Db2 Sql Error 40001
Contents |
deadlock; hang; PersistentLockManager; SQLCODE: -911 Technote (troubleshooting) Problem(Abstract)
Sql Error 1205 Sqlstate 40001
DB2 database deadlocks and SQLCODE -911 occur in the PersistentLockManager calls. Symptom The following exception sql error 1213 sqlstate 40001 is written in the profileRoot/profileName/logs/serverName/SystemOut.log file: PersistentLoc E com.ibm.wbiserver.sequencing.lkmgr.PersistentLockManagerBean unlockAndGrantNext Error in unlock and grant next com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.SqlException: DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -911, SQLSTATE: 40001, SQLERRMC: 2 at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.yg.b(yg.java:3046) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.c.eb.h(eb.java:268) db2 sqlstate 40001 reason code 2 at com.ibm.db2.jcc.c.eb.a(eb.java:229) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.c.eb.c(eb.java:33) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.c.u.a(u.java:34) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.c.j.Ib(j.java:257) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.yg.Q(yg.java:2896) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.c.d.g(d.java:1444) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.eb.a(eb.java:191) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.yg.c(yg.java:274) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.yg.next(yg.java:238) at com.ibm.ws.rsadapter.jdbc.WSJdbcResultSet.next(WSJdbcResultSet.java:2468) at com.ibm.wbiserver.sequencing.lkmgr.PersistentLockManagerBean .unlockAndGrantNext(PersistentLockManagerBean.java:299) at com.ibm.wbiserver.sequencing.lkmgr.PersistentLockManagerBean .unlock(PersistentLockManagerBean.java:225) at com.ibm.wbiserver.sequencing.lkmgr.EJSLocalStatelessPersistent LockManager_19c5d0a6.unlock(Unknown Source) at com.ibm.wbiserver.sequencing.wcc.UnlockUtil.unlockOnly(UnlockUtil.java:103) at com.ibm.wbiserver.sequencing.wcc.UnlockUtil.unlock(UnlockUtil.java:75) The error indicates that a deadlock occurred in the DB2 database server. Following is the deadlock data that is captured from the DB2 database. This data comes from the formatted output of the DB2DETAILDEADLOCK event monitor, which is created and active by default for every DB2 database: Deadlock ID: 889 (Deadlock detection time: 10/22/2009 11:07:26.
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site
Db2 Sql Error Sqlcode=-911 Sqlstate=40001
About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about db2 sql error sqlcode=-911 sqlstate=40001 sqlerrmc=68 hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join
Db2 Sql Error Sqlcode=-911 Sqlstate=40001 Sqlerrmc=2
the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up DB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-911, SQLSTATE=40001, http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21410155 SQLERRMC=68 up vote 0 down vote favorite I am getting this error when I ran: alter table tablename add column columnname varchar(1) default 'N'; DB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-911, SQLSTATE=40001, SQLERRMC=68 How to solve it? db2 share|improve this question edited Nov 7 '13 at 15:21 Benjamin 11.4k1692171 asked Sep 17 '12 at 16:31 Naga 1442311 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12463493/db2-sql-error-sqlcode-911-sqlstate-40001-sqlerrmc-68 1 down vote The alter statement wants to get an X lock on this row in SYSIBM.SYSTABLES. There is an open transaction that has this row/index value in an incompatible lock state. This lock that caused the timeout could even be from an open cursor that reads this row with an RS or RR isolation level. Terminate any other SQL currently trying to query SYSTABLES and any utilities that may be trying to update SYSTABLES like reorg and runstats then try the alter again. share|improve this answer answered Apr 23 '15 at 13:55 Bill Peck 362 Run "db2 get snapshot for locks on
be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start http://www.dbforums.com/showthread.php?1629947-DB2-SQL-Error-SQLSTATE-40001-SQLERRMC-68 viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Results 1 to 2 of 2 Thread: DB2 SQL Error: SQLSTATE: 40001, SQLERRMC: 68 Tweet Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Search Thread Advanced Search Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode 05-01-08,18:15 #1 Priya M View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date May 2008 sql error Posts 1 Unanswered: DB2 SQL Error: SQLSTATE: 40001, SQLERRMC: 68 Hi, I am getting the following exception when there are multiple instances of EJB that try to update the same row in the database. I have a sequence number stored in a properties table and two nodes in a cluster have EJBs running that want to increment this sequence number. The exception is occuring when the code does db2 sql error a save on the hiberate DAO object, to update the row. Could someone please tell me what do I need to do to avoid this error? I would really appreciate your help. Caused by: com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.SqlException: DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -911, SQLSTATE: 40001, SQLERRMC: 68 at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.rc.b(rc.java:3180) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.a.eb.i(eb.java:227) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.a.eb.a(eb.java:183) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.a.eb.a(eb.java:34) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.a.s.a(s.java:30) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.a.h.Gb(h.java:325) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.rc.R(rc.java:3022) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.a.d.f(d.java:1070) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.r.a(r.java:191) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.rc.c(rc.java:302) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.b.rc.next(rc.java:277) at com.ibm.ws.rsadapter.jdbc.WSJdbcResultSet.next(WSJ dbcResultSet.java:2419) at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQuery(Loader.java:68 5) at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQueryAndInitializeNo nLazyCollections(Loader.java:224) at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doList(Loader.java:221 1) ... 29 more Thanks, Priya Reply With Quote 05-01-08,21:24 #2 Marcus_A View Profile View Forum Posts Registered User Join Date May 2003 Location USA Posts 5,737 You are getting a locktimeout. That means that one of the applications is holding a lock on a resource (probably a row) and another application is trying to acquire an incompatible lock on the same resource. The amount of time the second application waits depends on the setting of locktimeout (in seconds) in the db config. Most people have it set to about 30 seconds (the default is -1 which means wait forever). Most likely the first application is not committing after the update (insert, update or delete). A commit will release the lock. M. A. Feldman IBM Certified DBA