoft.com) Microsoft Information Security Tools (IST) Team Test Lead -------------------------------------- Please leave a comment if the blog post has helped you. Tags .NET Comments (0) Cancel reply Name * Email * Website Follow UsPopular TagsSoftware Testing Automation Information Security Tools VS 2010 C# Visual Studio CUIT CAT.NET XSS ASP.NET Performance testing how to .NET Microsoft Test Manager 2010 How to prevent XSS attacks using Microsoft Anti-XSS library SQL Injection Performance testing basics How to prevent XSS attacks using Microsoft Anti-XSS SRE Performance testing strategies Threat Modeling Securing web applications Archives January 2012(1) December 2011(1) November 2011(1) October 2011(1) September 2011(1) August 2011(1) July 2011(1) June 2011(1) May 2011(1) April 2011(1) All of 2012(1) All of 2011(12) All of 2010(27) All of 2009(33) Privacy & Cookies Terms of Use Trademarks © 2016 Microsoft
Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 418,461 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy. Do we have "on error resume next" in C#? https://bytes.com/topic/c-sharp/answers/563309-do-we-have-error-resume-next-c P: n/a Maxwell2006 Hi, I know that this is not a good practice, but I wonder do we have "on error resume next" in C#? Thanks, Max Nov 13 '06 #1 Post Reply Share this Question 11 Replies P: n/a ssamuel Max, No. Are you nuts? :) Seriously, no, there isn't, and all for the reasons that you'd expect. There's really a whole lot you can do with try/catch blocks. Carefully constructed code could do the on error same and more. Ask if you have a specific need that someone may be able to help with. Stephan Maxwell2006 wrote: Hi, I know that this is not a good practice, but I wonder do we have "on error resume next" in C#? Thanks, Max Nov 13 '06 #2 P: n/a Merlin I know that this is not a good practice, but I wonder do we have "on error resume next" in C#? Try..catch..finally is on error resume the best way... "on error resume next" would be something horrible :-) -- //\/\\3rL1n_______ Nov 13 '06 #3 P: n/a Jon Skeet [C# MVP] Maxwell2006