Error 10049 Sql Server
Contents |
Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Server socket error 10049 Fault Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Server Fault is a question and answer site for error 10049 origin system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The
Windows Could Not Start The Sql Server On Local Computer Error Code 3417
best answers are voted up and rise to the top SQL Server 2008 R2 doesn't start automatically on Windows 2008 R2 Web up vote 2 down vote favorite I've got a SQL Server 2008 R2 Express running on a Windows Server 2008 R2
Windows Could Not Start The Sql Server (mssqlserver) Service On Local Computer
Web edition. Evertything works great except that the SQL service doesn't start automaticaly on server boot. The SQL Service, the agent and the server browser are set on automatic. The server is a clean install with an IIS and the sql server only. Once the server is started, I can start the service manually and it works just fine. The only error I have in the log is "The SQL Server (SQLEXPRESS) service terminated with service-specific error The requested address is not valid in its context." In details, sql server mssqlserver service not starting there is a param2 : %%10049. Any help would be greatly appreciated since it is a production server. Each time it restarts, the website is down until I manually start the SQL service. windows-server-2008 sql-server-2008 service share|improve this question asked Feb 19 '12 at 20:19 Benoît 1314 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote accepted Is that error from the Windows Event log or the SQL Server Log? (It sounds like an Windows service error, not the sort of detailed error that would be reported by SQL and kept in it's error log.) The windows Event log is visible through the Event Viewer and the SQL Server log can be seen through SSMS. It is pretty rare to not have decent error messages in one log or the other. If you haven't already, have a look in the SQL Server error log (including the older ones when the service fails) and see what looks different between a failed start and a successful start. WAG: Is there something that prevents exclusive access to the file? Something like a virus scanner that scans on boot, or a SAN connection that takes a while to come online? share|improve this answer answered Feb 19 '12 at 22:26 darin strait 1,87296 1 I found a message in the sql log. It might be related to a VPN setup. After a quick look, it seems SQL is trying to listen on an IP that only exist once the VPN is opened. Because, I use the VPN to con
up Recent PostsRecent Posts Popular TopicsPopular Topics Home Search Members Calendar Who's On Home » SQL
Windows Could Not Start The Sql Server Agent Service On Local Computer Error 1068
Server 2008 » SQL Server Newbies » Database won't start error 10049 windows could not start the sql server (mssqlserver) service on local computer error 1067 after vmware... Database won't start error 10049 after vmware converter 5.0 Rate Topic Display Mode Topic Options Author Message windows could not start the sql server (mssqlserver) service on local computer error 1069 ken.schilstraken.schilstra Posted Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:22 PM Forum Newbie Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:14 AM Points: 5, Visits: 10 I converted a physical server http://serverfault.com/questions/361669/sql-server-2008-r2-doesnt-start-automatically-on-windows-2008-r2-web to a virtual server using vmware converter 5. MS Server is 2008 R2 as is the sql server. One database won't start. Other ones are functional. I noticed that there now are 2 entries in the studio pull down list for the same database and neither work. Any ideas would be appreciated.thanksKen Post #1331896 Mike JohnMike John Posted Wednesday, July 18, 2012 http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1331896-1292-1.aspx 11:34 PM SSCrazy Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Monday, August 15, 2016 6:50 AM Points: 2,670, Visits: 5,953 I suspect the non-functional db was in use at some point during the P2V and is marked as unavailable. Error messages from the sql server log file should give you details.If that isthe case, either redo the P2V, having ensured SQl server is sut down first, or take a database backup from the old real server and restore to the new virtual one.Mike Post #1331916 Perry WhittlePerry Whittle Posted Thursday, July 19, 2012 2:49 AM SSCrazy Eights Group: General Forum Members Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:08 AM Points: 8,245, Visits: 16,394 Mike is correct here, the P2V operation is on a per drive basis and if a database is in use the time period netween the transafer of the data and log files can stop the database from starting on the clone VM. Best thing is to take a backup of the database from the physical tin box and restore it to the VM. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eg
360 games PC games https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/307288 Windows games Windows phone games Entertainment All Entertainment https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/c4c016ac-10de-4be8-8857-311e737f9b78/service-failed-to-start-listening-error-10049-binding?forum=exchange2010 Movies & TV Music Business & Education Business Students & educators Developers Sale Sale Find a store Gift cards Products Software & services Windows Office Free downloads & security Internet sql server Explorer Microsoft Edge Skype OneNote OneDrive Microsoft Health MSN Bing Microsoft Groove Microsoft Movies & TV Devices & Xbox All Microsoft devices Microsoft Surface All Windows PCs & tablets PC accessories Xbox & games Microsoft Lumia All windows could not Windows phones Microsoft HoloLens For business Cloud Platform Microsoft Azure Microsoft Dynamics Windows for business Office for business Skype for business Surface for business Enterprise solutions Small business solutions Find a solutions provider Volume Licensing For developers & IT pros Develop Windows apps Microsoft Azure MSDN TechNet Visual Studio For students & educators Office for students OneNote in classroom Shop PCs & tablets perfect for students Microsoft in Education Support Sign in Cart Cart Javascript is disabled Please enable javascript and refresh the page Cookies are disabled Please enable cookies and refresh the page CV: {{ getCv() }} English (United States) Terms of use Privacy & cookies Trademarks © 2016 Microsoft
(עברית)المملكة العربية السعودية (العربية)ไทย (ไทย)대한민국 (한국어)中华人民共和国 (中文)台灣 (中文)日本 (日本語) HomeOnline20132010Other VersionsLibraryForumsGalleryEHLO Blog Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Answered by: Service Failed to start listening (Error: 10049). Binding Previous Versions of Exchange > Exchange Server 2010 Question 0 Sign in to vote We're having an issue trying to add a few internal servers to our POP3 and IMAP IP list on each of our 4 CAS servers. The POP3 service will not start if I add an IP address. If I remove the single IP and add "ALL" IP addresses it works. We only want to allow a handfull and not all. Event Logs Failed to open one or more bindings. The service will be stopped. Failed to start listening (Error: 10049). Binding: 10.22.2.111:110. I reviewed this technet article, however the IP address that won't bind from above is not listed in the receive connectors as the technet article states to remove the IP that it can't bind to. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd789669%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx Any ideas? Thanks d Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:36 PM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote Hi dfunk12, The parameter UnencryptedOrTLSBindings(or Binding Tab) is for local IP address. If you set the value to the local Exchange server IP, you willfind it works.Sames as Bindings of Default Web Site. But you want to restrict the remote IP address: "Now we don't want to enable all IP's in the company to be able to use POP3 only a select number of IP addresses." About your query, I think you can create a Firewall rule to restrict the connection. And workaround: You can disable other account's POP feature using Set-CasMailbox with parameter PopEnabled:$false .Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Proposed as answer by emma.yoyo Wednesday, February 02, 2011 1:40 AM Marked as answer by emma.yoyo Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:42 AM Tuesday, February 01, 2011 7:27 AM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote I really don't understand what you're trying to do. Would you please explain in more detail?Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological