Error Handling In Stored Procedures In Sql Server 2005
Contents |
resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards error handling in stored procedure sql server 2008 Events Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs and
Error Handling In Stored Procedure Sql Server 2012
reference Dev centers Retired content Samples We’re sorry. The content you requested has been removed. You’ll
Sql Server Stored Procedure Error Handling Best Practices
be auto redirected in 1 second. Microsoft SQL Server Language Reference Transact-SQL Reference (Database Engine) Control-of-Flow Language (Transact-SQL) Control-of-Flow Language (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL)
Exception Handling In Stored Procedure In Sql Server
TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) BEGIN...END (Transact-SQL) BREAK (Transact-SQL) CONTINUE (Transact-SQL) ELSE (IF...ELSE) (Transact-SQL) END (BEGIN...END) (Transact-SQL) GOTO (Transact-SQL) IF...ELSE (Transact-SQL) RETURN (Transact-SQL) THROW (Transact-SQL) TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) WAITFOR (Transact-SQL) WHILE (Transact-SQL) TOC Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. This documentation is mysql stored procedure error handling archived and is not being maintained. TRY...CATCH (Transact-SQL) Other Versions SQL Server 2012 THIS TOPIC APPLIES TO: SQL Server (starting with 2008)Azure SQL DatabaseAzure SQL Data Warehouse Parallel Data Warehouse Implements error handling for Transact-SQL that is similar to the exception handling in the Microsoft Visual C# and Microsoft Visual C++ languages. A group of Transact-SQL statements can be enclosed in a TRY block. If an error occurs in the TRY block, control is passed to another group of statements that is enclosed in a CATCH block. Transact-SQL Syntax ConventionsSyntax Copy -- Syntax for SQL Server, Azure SQL Database, Azure SQL Data Warehouse, Parallel Data Warehouse BEGIN TRY { sql_statement | statement_block } END TRY BEGIN CATCH [ { sql_statement | statement_block } ] END CATCH [ ; ] Argumentssql_statement Is any Transact-SQL statement.statement_block Any group of Transact-SQL statements in a batch or enclosed in a BEGIN…END block.RemarksA TRY…CATCH construct catches all execut
how you should implement error handling when you write stored procedures, including when you call them from ADO. The other article, Error Handling in SQL Server - a Background, gives a deeper description of the idiosyncrasies with error handling in SQL Server and oracle stored procedure error handling ADO. That article is in some sense part one in the series. However, you can read sql stored procedure try catch this article without reading the background article first, and if you are not a very experienced user of SQL Server, I recommend you to start error handling in sql server stored procedure here. In places there are links to the background article, if you want more information about a certain issue. Note: this article is aimed at SQL2000 and earlier versions of SQL Server. SQL2005 offers significantly improved methods for error handling https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175976.aspx with TRY-CATCH. This article is not apt if you are using SQL 2005 or later. I don't have a complete article on error handling for SQL 2005, but I have an unfinished article with a section Jumpstart Error Handling that still can be useful. Table of Contents: Introduction The Presumptions A General Example Checking Calls to Stored Procedures The Philosophy of Error Handling General Requirements Why Do We Check for Errors? When Should You Check @@error? ROLLBACK or not to ROLLBACK - http://www.sommarskog.se/error-handling-II.html That's the Question SET XACT_ABORT ON revisited Error Handling with Cursors Error Handling with Triggers Error Handling with User-Defined Functions Error Handling with Dynamic SQL Error Handling in Client Code What to Do in Case of an Error? Command Timeouts Why is My Error Not Raised? Getting the Return Value from a Stored Procedure Acknowledgements and Feedback Revision History Introduction Error handling in stored procedures is a very tedious task, because T-SQL offers no exception mechanism, or any On Error Goto. All you have is the global variable @@error which you need to check after each statement for a non-zero value to be perfectly safe. If you call a stored procedure, you also need to check the return value from the procedure. In fact, this is so extremely tedious, so you will find that you will have to make compromises and in some situations assume that nothing can go wrong. Still, you cannot just ignore checking for errors, because ignoring an error could cause your updates to be incomplete, and compromise the integrity of your data. Or it can cause a transaction to run for much longer time than intended, leading to blocking and risk that the user loses all his updates when he logs out. In the first section, I summarize the most important points of the material in the background article, so you know under which presumptions you have to work. Next, I show you a general example th
