Home > proportional reduction > proportional reduction of error statistic

Proportional Reduction Of Error Statistic

Contents

of making observations which are possibly subject to errors of all types. Such measures quantify how much having the observations available has reduced the loss proportional reduction in error lambda (cost) of the uncertainty about the intended quantity compared with not having proportional reduction in error stata those observations. Proportional reduction in error is a more restrictive framework widely used in statistics, in which proportional reduction in error definition the general loss function is replaced by a more direct measure of error such as the mean square error. Examples are the coefficient of determination and Goodman and Kruskal's

Proportional Reduction In Error Formula

lambda.[1] The concept of proportional reduction in loss was proposed by Bruce Cooil and Roland T. Rust in their 1994 paper. Many commonly used reliability measures for quantitative data (such as continuous data in an experimental design) are PRL measures, including Cronbach's alpha and measures proposed by Ben J. Winer (1971). It also provides a general way of proportional reduction in error calculator developing measures for the reliability of qualitative data. For example, this framework provides several possible measures that are applicable when a researcher wants to assess the consensus between judges who are asked to code a number of items into mutually exclusive qualitative categories (Cooil and Rust, 1995). Measures of this latter type have been proposed by several researchers, including Perrault and Leigh (1989). References[edit] ^ Upton G., Cook, I. (2006) Oxford Dictionary of Statistics, OUP. ISBN 978-0-19-954145-4 Cooil, B., and Rust, R. T. (1994), "Reliability and Expected Loss: A Unifying Principle," Psychometrika, 59, 203-216. (available here) Cooil, B., and Rust, R. T. (1995), "General Estimators for the Reliability of Qualitative Data," Psychometrika, 60, 199-220. (available here) Rust, R. T., and Cooil, B. (1994), "Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications," Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1), 1-14. (available here) Winer, B.J. (1971), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill. Perreault, W.D. and Leigh, L.E. (1989), “Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135-148 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti

PRE proportional reduction of error example measures. Proportional Reduction of Error (PRE) The

The Proportionate Reduction In Error Is A Measure Of The Quizlet

concept that underlies the definition and interpretation of several measures

Proportionate Reduction In Error Symbol

of association, PRE measures are derived by comparing the errors made in predicting the dependent while ignoring the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional_reduction_in_loss independent variable with errors made when making predictions that use information about the independent variable. E1 = errors of prediction made when the independent variable is ignored E2 = errors of prediction made when the prediction https://learn.bu.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-826908-dt-content-rid-2073693_1/courses/13sprgmetcj702_ol/week05/metcj702_W05S03T02_proportional.html is based on the independent variable "All PRE measures are based on comparing predictive error levels that result from each of two methods of prediction" (Frankfort-Nachmias and Leon-Guerrero 2011:366). Table 12.1 on page 366 of the textbook helps us to understand this. The independent variable is number of children; the dependent variable is support for abortion. Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player. Two of the most commonly used PRE measures of association are lambda (λ) and gamma (γ). Two PRE Measures: Lambda and Gamma Lambda λ Appropriate for: Nominal Variables Gamma γ Appropriate for: Ordinal and Dichotomous Nominal Variables

PRE, proportional reduction of errorPRE, proportional reduction of error having a mental medical condition financial status   relatively bad relatively good total yes 390 (97,5 %) http://www.tankonyvtar.hu/en/tartalom/tamop425/0010_2A_21_Nemeth_Renata-Simon_David_Tarsadalomstatisztika_magyar_es_angol_nyelven_eng/ch08s02.html 10 (2,5 %) 400 (100 %) no 40 (6,7 %) 560 (93,3 %) 600 (100 %) total 430 (43 %) 570 (57 %) 1000 (100 %)  Using one of the illustrations from the previous lecture (where we considered mental health to be the independent variable and financial status to be the dependent variable), let’s guess the financial status of the individual proportional reduction respondents based on our knowledge of the distribution: 57% have relatively good, 43% have relatively worse financial status.Let’s imagine that the respondents turn up one by one and we have to guess their financial status as accurately as possible. What’s the best way to do that? having a mental medical condition financial status   relatively bad relatively good total yes 390 (97,5 reduction in error %) 10 (2,5 %) 400 (100 %) no 40 (6,7 %) 560 (93,3 %) 600 (100 %) total 430 (43 %) 570 (57 %) 1000 (100 %) Declareing each respondent to have a relatively good financial status is the safest way: thus we are wrong in 430 cases out of 1000.How does the situation change if we already know Table 1 and we can ask each respondent whether or not they have a mental medical condition?In this case we can improve the chances of our guesswork by categorizing everyone with a mental problem as having worse financial status, while those without mental problems as having better financial status. Thus the number of mistakes we make is down to 50.In other words, the guessing error characterizes the relationship of the two variables. Associational indices that work on this principle are called ’proportional reduction of error’ (PRE) indices.Calculating (λ) to get the connection of two nominal variables:8.1. egyenlet - Where:E1 is the number of categorising mistakes made without considering the independent variableE2 is the number of categorising mistakes made considering the independent variable havi

be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:27:02 GMT by s_wx1085 (squid/3.5.20)

