How To Interpret Root Mean Square Error
Contents |
Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers normalized rmse or posting ads with us Cross Validated Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Cross
Interpretation Of Rmse In Regression
Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it rmse vs r2 only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Conceptual understanding of root mean squared error and mean bias deviation
Root Mean Square Error Excel
up vote 7 down vote favorite 6 I would like to gain a conceptual understanding of Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Bias Deviation (MBD). Having calculated these measures for my own comparisons of data, I've often been perplexed to find that the RMSE is high (for example, 100 kg), whereas the MBD is low (for example, less than 1%). More specifically, I am looking for a reference (not online) that lists and discusses the mathematics of these measures. What rmse units is the normally accepted way to calculate these two measures, and how should I report them in a journal article paper? It would be really helpful in the context of this post to have a "toy" dataset that can be used to describe the calculation of these two measures. For example, suppose that I am to find the mass (in kg) of 200 widgets produced by an assembly line. I also have a mathematical model that will attempt to predict the mass of these widgets. The model doesn't have to be empirical, and it can be physically-based. I compute the RMSE and the MBD between the actual measurements and the model, finding that the RMSE is 100 kg and the MBD is 1%. What does this mean conceptually, and how would I interpret this result? Now suppose that I find from the outcome of this experiment that the RMSE is 10 kg, and the MBD is 80%. What does this mean, and what can I say about this experiment? What is the meaning of these measures, and what do the two of them (taken together) imply? What additional information does the MBD give when considered with the RMSE? standard-deviation bias share|improve this question edited May 30 '12 at 2:05 asked May 29 '12 at 4:15 Nicholas Kinar 170116 1 Have you looked around our site, Nicholas? Consider starting at stats.stackexchange.com/a/17545 and then explore some of the tags I have adde
Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with
Relative Root Mean Square Error
us Cross Validated Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Cross Validated is a question and
Convert Rmse To R2
answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up root mean square error matlab Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top What are good RMSE values? up vote 20 down vote favorite 6 Suppose I have some dataset. I perform http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/29356/conceptual-understanding-of-root-mean-squared-error-and-mean-bias-deviation some regression on it. I have a separate test dataset. I test the regression on this set. Find the RMSE on the test data. How should I conclude that my learning algorithm has done well, I mean what properties of the data I should look at to conclude that the RMSE I have got is good for the data? regression error share|improve this question asked Apr 16 '13 at 21:03 Shishir Pandey 133128 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 16 http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/56302/what-are-good-rmse-values down vote I think you have two different types of questions there. One thing is what you ask in the title: "What are good RMSE values?" and another thing is how to compare models with different datasets using RMSE. For the first, i.e., the question in the title, it is important to recall that RMSE has the same unit as the dependent variable (DV). It means that there is no absolute good or bad threshold, however you can define it based on your DV. For a datum which ranges from 0 to 1000, an RMSE of 0.7 is small, but if the range goes from 0 to 1, it is not that small anymore. However, although the smaller the RMSE, the better, you can make theoretical claims on levels of the RMSE by knowing what is expected from your DV in your field of research. Keep in mind that you can always normalize the RMSE. For the second question, i.e., about comparing two models with different datasets by using RMSE, you may do that provided that the DV is the same in both models. Here, the smaller the better but remember that small differences between those RMSE may not be relevant or even significant. share|improve this answer edited Apr 26 at 3:34 Community♦ 1 answered Apr 17 '13 at 2:01 R.Astur 402210 What do you mean that you can always normalize RMSE? I see your point about DV range and RMSE. But can we quantify in terms of standard deviation
LibraryWhat are Mean Squared Error and Root Mean Squared Error? Tech Info LibraryWhat are Mean Squared Error and Root Mean SquaredError?About this FAQCreated Oct 15, 2001Updated Oct 18, 2011Article #1014Search FAQsProduct Support FAQsThe Mean https://www.vernier.com/til/1014/ Squared Error (MSE) is a measure of how close a fitted line is to data points. For every data point, you take the distance vertically from the point to the corresponding y value on the curve fit (the error), and square the value. Then you add up all those values for all data points, and divide by the number of points minus two.** root mean The squaring is done so negative values do not cancel positive values. The smaller the Mean Squared Error, the closer the fit is to the data. The MSE has the units squared of whatever is plotted on the vertical axis. Another quantity that we calculate is the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). It is just the square root of the mean square error. That root mean square is probably the most easily interpreted statistic, since it has the same units as the quantity plotted on the vertical axis. Key point: The RMSE is thus the distance, on average, of a data point from the fitted line, measured along a vertical line. The RMSE is directly interpretable in terms of measurement units, and so is a better measure of goodness of fit than a correlation coefficient. One can compare the RMSE to observed variation in measurements of a typical point. The two should be similar for a reasonable fit. **using the number of points - 2 rather than just the number of points is required to account for the fact that the mean is determined from the data rather than an outside reference. This is a subtlety, but for many experiments, n is large aso that the difference is negligible. Related TILs: TIL 1869: How do we calculate linear fits in Logger Pro? Need more assistance?Fill out our online support form or call us toll-free at 1-888-837-6437. Vernier Software & Technology Caliper Logo Vernier Software & Technology 13979 SW Millikan Way Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone1-888-837-6437 Fax503-277-2440 Emailinfo@ve