General Error Managed-keys.bind.jnl Create Permission Denied
Contents |
Common F23 Bugs Common F24 Bugs Communicate with Fedora The Documents Bug Reports Fedora managed-keys-zone: unable to synchronize managed keys: unexpected error Update System (Bodhi) Fedora Build System (Koji) Official Spins
Managed-keys-directory
FedoraForum.org > Fedora 23/24 > Servers & Networking BIND driving me crazy!! cannot find bind managed keys managed-keys.bind FedoraForum Search User Name Remember Me? Password Forgot Password? Join Us! Register All Albums FAQ Today's Posts Search Servers & Networking Discuss any error: journal open failed: unexpected error Fedora server problems and Networking issues such as dhcp, IP numbers, wlan, modems, etc. Google™ Search FedoraForum Search Red Hat Bugzilla Search Search Forums Show Threads Show Posts Tag Search Advanced Search Go to Page... Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes #1 14th July 2011, 08:28 PM AIM Systems Offline Registered User Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Guelph (pronounced Gwe-ELF), Ontario , Canada Posts: 40 BIND driving me crazy!! cannot find managed-keys.bind Bind on Fedora 14 is driving me crazy. I am getting messages when I restart BIND stating it cannot find the managed-keys.bind file but it's right where it's suppose to be, and the directory is writable. Code: # service named restart;tail -f /var/log/messages Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8347]: received control channel command 'stop' Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8347]: shutting down: flushing changes Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8347]: stopping command channel on 127.0.0.1#953 Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8347]: no longer listening on 127.0.0.1#53 Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8347]: no longer listening on 10.30.6.1#53 Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8347]: exiting Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8456]: starting BIND 9.7.4b1-RedHat-9.7.4-0.2.b1.fc14 -u named -t /var/named/chroot Jul 14 15:13:53 laird-host named[8456]: built with '--build=x86_64-redhat
Importance Assigned to Milestone bind9 (Debian) Edit New Unknown debbugs #316241 You need to log in to change this bug's status. Affecting: bind9 (Debian) Filed here by: Robie Basak When: 2012-12-06 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Debian Elbuntu Guadalinex Guadalinex Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD Linux Tilix tuXlab Ubuntu Ubuntu Linaro Evaluation Build Ubuntu RTM Package (Find…) Project (Find…) Status Importance New Unknown Assigned to unknown Remote Watch None, the status of the bug is updated manually. None, the status of the bug is updated manually. Debian Bug tracker #316241 URL: The information about this bug in Launchpad http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=266856 is automatically pulled daily from the remote bug. This information was last pulled on 2016-10-16. Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report bind9 (Ubuntu) Edit Triaged Medium Unassigned Edit You need to log in to change this bug's status. Affecting: bind9 (Ubuntu) Filed here by: Alex Bligh When: 2012-12-05 Confirmed: 2012-12-05 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Charms Collection Elbuntu Guadalinex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086775 Guadalinex Edu Kiwi Linux nUbuntu PLD Linux Tilix tuXlab Ubuntu Ubuntu Linaro Evaluation Build Ubuntu RTM Package (Find…) Project (Find…) Status Importance Triaged Medium Assigned to Nobody Me Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report Also affects project (?) Also affects distribution/package Nominate for series Bug Description Affects: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.8, 1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4ubuntu0.4, 1:9.8.4.dfsg-1ubuntu1. bind9.postinst only sets permissions on /var/cache/bind on a fresh install. When the bind9 package is removed but not purged, /var/cache/bind is removed, but /etc/bind is left alone (as expected). When the bind9 package is reinstalled from this state, the postinst fails to correct the default 755 permissions on /var/cache/bind. This is particularly a problem for users upgrading from Lucid, since this situation causes 100% CPU usage due to bug 1038199. Steps to reproduce: 1. Start with a Lucid system 2. apt-get install bind9 3. apt-get remove bind9 4. apt-get install bind9 Note broken permissions in /var/cache/bind. This isn't directly reproducible in Raring because files are now left behind in /var/cache/bind causing /var/cache/bind to not be removed when the package is removed (is this a separate bug?) However, if from Lucid you then do: 5. do-release-upgrade Then the problem propagates to Raring, an
Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the http://serverfault.com/questions/447913/bind-permission-errors workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Server Fault Questions Tags https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1971471&page=2 Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's unexpected error how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top BIND permission errors up vote 2 down vote favorite 1 I've been trying to use nsupdate to dynamiclly update my nameservers records. I get a serverfail when i attempt it. This is from the syslogs. Nov 12 08:00:53 general error managed-keys.bind.jnl ps133045 named[14314]: client 78.72.53.42#50135: signer "www.mydomain.com" approved Nov 12 08:00:53 ps133045 named[14314]: client 78.72.53.42#50135: updating zone 'mydomain.com/IN': adding an RR at 'client$ Nov 12 08:00:53 ps133045 named[14314]: /etc/bind/zones/mydomain.com.zone.jnl: create: permission denied Nov 12 08:00:53 ps133045 named[14314]: client 78.72.53.42#50135: updating zone 'mydomain.com/IN': error: journal open fai$ So I figured it was permissions, so to test I gave both /var/named and /etc/bind chmod 666 Didn't help, so I created the mydomain.com.zone.jnl file and chmod 600 it and thought that would do, I also did chown bind:bind and root:bind, but I still get the same error in both cases. Now I can't even restart bind due to this error Nov 12 08:40:10 ps133045 named[21169]: loading configuration from '/etc/bind/named.conf' Nov 12 08:40:10 ps133045 named[21169]: /etc/bind/named.conf.local:9: open: /var/named/dnskeys.conf: permission denied Nov 12 08:40:10 ps133045 named[21169]: loading configuration: permission denied Nov 12 08:40:10 ps133045 named[21169]: exiting (due to fatal error) I really don't understand these permission errors, in both cases I've tried chmod 666 on the files and chown bind:bind or root:bind. Still I get the errors. Here are the directory rights /var/named drw-rw
Get Kubuntu Get Xubuntu Get Lubuntu Get UbuntuStudio Get Mythbuntu Get Edubuntu Get Ubuntu-GNOME Get UbuntuKylin Ubuntu Code of Conduct Ubuntu Wiki Community Wiki Other Support Launchpad Answers Ubuntu IRC Support AskUbuntu Official Documentation User Documentation Social Media Facebook Twitter Useful Links Distrowatch Bugs: Ubuntu PPAs: Ubuntu Web Upd8: Ubuntu OMG! Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Specialised Support Ubuntu Servers, Cloud and Juju Server Platforms [SOLVED] Server load higher on 12.04 Having an Issue With Posting ? Do you want to help us debug the posting issues ? < is the place to report it, thanks ! Page 1 of 3 123 Last Jump to page: Results 1 to 10 of 28 Thread: Server load higher on 12.04 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Subscribe to this Thread… Display Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode May 2nd, 2012 #1 jrtboht View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message 5 Cups of Ubuntu Join Date May 2010 Beans 42 Server load higher on 12.04 I upgraded to 12.04 (from 11.10) yesterday and my average system load has gone from just under 1.0 most of the time to a fairly constant 1.5. Is this normal? Is it ok to be constantly that high? Adv Reply May 2nd, 2012 #2 CharlesA View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Visit Homepage Beware of Hat... Join Date Oct 2009 BeansHidden! DistroUbuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin Re: Server load higher on 12.04 What does htop or top say? System specs would be nice. Come to #ubuntuforums! We have cookies! | Basic Ubuntu Security Guide Tomorrow's an illusion and yesterday's a dream, today is a solution... Adv Reply May 2nd, 2012 #3 jrtboht View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message 5 Cups of Ubuntu Join Date May 2010 Beans 42 Re: Server load higher on 12.04 Here are the specs and output from uptime and top. Thanks! Code: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+ stepping : 0 cpu MHz : 2158.020 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36