Average Standard Error Of Prediction
Contents |
the estimate from a scatter plot Compute the standard error of the estimate based on errors of prediction Compute the standard error using Pearson's correlation Estimate the standard error of the estimate standard error of prediction in r based on a sample Figure 1 shows two regression examples. You can
Standard Error Of Prediction Linear Regression
see that in Graph A, the points are closer to the line than they are in Graph B. Therefore, standard error of prediction excel the predictions in Graph A are more accurate than in Graph B. Figure 1. Regressions differing in accuracy of prediction. The standard error of the estimate is a measure of the accuracy
Standard Error Of Prediction Calculator
of predictions. Recall that the regression line is the line that minimizes the sum of squared deviations of prediction (also called the sum of squares error). The standard error of the estimate is closely related to this quantity and is defined below: where σest is the standard error of the estimate, Y is an actual score, Y' is a predicted score, and N is standard error of prediction multiple linear regression the number of pairs of scores. The numerator is the sum of squared differences between the actual scores and the predicted scores. Note the similarity of the formula for σest to the formula for σ.  It turns out that σest is the standard deviation of the errors of prediction (each Y - Y' is an error of prediction). Assume the data in Table 1 are the data from a population of five X, Y pairs. Table 1. Example data. X Y Y' Y-Y' (Y-Y')2 1.00 1.00 1.210 -0.210 0.044 2.00 2.00 1.635 0.365 0.133 3.00 1.30 2.060 -0.760 0.578 4.00 3.75 2.485 1.265 1.600 5.00 2.25 2.910 -0.660 0.436 Sum 15.00 10.30 10.30 0.000 2.791 The last column shows that the sum of the squared errors of prediction is 2.791. Therefore, the standard error of the estimate is There is a version of the formula for the standard error in terms of Pearson's correlation: where ρ is the population value of Pearson's correlation and SSY is For the data in Table 1, μy = 2.06, SSY = 4.597 and ρ= 0.6268. Therefore
The slope and Y intercept of the regression line are 3.2716 and 7.1526 respectively. The third column, (Y'), contains the predictions http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A134205.html and is computed according to the formula: Y' = 3.2716X + 7.1526. The fourth column (Y-Y') is the error of prediction. It is simply the difference between what a subject's actual score was (Y) and what the predicted score is (Y'). The sum of the errors of prediction is zero. The last column, (Y-Y')², contains the squared errors of prediction.
it comes to determining how well a linear model fits the data. However, I've stated previously that R-squared is overrated. Is there a different goodness-of-fit statistic that can be more helpful? You bet! Today, http://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics/regression-analysis-how-to-interpret-s-the-standard-error-of-the-regression I’ll highlight a sorely underappreciated regression statistic: S, or the standard error of the regression. S provides important information that R-squared does not. What is the Standard Error of the Regression (S)? S becomes smaller when the data points are closer to the line. In the regression output for Minitab statistical software, you can find S in the Summary of Model section, right next to R-squared. Both statistics provide an overall standard error measure of how well the model fits the data. S is known both as the standard error of the regression and as the standard error of the estimate. S represents the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line. Conveniently, it tells you how wrong the regression model is on average using the units of the response variable. Smaller values are better because it indicates that the observations standard error of are closer to the fitted line. The fitted line plot shown above is from my post where I use BMI to predict body fat percentage. S is 3.53399, which tells us that the average distance of the data points from the fitted line is about 3.5% body fat. Unlike R-squared, you can use the standard error of the regression to assess the precision of the predictions. Approximately 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 2*standard error of the regression from the regression line, which is also a quick approximation of a 95% prediction interval. For the BMI example, about 95% of the observations should fall within plus/minus 7% of the fitted line, which is a close match for the prediction interval. Why I Like the Standard Error of the Regression (S) In many cases, I prefer the standard error of the regression over R-squared. I love the practical, intuitiveness of using the natural units of the response variable. And, if I need precise predictions, I can quickly check S to assess the precision. Conversely, the unit-less R-squared doesn’t provide an intuitive feel for how close the predicted values are to the observed values. Further, as I detailed here, R-squared is relevant mainly when you need precise predictions. However, you can’t us
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sat, 01 Oct 2016 21:06:00 GMT by s_hv995 (squid/3.5.20)