Lambda Proportional Reduction Error
Contents |
PRE proportional reduction in error formula measures. Proportional Reduction of Error (PRE) The proportionate reduction in error symbol concept that underlies the definition and interpretation of several measures proportional reduction calculator of association, PRE measures are derived by comparing the errors made in predicting the dependent while ignoring the
Proportional Reduction In Error Stata
independent variable with errors made when making predictions that use information about the independent variable. E1 = errors of prediction made when the independent variable is ignored E2 = errors of prediction made when the prediction a simple way to calculate proportionate reduction in error is by: is based on the independent variable "All PRE measures are based on comparing predictive error levels that result from each of two methods of prediction" (Frankfort-Nachmias and Leon-Guerrero 2011:366). Table 12.1 on page 366 of the textbook helps us to understand this. The independent variable is number of children; the dependent variable is support for abortion. Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player. Two of the most commonly used PRE measures of association are lambda (λ) and gamma (γ). Two PRE Measures: Lambda and Gamma Lambda λ Appropriate for: Nominal Variables Gamma γ Appropriate for: Ordinal and Dichotomous Nominal Variables
of making observations which are possibly subject to errors of all types. Such measures quantify how much having proportionate reduction in error can be symbolized by the observations available has reduced the loss (cost) of the
Proportional Reduction In Error Interpretation
uncertainty about the intended quantity compared with not having those observations. Proportional reduction in error is
Regression To The Mean Occurs Because Extreme Scores Tend To Become:
a more restrictive framework widely used in statistics, in which the general loss function is replaced by a more direct measure of error such as https://learn.bu.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-826908-dt-content-rid-2073693_1/courses/13sprgmetcj702_ol/week05/metcj702_W05S03T02_proportional.html the mean square error. Examples are the coefficient of determination and Goodman and Kruskal's lambda.[1] The concept of proportional reduction in loss was proposed by Bruce Cooil and Roland T. Rust in their 1994 paper. Many commonly used reliability measures for quantitative data (such as continuous data in an experimental design) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional_reduction_in_loss are PRL measures, including Cronbach's alpha and measures proposed by Ben J. Winer (1971). It also provides a general way of developing measures for the reliability of qualitative data. For example, this framework provides several possible measures that are applicable when a researcher wants to assess the consensus between judges who are asked to code a number of items into mutually exclusive qualitative categories (Cooil and Rust, 1995). Measures of this latter type have been proposed by several researchers, including Perrault and Leigh (1989). References[edit] ^ Upton G., Cook, I. (2006) Oxford Dictionary of Statistics, OUP. ISBN 978-0-19-954145-4 Cooil, B., and Rust, R. T. (1994), "Reliability and Expected Loss: A Unifying Principle," Psychometrika, 59, 203-216. (available here) Cooil, B., and Rust, R. T. (1995), "General Estimators for the Reliability of Qualitative Data," Psychometrika, 60, 199-220. (available here) Rust, R. T., and Cooil, B. (1994), "Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications
or Create About News Subscriber Services Contact Us Help For Authors: A Community of Experts Oxford Reference http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100349896 Publications Pages Publications Pages Help Search http://commons.esc.edu/spss/examining-relationships-among-variables/measures-of-association/ within my subject specializations: Select ... Select your specializations: Select All / Clear Selections Archaeology Art & Architecture Bilingual dictionaries Classical studies Encyclopedias Geographical reference English Dictionaries and Thesauri History Ancient history (non-classical to 500 CE) reduction in Early history (500 CE to 1500) Early Modern History (1500 to 1700) modern history (1700 to 1945) Contemporary History (post 1945) Military History Regional and National History Local and Family History Language reference History of English Usage and Grammar Guides Writing and Editing Guides Law History reduction in error of Law Human Rights and Immigration International Law Linguistics Literature Bibliography Children's literature studies Literary studies (early and medieval) Literary studies (19th century) Literary studies (20th century onwards) Literary studies - fiction, novelists, and prose writers Literary studies - plays and playwrights Literary studies - poetry and poets Literary theory and cultural studies Shakespeare studies and criticism Media studies Medicine and health Clinical Medicine Dentistry Public Health and Epidemiology Surgery Psychiatry Music Opera Names studies Performing arts Dance Theatre Philosophy Quotations Religion Science and technology Astronomy and Cosmology Chemistry Earth Sciences and Geography Engineering and Technology Environmental Science History of Science Life Sciences Mathematics and Computer Science Physics Psychology Social sciences Anthropology Business and Management Economics Education Environment Human Geography Politics
StatisticsGraphsExamining Relationships Among VariablesCrosstabulationsMeasures of Association and CorrelationChi-Square Test of IndependenceExamining Differences Between GroupsANOVAT- tests Search for: Measures of Association and Correlation Note: if you click on an image, it will enlarge. Hit your back button to return to the page Proportionate Reduction of Error (PRE) is the logical foundation of determining measures of association. For example, suppose that you were told that there were a 100 people in a room and each person would leave individually. You are asked to guess whether the person is Jewish. How would you make your decision? Logically, you would think about the proportion of Jews to the population of people in the community. If you know that Jews are a minority subgroup in the community, what would make the best guess for each and every person leaving that room? You would probably choose “not Jewish”. You will have some errors, but most of the time you would be correct. Now, is there additional information that would help you improve your prediction? What would happen if you knew that the room was in the temple? Would you change your prediction? If this information improves your predictions (and correspondingly reduces your mistakes, or “proportionately reduces your error”), that is information that you want to know. This is the logic behind the measurements of association. How do you measure association? Lambda is a measure of association for nominal variables. Lambda ranges from 0.00 to 1.00. A lambda of 0.00 reflects no association between variables (perhaps you wondered if there is a relationship between a respondent having a dog as a child and his/her grade point average). A Lambda of 1.00 is a perfect association (perhaps you questioned the relationship between gender and pregnancy). Lambda does not give you a direction of assoc