Exceptions Error
Contents |
you have probably seen some. There are (at least) two distinguishable kinds of errors: syntax errors and exceptions. 8.1. Syntax python exception class Errors¶ Syntax errors, also known as parsing errors, are perhaps the most python exception message common kind of complaint you get while you are still learning Python: >>> while True print 'Hello
Python Raise Custom Exception
world' File "
Python Exception Stack Trace
earliest point in the line where the error was detected. The error is caused by (or at least detected at) the token preceding the arrow: in the example, the error is detected at the keyword print, since a colon (':') is missing before it. File name and line number are printed so you know where to python print exception look in case the input came from a script. 8.2. Exceptions¶ Even if a statement or expression is syntactically correct, it may cause an error when an attempt is made to execute it. Errors detected during execution are called exceptions and are not unconditionally fatal: you will soon learn how to handle them in Python programs. Most exceptions are not handled by programs, however, and result in error messages as shown here: >>> 10 * (1/0) Traceback (most recent call last): File " is a good introduction to some of the issues of writing robust generic components: D. Abrahams: ``Exception Safety in Generic Components'', originally published in M. Jazayeri, R. Loos, D. Musser (eds.): Generic Programming, Proc. of a Dagstuhl Seminar, Lecture syntax for generic except clause in python Notes on Computer Science. Volume. 1766 Guidelines When should I use exceptions? The simple answer is: ``whenever the sys exc_info semantic and performance characteristics of exceptions are appropriate.'' An oft-cited guideline is to ask yourself the question ``is this an exceptional (or unexpected) situation?'' This guideline has an attractive ring https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/errors.html to it, but is usually a mistake. The problem is that one person's ``exceptional'' is another's ``expected'': when you really look at the terms carefully, the distinction evaporates and you're left with no guideline. After all, if you check for an error condition, then in some sense you expect it to happen, or the check is wasted code. A more appropriate http://www.boost.org/community/error_handling.html question to ask is: ``do we want stack unwinding here?'' Because actually handling an exception is likely to be significantly slower than executing mainline code, you should also ask: ``Can I afford stack unwinding here?'' For example, a desktop application performing a long computation might periodically check to see whether the user had pressed a cancel button. Throwing an exception could allow the operation to be cancelled gracefully. On the other hand, it would probably be inappropriate to throw and handle exceptions in the inner loop of this computation because that could have a significant performance impact. The guideline mentioned above has a grain of truth in it: in time critical code, throwing an exception should be the exception, not the rule. How should I design my exception classes? Derive your exception class from std::exception. Except in *very* rare circumstances where you can't afford the cost of a virtual table, std::exception makes a reasonable exception base class, and when used universally, allows programmers to catch "everything" without resorting to catch(...). For more about catch(...), see below. Use virtual inheritance. This insig in Haskell-Cafe and more and more packages that handle errors and exceptions or something between. Although both terms are related and sometimes hard to distinguish, https://wiki.haskell.org/Error_vs._Exception it is important to do it carefully. This is like the confusion between parallelism and concurrency. The first problem is that "exception" seems to me to be the historically younger term. Before there were only "errors", independent of whether they were programming, I/O or user errors. In this article we use the term exception for expected but irregular situations at runtime and python exception the term error for mistakes in the running program that can be resolved only by fixing the program. We do not want to distinguish between different ways of representing exceptions: Maybe, Either, exceptions in IO monad, or return codes, they all represent exceptions and are worth considering for exception handling. The history may have led to the identifiers we find today in python exception class the Haskell language and standard Haskell modules. Exceptions: Prelude.catch, Control.Exception.catch, Control.Exception.try, IOError, Control.Monad.Error Errors: error, assert, Control.Exception.catch, Debug.Trace.trace Note, that the catch function from Prelude handles exclusively exceptions, whereas its counterpart from Control.Exception also catches certain kinds of undefined values. Prelude> catch (error "bla") (\msg -> putStrLn $ "caught " ++ show msg) *** Exception: bla Prelude> Control.Exception.catch (error "bla") (\msg -> putStrLn $ "caught " ++ show (msg::Control.Exception.SomeException)) caught bla This is unsafe, since Haskell's error is just sugar for undefined, that shall help spotting a programming error. A program should work as well when all errors and undefineds are replaced by infinite loops. However infinite loops in general cannot be caught, whereas calls to sugared functions like error can. Even more confusion was initiated by the Java programming language to use the term "exceptions" for programming errors like the NullPointerException and introducing the distinction between checked and unchecked exceptions. Contents 1 Examples 2 When exceptions become errors 3 When errors become exceptions 4 Errors and type system 5 Call stacks 6 Escaping from control structures 7 See also 1 Examples Let's Python Catch Multiple Exceptions