error resilience meaning
I have a feeling as if this could be a kind of "crash protection" against faulty streams by adding several checks if the decoded data violates some assertions which might lead to stack/heap define error resilience overflows when not checked, but will cost CPU time when used, even on compliant video
Error Resilience Wikipediastreams. Due to a lack of documentation in the decoders or players (e.g. ffdshow, MPC-HC) I am not certain which option in the error resilience and concealment in video coding range between "careful" and "very aggressive" is the "safer but slower" or the "faster but unsafe", though... Reimar11th September 2010, 11:23"error resilience" is the old name of what is now called "error recognition" in FFmpeg: http://ffmpeg.org/doxygen/trunk/structAVCodecContext.html#cdc1b1330ab250216fee124b95c03a9b And
Error Resilient Wikiit decides how the decoder behaves if some value in the input is against the specification: whether it assumes it is a minor encoder mistake and "extends" the standard to give a meaning to that input or whether it assumes the input is corrupted and it should apply error concealment, i.e. assuming this and surrounding data have no relation with what the video really should look like and thus will try to reconstruct something reasonable-looking e.g. resilience meaning in telugu from the previous frame. This is not a speed related option (while error concealment is very slow that is not relevant, if it is used when it shouldn't be or the other way round the result will look very horrible). LigH11th September 2010, 11:36The more interesting part might me the treatment of corrupt entropy code or sanity checks between header related frame dimensions and decoding results of corrupt data. Let's imagine a decoder reserves memory to decode width*height pixels (or the macroblock data first which they are based on). But the entropy encoded data decodes to virtually much more decompressed data than reserved according to the header dimensions, due to data corruption in a way that the wrong data looks like many more small-compressed (e.g. Huffman) codes. The decoder tries to address more memory than it was allocated. The decoder crashes. And the player with it. Does the "error resilience" option of the decoder protect you from such issues? And if yes - which value do I have to set to be best protected, "careful" or "very aggressive"? LigH16th April 2011, 18:10This question is still not answered satisfyingly. Are there no decoder developers available who know what they coded? LigH15th November 2011, 14:42I am still curious if "error resilience" is in any way related to crash protection. vBulletin v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
A signal is a message sent from a transmitter to a receiver in multiple small packets.
Resilience Meaning In SpanishPacket loss occurs when these packets are misdirected, delayed, resequenced,
Resilience Meaning In Englishor corrupted. Contents 1 Receiver-Based Techniques 1.1 Waveform substitution 1.2 Zero Insertion 1.3 Interpolation 1.4 resilience meaning in hindi Buffer 2 Transmitter-Based Techniques 2.1 Retransmission 2.2 Packet Repetition 2.3 Interleaving 3 Applications 3.1 Analog Applications 3.2 Digital Applications 4 See also 5 References Receiver-Based http://forum.doom9.org/archive/index.php/t-156693.html Techniques When error recovery occurs at the receiving end of the signal, it is receiver-based. These techniques focus on correcting corrupted or missing data. Waveform substitution Preliminary attempts at receiver-based error concealment involved packet repetition, replacing lost packets with copies of previously received packets. This function is computationally simple and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_concealment is performed by a device on the receiver end called a "drop-out compensator". Zero Insertion When this technique is used, if a packet is lost, its entries are replaced with 0s. Interpolation Interpolation involves making educated guesses about the nature of a missing packet. For example, by following speech patterns in audio or faces in video. Buffer Data buffers are used for temporarily storing data while waiting for delayed packets to arrive. They are common in internet browser loading bars and video applications, like YouTube. Transmitter-Based Techniques Rather than attempting to recover lost packets, other techniques involve anticipating data loss, manipulating the data prior to transmission. Retransmission The simplest transmitter-based technique is retransmission, sending the message multiple times. Although this idea is simple, because of the extra time required to send multiple signals, this technique is incapable of supporting real-time applications. Packet Repetition Packet repetition, also called forwa
and Indexing · Aims and Scope · Article Processing Charges · Articles in Press · Author Guidelines · Bibliographic Information · Citations to this Journal · Contact Information · Editorial Board https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijdmb/2009/681078/ · Editorial Workflow · Free eTOC Alerts · Publication Ethics · Reviewers Acknowledgment · Submit a Manuscript · Subscription Information · Table of Contents Open Special Issues · Published Special Issues · Special Issue Guidelines Abstract Full-Text PDF Full-Text HTML Full-Text XML Linked References Citations to this Article How to Cite this Article Complete Special Issue International Journal of Digital Multimedia BroadcastingVolume 2009 (2009), Article ID 681078, 10 resilience meaning pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/681078Research ArticleAdaptive Error Resilience for Video StreamingLakshmi R. Siruvuri, Paul Salama, and Dongsoo S. KimDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, 723 West Michigan Street, SL160, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USAReceived 1 July 2008; Revised 29 January 2009; Accepted 24 March 2009Academic Editor: Lorenzo Ciccarelli Copyright © 2009 Lakshmi R. Siruvuri et al. This is an open access resilience meaning in article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.AbstractCompressed video sequences are vulnerable to channel errors, to the extent that minor errors and/or small losses can result in substantial degradation. Thus, protecting compressed data against channel errors is imperative. The use of channel coding schemes can be effective in reducing the impact of channel errors, although this requires that extra parity bits to be transmitted, thus utilizing more bandwidth. However, this can be ameliorated if the transmitter can tailor the parity data rate based on its knowledge regarding current channel conditions. This can be achieved via feedback from the receiver to the transmitter. This paper describes a channel emulation system comprised of a server/proxy/client combination that utilizes feedback from the client to adapt the number of Reed-Solomon parity symbols used to protect compressed video sequences against channel errors.1. IntroductionWith the advances in technology, applications such as video telephony, video conferencing, video-on-demand, video broadcasting, and video email have become a reality. In fact, during the last thirty years, there has been a tremendous advance in the v