Jury Error
Contents |
()() New Study Shows How Often Juries Get It WrongJune 26, 2007 | by Pat Vaughan TremmelEVANSTON, Ill. --- Juries across the country make decisions every day on the fate of defendants, ideally reversible error law definition leading to prison sentences that fit the crime for the guilty and
Types Of Reversible Error
release for the innocent. Yet a new Northwestern University study shows that juries in criminal cases many error of law examples times are getting it wrong. In a set of 271 cases from four areas, juries gave wrong verdicts in at least one out of eight cases, according to "Estimating
Examples Of Reversible Error In A Criminal Case
the Accuracy of Jury Verdicts," a paper by a Northwestern University statistician that is being published in the July issue of Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. "Contrary to popular belief, this study strongly suggests that DNA or other after-the-fact evidence is not the only way to know how often jury verdicts are correct," said Bruce Spencer, the study's harmful error author, professor of statistics and faculty fellow at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern. "Based on findings from a limited sample, I am optimistic that larger, carefully designed statistical studies would have much to tell us about the accuracy of jury verdicts." Spencer cautions that the numerical findings should not be generalized to broader sets of cases, for which additional study would be needed, but the study strongly suggests that jury verdicts can be studied statistically. If such studies were conducted on a large scale, they might lead to better understanding of the prevalence of incorrect verdicts -- false convictions and false acquittals, he said. To conduct the study, Spencer employed a replication analysis of jury verdicts, comparing decisions of actual jurors with decisions of judges who were hearing the cases they were deciding. In other words, as a jury was deliberating about a particular verdict, its judge filled out a questionnaire giving what he or she believed to be the correct verdict. "Consider the analogy to sample surveys, where sampling
Juries? Your peers are far from infallible. By Brian Palmer Prosecutors Hank Goldberg, left, and Marcia Clark stand next to the empty
Reversible Error Standard Of Review
jury box on Sept. 29, 1995, as they listen to Judge Lance Ito
Harmless Error
warn Clark that she is walking a fine line in her rebuttal closing arguments in the O.J. Simpson murder trial when a case is remanded in Los Angeles. Photo by Eric Draper/AFP/Getty Images Jurors in the George Zimmerman trial have dominated this week’s news. Juror B37 appeared on CNN with Anderson Cooper, prompting four of the five http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2007/06/juries.html others to distance themselves from the outspoken juror. The jury sequestration cost Floridians $33,000, which included pedicures, bowling, and admission to the Ripley’s Believe It Or Not! museum. Juries seem like a lot of trouble. How accurate are they? Ninety percent accurate, at best. Studies suggest that juries reach the correct verdict between 75 and 90 percent of the time. It’s impossible to ascertain http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2013/07/zimmerman_trial_how_accurate_are_juries.html whether juries are accurate in individual cases, of course. (If we knew all the facts, we wouldn’t need a jury.) Some legal scholars also insist that the idea of jury error is nonsensical, because guilt or innocence can’t exist independently of a jury verdict. These quasi-metaphysical concerns notwithstanding, the relatively narrow range of estimates that has resulted from decades of research lends some plausibility to the numbers. The first major study on this question was published in 1966, when University of Chicago law professors Harry Kalven Jr. and Hans Zeisel asked presiding judges to make a note of their own verdicts before the jury ruled. The judge and the jury agreed in approximately 80 percent of criminal cases. A similar study in 2003 found agreement in 77 percent of cases. Although they disagreed with the jury around 20 percent of the time, the judges found the verdict unreasonable in only 9 percent of cases. Advertisement Agreement isn’t a guarantee of correctness, of course. The judge and jury could each be wrong more than half of the time, even with a 77 percent agreement rate. To try to reach a better estimate o
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Federal Rules of Evidence Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure U.C.C. Law by jurisdiction State law Uniform laws Federal https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_51 law World law Lawyer directory Legal encyclopedia Business law Constitutional law Criminal law Family law http://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/appeals.html Employment law Money and Finances More... Help out Give Sponsor Advertise Create Promote Join Lawyer Directory Federal Rules of Civil Procedure › TITLE VI. TRIALS Rule 51. Instructions to the Jury; Objections; Preserving a Claim of Error (a) Requests. (1) Before or at the Close of the Evidence. At the close of the evidence or at any earlier reversible error reasonable time that the court orders, a party may file and furnish to every other party written requests for the jury instructions it wants the court to give. (2) After the Close of the Evidence. After the close of the evidence, a party may: (A) file requests for instructions on issues that could not reasonably have been anticipated by an earlier time that the court set for requests; and (B) with the of reversible error court's permission, file untimely requests for instructions on any issue. (b) Instructions. The court: (1) must inform the parties of its proposed instructions and proposed action on the requests before instructing the jury and before final jury arguments; (2) must give the parties an opportunity to object on the record and out of the jury's hearing before the instructions and arguments are delivered; and (3) may instruct the jury at any time before the jury is discharged. (c) Objections. (1) How to Make. A party who objects to an instruction or the failure to give an instruction must do so on the record, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds for the objection. (2) When to Make. An objection is timely if: (A) a party objects at the opportunity provided under Rule 51(b)(2); or (B) a party was not informed of an instruction or action on a request before that opportunity to object, and the party objects promptly after learning that the instruction or request will be, or has been, given or refused. (d) Assigning Error; Plain Error. (1) Assigning Error. A party may assign as error: (A) an error in an instruction actually given, if that party properly objected; or (B) a failure to give an instruction, if that party properly requested it
ABA Member Discounts and Offers FAQ ABA Groups ABA Leadership Centers & Commissions Committees Departments & Offices Divisions Forums Sections View All Groups Diversity Diversity & Inclusion 360 Commission Diversity & Inclusion Portal Advocacy ABA Policy Governmental & Legislative Work Amicus Curiae Briefs Diversity Initiatives Rule of Law Initiative Commission on Hispanic Legal Rights & Responsibilities Other ABA Initiatives Resources for Lawyers Legal Career Central Ethics & Professionalism Model Rules of Professional Conduct Books & Related Products Solo & Small Firm Resource Center Legal Profession Statistics ABA Blueprint 10 Questions LIVE Cyber Alerts Publishing Books Ankerwycke Publications Periodicals ABA Journal Discount Pricing for Libraries Book Discounts for Bars CLE CLE Courses by Topic Webinars In-Person Events On-Demand CLE Mandatory CLE CLE FAQs Free CLE ABA Essentials Minding Your Business ABA Value Pass Insurance News Media Credentials Contact Media Relations Reporter Alerts Media Credentials Top Stories News Releases Multimedia About Us ABA Mission and Goals ABA History and Timeline Careers ABA Departments ABA Governance and Policies Requests for Proposal Financial Reports Affiliated Organizations ABA Charities Donate Contact the ABA ABA Online ABA Business Conduct Standards Home>ABA Groups>Division for Public Education>Resources>Law-Related Education Network>How Courts Work>How Courts Work ABA Groups ABA Groups Division for Public Education Resources Law-Related Education Network How Courts Work How Courts Work Courts & Legal Procedure Steps in a Trial Being a Judge Mediation How Courts Work How Courts Work Steps in a TrialAppealsA popular misconception is that cases are always appealed. Not often does a losing party have an automatic right of appeal. There usually must be a legal basis for the appeal—an alleged material error in the trial—not just the fact that the losing party didn’t like the verdict.In a civil case, either party may appeal to a higher court. In a criminal case, only the defendant has a right to an appeal in most sta