Tutorials MSDN Communities Hub Official Docs Security Stump the SQL Guru! XML Info Information: Feedback Author an Article Published: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/041906-1.shtml TRY...CATCH in SQL Server 2005An Easier Approach to Rolling Back Transactions https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1027/sql-server-2005-try-and-catch-exception-handling/ in the Face of an Error By Scott Mitchell Introduction SQL Server 2005 offers a number of new features over its predecessor, including many features aimed at making working with databases more like writing .NET application code. For example, in SQL Server 2005, stored procedures, stored procedure triggers, UDFs, and so on can be written using any .NET Framework programming language (such as Visual Basic or C#). Another feature, and the focus of this article, is SQL Server 2005's support for TRY...CATCH blocks. TRY...CATCH blocks are the standard approach to exception handling in modern programming languages, and involve: A TRY Block - the error handling in TRY block contains the instructions that might cause an exception A CATCH Block - if an exception occurs from one of the statements in the TRY block, control is branched to the CATCH block, where the exception can be handled, logged, and so on. See the Wikipedia Exception Handling entry for more information on the TRY...CATCH construct as well as exception handling concepts in general. Prior to SQL Server 2005, detecting errors resulting from T-SQL statements could only be handled by checking a global error variable, @@ERROR. Because the @@ERROR variable value is reset after each SQL statement, this antiquated approach leads to rather bloated stored procedures, as the variable must be checked after each statement with code to handle any problems. The TRY...CATCH block in SQL Server 2005 offers a much more readable syntax and one that developers are more familiar with. In this article we'll look at the new TRY...CATCH block and examine how it can be used to rollback a transaction in
1 | 2 | 3 | More > Error Handling Problem Error handling in previous versions of SQL Server was not the easiest thing to do. You could test the value of @@ERROR or check @@ROWCOUNT, but if the error was a fatal error you did not have a lot of options. Solution With SQL Server 2005, new error handling has been introduced with the TRY...CATCH processing. Basically what happens is when an error occurs the processing in the TRY block stops and processing is then picked up in the CATCH block. The following illustrates a simple example of how this is done: Step Code Output 1 CREATE PROCEDURE usp_ExampleProcAS SELECT * FROM NonexistentTable;GO Command(s) completed successfully. 2 EXECUTE usp_ExampleProc Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Procedure usp_ExampleProc, Line 3Invalid object name 'NonexistentTable'. (Note: Processing Stops) 3 BEGIN TRY EXECUTE usp_ExampleProcEND TRYBEGIN CATCH SELECT ERROR_NUMBER() as ErrorNumber, ERROR_MESSAGE() as ErrorMessage;END CATCH; 208 Invalid object name 'NonexistentTable'. (Note: Processing Continues) 4 BEGIN TRY EXECUTE usp_ExampleProcEND TRYBEGIN CATCHEND CATCH; Command(s) completed successfully. (Note: Processing Continues) As you can see from the above code and output that when we create the stored procedure for a non-existent table in Step 1 the procedure creates without a problem. If we run the stored procedure using the code in Step 2, we get an error message that the object does not exist. If we run the stored procedure using the code in Step 3, the error is sent to the CATCH block and an error message is returned. At this point processing can continue without a problem. To further illustrate this in Step 4 the stored procedure is run, the error is caught in the CATCH block, but we are not doing anything to process the error. Normally you would have something happen, but this shows that you don't have to have any code in the CATCH block. The values that can be retrieved from the error are also much more detailed, then what you could get with previous versions of SQL Server. Below is a list of the data that can be retrieved when an error occurs. ERROR_NUMBER() - returns the number of the error. ERROR_SEVERITY() - returns the severity. ERROR_STATE() - returns the error state number. ERROR_PROCEDURE() - returns the name of the stored procedure or trigger where the error occurred. ERROR_LINE() - returns the line number inside the routine that