@@error In Sql Server 2000 Stored Procedure
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about sql server 2000 stored procedure tutorial Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads sql server 2000 stored procedure parameters with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow
Sql Server 2000 Stored Procedures Can
is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Exception handling in SQL Server 2000 up vote 0 down vote favorite I
Find Text In Stored Procedure Sql Server 2000
have a procedure that gets data from a table and inserts it into a temporary table. Then the procedure validates one by one in a while loop. For example: I have 50 rows and the first row fails. In that case, I wish that the procedure continues processing the remaining 49 rows. I'm forcing an error in an insert statement and and I put under it @@error <> 0 but sql server stored procedure error handling does not enter if block. But procedure ends and doesn't continues with the next statement to be executed. I am running the procedure from Query Analyzer and put message with print 'line 1' etc etc. Thank you for your help. This is a similar example create procedure procx as declare @ind_max int, @ind int, @var_id int, @var_name varchar(3) declare @table_x table ( row_id int identity(1,1), id_x int, name_x varchar(25), status_x int ) insert into @table_x values(1, 'xxx', 0) insert into @table_x values(2, 'yyy', 0) insert into @table_x values(3, 'zzz', 0) set @ind_max = 3 set @ind = 1 while (@ind <= @ind_max) begin print 'line 1' select @var_id = id_x , @var_name = name_x from @table_x where row_id = @ind -- Forced error id_x is int field -- Doesn't show line2, line3 ... -- Msg 245, Level 16, State 1, Procedure procx, Line 160 -- Syntax error converting the varchar value 'A' to a column of data type int. insert into test ( id_x , name_x ) values ( 'A' , @var_name ) if @@error != 0 begin print 'line 2' goto next_row insert into log_test values(@var_id, 'Error') end print 'line 3' update @table_x set status_x = 1 where row_id = @ind print 'line 4' next_row:
Slave Agents on Windows Getting Windows Git Bash to Hitch Recent CommentsHow to config Xcode with Github on Mac OS | EVIANZZ on 12 steps to using GitHub with
Sql Server 2005 Stored Procedure Error Handling
XCode 4Jonathan on Shutting down log4net repositoriesJonathan on NaNT .build file Intellisensevinoth Kumar sql server stored procedure error handling best practices on NaNT .build file IntellisenseGilberto Williamson on Are your contacts portable?Archives November 2015 April 2014 November 2013 February 2012 January error handling in stored procedure sql server 2008 2012 July 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 April 2010 February 2010 September 2009 July 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19551176/exception-handling-in-sql-server-2000 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 Categories Agile Comment Community Esendex Hardware iPhone Linux Nottingham Open Standards Portable Contacts TechEd XCode Meta Log in Entries RSS Comments RSS WordPress.org Stored procedure error handling in SQL Server 2000 Today, we're continuing work on our multipart message http://mindthe.net/devices/2007/08/30/stored-procedure-error-handling-in-sql-server-2000/ aggregation upgrade for a future Esendex release. One part of the investigations this morning has been looking into how we manage the database access as we add parts of an incoming message to it for later processing. As we have multiple servers processing inbound messages, there was the potential for two threads trying to write to the database simultanously with different parts of the same message. Both could look at the database and think there were no existing parts of a multipart message, and decide to try and insert a new multipart message record. During this work we found out that SQL Server 2000 will still raise an SQLException error despite error handling put in T-SQL. A quick mockup test yesterday revealed that two competing threads could indeed try and insert twice despite checking for an existing record and caused a Unique Key error 2601. As this was all being coded in a stored procedure we looked to see what error handling T-SQL provided us. Whilst you can detect the error number after a T-SQL statement in a stored procedure by querying the global variable @@ERROR, you cannot prevent SQL Server 2000 from sending an exception error
some extent ADO - behave when an error occurs. The other article, Implementing Error Handling with Stored Procedures, gives advice for how you should check for errors when you write stored procedures. Logically, this article is part http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-I.html one, and Implementing... is part two. However, you can read the articles in any order, and if you are relatively new to SQL Server, I recommend that you start with Implementing.... The article here gives a deeper background and may answer more advanced users' questions about error handling in SQL Server. Note: this article was written for SQL2000 and earlier versions. All I have for SQL 2005 is unfinished article with a section Jumpstart Error Handling. The content in sql server this article is to some extent applicable to SQL 2005 as well, but you will have to use your imagination to map what I say to SQL 2005. The article includes a short section on TRY-CATCH. I hope to produce a complete article for error handling in SQL 2005 later on. Table of Contents: Introduction The Basics The Anatomy of an Error Message How to Detect an Error in T-SQL - @@error Return Values from Stored Procedures @@rowcount @@trancount sql server 2000 More on Severity Levels What Happens when an Error Occurs? The Possible Actions When Does SQL Server Take which Action? Connection-termination Scope-abortion Statement-termination and Batch-abortion Trigger Context Errors in User-Defined Functions Control Over Error Handling SET XACT_ABORT ARITHABORT, ARITHIGNORE and ANSI_WARNINGS RAISERROR WITH NOWAIT Duplicates Using Linked Servers Retrieving the Text of an Error Message TRY-CATCH in SQL2005 Client-side Error Handling DB-Library ODBC ADO ADO .Net Acknowledgements and Feedback Revision History Introduction In many aspects SQL Server is a very good DBMS that permits you implement powerful solutions with good performance. However, when it comes to error handling... To be blunt: error handling in SQL Server is poor. It is a patchwork of not-always-so-consistent behaviour. It's also weak in that you have fairly little control over error handling, and for advanced error handling like suppressing errors or logging errors, you must take help from the client-side. Unfortunately, depending on which client library you use, you may find that the client library has its own quirks, sometimes painting you into a corner where there is no real good solution. In this article, I will first look at what parts an error message consists of, and how you can detect that an error has occurred in T-SQL code. Next, I describe the possible actions can SQL Server can take in case of an error. I then proceed to describe the f