 

Related content

chi-square and proportional reduction of error

Chi-square And Proportional Reduction Of Error table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Definition a li li a href Proportional Reduction Of Error Example a li li a href Contingency Coefficient Definition a li ul td tr tbody table p with SPSS span Politically-Oriented Web-Enhanced Research Methods for Undergraduates Topics Tools span span Resources for introductory research methods courses in political science and related disciplines span span p Getting Started Topics Tools Codebooks Downloads Other Resources Home Site Map relatedl Introduction Note to Instructors Course Syllabus Using POWERMUTT

error in proportional reduction statistics

Error In Proportional Reduction Statistics table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Pre Statistics a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Stata a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Calculator a li li a href Proportionate Reduction In Error Symbol a li ul td tr tbody table p PRE p h id Pre Statistics p measures Proportional Reduction of Error PRE The proportional reduction in error lambda concept that underlies the definition and interpretation of several measures p h id Proportional Reduction In Error Stata p of association

proportional reduction error pre

Proportional Reduction Error Pre table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Formula a li li a href Proportional Reduction Calculator a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Stata a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Spss a li ul td tr tbody table p Login Username Password Remember me Forgot your login information Reset your password relatedl Other Login Options OpenAthens Shibboleth Can't login Find p h id Proportional Reduction In Error Formula p out how to access the site Search form Advanced Back

proportional reduction in error statistics

Proportional Reduction In Error Statistics p PRE measures Proportional Reduction of Error PRE The concept that underlies the definition and interpretation of several measures of association PRE measures are derived by comparing the errors made in predicting the dependent while ignoring the independent variable with errors made when making predictions that use information about the independent variable E errors of prediction made when the independent variable is ignored E errors of prediction made when the prediction is based on the independent variable All PRE measures are based on comparing predictive error levels that result from each of two methods of

proportional reduction in error spss

Proportional Reduction In Error Spss table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Lambda a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Definition a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Formula a li li a href Proportional Reduction Of Error Example a li ul td tr tbody table p StatisticsGraphsExamining Relationships Among VariablesCrosstabulationsMeasures of Association and CorrelationChi-Square Test of IndependenceExamining Differences Between GroupsANOVAT- tests Search for Measures of Association relatedl and Correlation Note if you click on an image p h id Proportional Reduction In Error

proportional reduction of error lambda

Proportional Reduction Of Error Lambda table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Proportional Reduction Calculator a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Stata a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Interpretation a li ul td tr tbody table p of making observations which are possibly subject to errors of all types Such measures quantify how much having the observations available relatedl has reduced the loss cost of the uncertainty about proportional reduction in error formula the intended quantity compared with not having those observations Proportional reduction in proportionate

proportional reduction of error pre

Proportional Reduction Of Error Pre table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Lambda a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Stata a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Spss a li ul td tr tbody table p Login Username Password Remember me Forgot your login information Reset your relatedl password Other Login Options OpenAthens Shibboleth Can't login proportional reduction in error formula Find out how to access the site Search form Advanced Back p h id Proportional Reduction In Error Lambda p Browse Browse

proportional reduction in error definition statistics

Proportional Reduction In Error Definition Statistics table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Stata a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Calculator a li li a href Proportionate Reduction In Error Symbol a li li a href Proportional Reduction Calculator a li ul td tr tbody table p PRE proportional reduction in error lambda measures Proportional Reduction of Error PRE The p h id Proportional Reduction In Error Stata p concept that underlies the definition and interpretation of several measures proportional reduction in error formula of

proportional reduction of error gamma

Proportional Reduction Of Error Gamma table id toc tbody tr td div id toctitle Contents div ul li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Lambda a li li a href Proportional Reduction Calculator a li li a href Proportionate Reduction In Error Can Be Symbolized By a li li a href Proportional Reduction In Error Stata a li ul td tr tbody table p the relationship between two nominal or ordinal variables This lesson focuses on single number statistics that also indicate the strength and relatedl direction of relationships between nominal or ordinal level variables proportional reduction in error statistics