Package Amsmath Error Latex
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the
Mathit Allowed Only In Math Mode
company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us TeX - LaTeX package amsmath error erroneous nesting of equation structures align Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of math mode latex TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the
Align Latex
top Amsmath error occurs up vote 0 down vote favorite I have error ! Missing } inserted. } l.9 { -1+2/[1+3\exp(-2|J|/k_BT)],& $T MWE \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:Cd} \tilde C(T)= \begin{cases} { -1+2/[1+3\exp(-2|J|/k_BT)],& $T brackets and the dollar signs, the document compiles with amsmath. –Andrew Uzzell Nov 28 '12 at 12:00 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 5 down vote accepted The problem is you are trying to use math inside math: $T here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn latex math symbols more about hiring developers or posting ads with us TeX - LaTeX Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top “\bar allowed only in math mode” http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/84627/amsmath-error-occurs error up vote 2 down vote favorite When I run \begin{align*} \textit{m}(A) &=a&, \\ \textit{\bar{A}} &=1-a& \\ \textit{m}(B) &=0& &\text{for} B \neq A \text{ or} B \neq \bar{A} \end{align*} I get the following error: ! Package amsmath Error: \bar allowed only in math mode.See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.Type H here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/50266/error-while-using-amsmath-package have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us TeX - LaTeX Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, package amsmath ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top error while using amsmath package up vote 6 down vote favorite I try to run this: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \renewcommand\thesection{\arabic{section}.} \makeatletter \renewcommand{\section}{ package amsmath error \@startsection {section}{1}{0mm} {\baselineskip}% {\baselineskip} {\fontsize{14}{14}\centering\bfseries\MakeUppercase} }% \makeatother \begin{document} \tableofcontents \section{A} \end{document} and I get a message that something's wrong with '.toc' file, so what's wrong? Why does this not like amsmath package? sectioning amsmath share|improve this question edited Mar 31 '12 at 22:08 Caramdir 54.3k13183255 asked Mar 31 '12 at 22:05 Pavasaris 1,07131532 @egreg's answer was quicker by half a second, and more complete so I removed mine. –David Carlisle Mar 31 '12 at 22:40 Please consider accepting the answer by clicking the tick button below the voting arrows on the left side. By doing so you will conclude the question. If there is still something missing in the answer please state so. –Martin Scharrer♦ May 7 '12 at 13:12 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 8 down vote accepted It subtly depends on the fact that amsmath redefines \@ifnextchar. In practical terms, you have a spurious space that the kernel version of that internal command removes, while the amsmath version doesn'tIn Latex