Error /usr/src/linux Exists But Is Not A Symlink Exiting
Contents |
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 2 Star 3 Fork 1 tsuehpsyde/easygentoo Code Issues 0 Pull requests 0 Projects 0 Pulse Graphs Permalink Branch: master Switch branches/tags Branches Tags master Nothing
Ln Failed To Create Symbolic Link File Exists
to show Nothing to show Find file Copy path easygentoo/kernel-upgrade.sh Fetching contributors… Cannot retrieve failed to create symbolic link no such file or directory contributors at this time Raw Blame History executable file 502 lines (434 sloc) 14.6 KB #!/bin/bash # Script to update a manually
Ln Failed To Create Symbolic Link Operation Not Supported
compiled Linux kernel in Gentoo. # Re-written to support multiple arches, as well as Rackspace Cloud. # # This script is a bit specific to my needs, but I figured I could # GPL it ln creating symbolic link for anyone to use and modify to their needs. I try to cover # anyone building their own kernel manually via make menuconfig. # # Note that uname -r doesn't give us linux- in front of the kernel # version but /usr/src/* does. This causes some formatting/comparison # issues along the way which I remedy by moving stuff around as I go. # # Copyright (C) 2012 James Bair
communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About
Failed To Create Symbolic Link Permission Denied
Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers ln failed to create symbolic link read-only file system or posting ads with us Ask Ubuntu Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Ask Ubuntu is a question and
Ln Failed To Create Symbolic Link Protocol Error
answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up https://github.com/tsuehpsyde/easygentoo/blob/master/kernel-upgrade.sh and rise to the top What is a “failed to create a symbolic link: file exists” error? up vote 16 down vote favorite 6 I'm trying to create a symlink in my home directory to a directories and files on my data partition. I've tried: ~/Documents$ ln -sv ~/Documents/saga /media/mariajulia/485f3e29-355c-4be3-b80a-1f5abd5604b6/mariajulia/Downloads/saga..doc to create a symlink named saga in my Documents directory in my home folder. The terminal output is: http://askubuntu.com/questions/543516/what-is-a-failed-to-create-a-symbolic-link-file-exists-error ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘/media/mariajulia/485f3e29-355c-4be3-b80a-1f5abd5604b6/mariajulia/Downloads/saga..doc’: File exists I was checking the content of ~/Documents with ls -a , there is nothing but . and ... In general my home folder is empty, it's just a fresh system installation. symbolic-link share|improve this question edited Oct 30 '14 at 14:33 Jorge Castro 24.2k91386589 asked Oct 30 '14 at 9:37 maria 46321026 Thanks. It seems my question is not very useful. Should I delete it? Or you convert your comment in the reply so I could accept it as solved :) –maria Oct 30 '14 at 9:57 3 Your question has a score of four, so apparently the community decided that it is useful. Also, even if you tried you wouldn't be able to delete the question, since it has an answer with a score of 1 or more. –11684 Oct 30 '14 at 19:29 I got my answer to this question from here (on this forum): askubuntu.com/questions/379647/… –wayneeusa Jun 24 '15 at 7:57 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 16 down vote accepted This is a classical error... it's the other way around: ln -s Existing-file New-name so in your case ln -sv /media/mariajulia/485f3e29-355c-4be3-b80a-
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/313678/tlmgr-path-add-yields-errors-but-makes-symlinks of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us TeX - LaTeX Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's symbolic link how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top tlmgr path add yields errors but makes symlinks up vote 1 down vote favorite Today (June 9, 2016), I've just installed TeX Live 2016 on my Ubuntu 14.04.4. The installation itself was successful, but when I tried to make symlinks for binaries, info failed to create pages, and man pages, path subcommand from tlmgr failed (I mean, the exit status $? was 1 after the path add). Strangely, however, most of the symlinks were made in proper directories. Here is what I did in the terminal. $ cd /path/to/installer $ sudo ./install-tl $ which tex tex not found $ sudo /usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr path add tlmgr: action path returned an error; continuing. tlmgr: An error has occurred. See above messages. Exiting. $ which tex /usr/local/bin/tex $ for file in $(ls /usr/local/texlive/2016/bin/x86_64-linux/); do; which $file; done | grep "not found" xindy.mem not found I read the documentation about path, but I couldn't understand what was wrong with my procedure. The lack of xindy.mem in $PATH won't harm me because it's very unlikely for me to use xindy package, but what happened to my installation? Do I need to do something to fix this? Note (I'm not sure if this helps): Installing TeX Live 2015 on my El Capitan worked well in the exact same way a few months ago (the paths for tlmgr are different, of course). On June 10, 2016, I tried re-installing TeX Live 2016 and could reproduce the same proble