Gamma Error
Contents |
reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Gamma Probability density function Cumulative distribution function Parameters k > 0 shape θ > 0 scale α > 0 shape β > 0 rate
Gamma Distribution
Support x ∈ ( 0 , ∞ ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle x\;\in \;(0,\,\infty )} x ∈ what is analytic cubism? ( 0 , ∞ ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle x\;\in \;(0,\,\infty )} PDF 1 Γ ( k ) θ k x k − 1 e which of the following is not correct regarding the differences between the two images below quizlet − x θ {\displaystyle {\frac α 3{\Gamma (k)\theta ^ α 2}}x^ α 1e^{-{\frac α 0{\theta }}}} β α Γ ( α ) x α − 1 e − β x {\displaystyle {\frac {\beta ^{\alpha }}{\Gamma (\alpha )}}x^{\alpha \,-\,1}e^{-\beta
Which Of The Following Explains Why Some Audiences Were Not Accepting Of Cubism?
x}} [1] CDF 1 Γ ( k ) γ ( k , x θ ) {\displaystyle {\frac α 5{\Gamma (k)}}\gamma \left(k,\,{\frac α 4{\theta }}\right)} 1 Γ ( α ) γ ( α , β x ) {\displaystyle {\frac α 1{\Gamma (\alpha )}}\gamma (\alpha ,\,\beta x)} Mean E [ X ] = k θ {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \mathbf ∼ 9 [X]=k\theta } E [ ln X ] = ψ ( k ) + ln ( θ )
What Is Gamma Correction
{\displaystyle \scriptstyle \mathbf ∼ 7 [\ln X]=\psi (k)+\ln(\theta )} (see digamma function) E [ X ] = α β {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \mathbf ∼ 5 [X]={\frac {\alpha }{\beta }}} E [ ln X ] = ψ ( α ) − ln ( β ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \mathbf ∼ 3 [\ln X]=\psi (\alpha )-\ln(\beta )} (see digamma function) Median No simple closed form No simple closed form Mode ( k − 1 ) θ for k ≥ 1 {\displaystyle \scriptstyle (k\,-\,1)\theta {\text{ for }}k\;{\geq }\;1} α − 1 β for α ≥ 1 {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\frac {\alpha \,-\,1}{\beta }}{\text{ for }}\alpha \;{\geq }\;1} Variance Var [ X ] = k θ 2 {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \operatorname ∼ 1 [X]=k\theta ^ ∼ 0} Var [ ln X ] = ψ 1 ( k ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \operatorname β 8 [\ln X]=\psi _ β 7(k)} (see trigamma function) Var [ X ] = α β 2 {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \operatorname β 5 [X]={\frac {\alpha }{\beta ^ β 4}}} Var [ ln X ] = ψ 1 ( α ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \operatorname β 2 [\ln X]=\psi _ β 1(\alpha )} (see trigamma function) Skewness 2 k {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\frac α 9{\sqrt α 8}}} 2 α {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\frac α 5{\sqrt {\alpha }}}} Excess kurtosis 6 k {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\frac α 3 α 2}} 6 α {\displaystyle \sc
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Photography Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question Into the Himalayas by eirenaios Submit your Photo Hall of Fame Please participate in Meta and help us grow. _ Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_distribution voted up and rise to the top Is this article correct about gamma error in picture scaling in common software? up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 That is kind of a "please proof-read an articles conclusion"-question. Some time ago I found this page: Gamma error in picture scaling. I grasp the point, that the luminosity-curve is not linear and that some (most) software does assume a linear scale and thus resizes badly. But as I http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/7812/is-this-article-correct-about-gamma-error-in-picture-scaling-in-common-software do not have so much experience in the field of image-manipulation / gamma / etc (just starting with the fine points of post-processing), let me ask you: is this guy right about this error during resizing? Is his method to determine erroneous software correct? software resolution gamma rescaling share|improve this question edited Jan 28 '11 at 14:11 mattdm 91k29264514 asked Jan 28 '11 at 12:23 Leonidas 2,6911120 The link is to a highly technical article that is less about photography than about algorithms used in photo manipulation software. I'd say this was off-topic. –NickM Jan 28 '11 at 12:57 2 Might be. But resizing is part of my picture-processing. I often batch-resize pictures before giving them out and wonder if this gamma-error a negative impact on them I did not really notice until now. (edit: I even resize for first evaluation, as my screen is only 1920x1080 and I like to evaluate full-picture instead of 100% zoom. So first sorting of pictures itself is impacted.) If the author is right, I'd better have a look into finding alternative SW. –Leonidas Jan 28 '11 at 13:21 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 3 down vote accepted Before even looking at the article, I say that there certainly is some amount of skew in levels when resizing a JPEG image. Thi
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19831176/error-when-running-glm-with-family-gamma site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Error when what is running glm with family=gamma up vote 1 down vote favorite I usually use SAS, so I am not too familiar with R so sorry if this is a basic question. I have run a model and it is coming up with the following error Error in family() : 0 arguments passed to 'gamma' which requires 1 Does anyone know what that means? Have looked which of the everywhere with no success The code is below: model1<-glm(heartrate ~ age+age*age+sex, family=gamma, data=df) r glm share|improve this question edited Nov 7 '13 at 8:39 Thomas 27.4k84175 asked Nov 7 '13 at 8:35 user2963880 83 3 Try capitalizing Gamma. –Thomas Nov 7 '13 at 8:39 @Thomas Yes, but we have to admit that it's not very clear for newcomers when you have functions named gamma and Gamma. I think this is a legitimate question that warrants an answer - for future generations. –Roman Luštrik Nov 7 '13 at 8:45 Of course it's something really simple, thank you so much! –user2963880 Nov 7 '13 at 8:56 @RomanLuštrik Fair point about gamma versus Gamma. I'll post as an answer and remove my close vote. –Thomas Nov 7 '13 at 8:56 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 3 down vote accepted The problem here is the difference between gamma and Gamma. Gamma() is a family object, like binomial, gaussian, etc: class(Gamma()) ? Gamma Whereas gamma() is a mathematical operation: gamma(1:10) ? gamma You want: model1 <- glm(heartrate ~ age+age*age+sex, family=Gamma, data=df) share
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Mon, 17 Oct 2016 03:35:05 GMT by s_ac15 (squid/3.5.20)