Home > error 41052 > error 41052

Error 41052

CommunityOracle User Group CommunityTopliners CommunityOTN Speaker BureauJava CommunityError: You don't have JavaScript enabled. This tool uses JavaScript and much of it will not work correctly without it enabled. Please turn JavaScript back on and reload this page.Search this communityOracle CommunityBridged communitiesOracle BlogsOracle University TrainingOracle VideosOTN DocumentationOTN Search ResultsSearch forSearch forContentSearch forPeopleSearch forPlacesLast modifiedLast modifiedAll timeLast modified1 dayLast modified7 daysLast modified30 daysLast modified90 daysLast modified1 yearSort byRelevanceRelevanceLast modifiedLast modifiedRestrict results byRestrict results by: PeopleRestrict results by: PlacesSubspace depthSubspace depthNo subspacesSubspace depthChild subspacesSubspace depthAll subspacesMatchingMatch names onlyDeactivated UsersShow/HideShowShowAll contentShowBlog postsShowDocumentsShowDiscussionsShowPollsShowIdeasShowStatus updatesShowMessagesShowExternal activityShowShowAll placesShowSpacesShowProjectsShowGroupsContent marked asShowAll ContentShowFinalShowReservedShowCommunity RecommendedShowOutdatedShowAction ItemShowDecisionShowHelpfulShowResolvedShowCommunity Feedback RequestedSocial Search On/OffSearchSearch TipsView more results from Oracle BlogsView more results from Oracle University TrainingView more results from Oracle VideosView more results from OTN DocumentationView more results from OTN Search ResultsAbout Oracle Technology Network (OTN)My Oracle Support Community (MOSC)MOS Support PortalAboutModern Marketing BlogRSS FeedPowered byOracle Technology NetworkOracle Communities DirectoryFAQAbout OracleOracle and SunRSS FeedsSubscribeCareersContact UsSite MapsLegal NoticesTerms of UseYour Privacy Rights© 2007-2016 Jive Software | Powered by Home | Top of pageJive Software Version: , revision: 20160414082626.1619a91.release_8.0.3.x

for Runtime Error 41052 If you are receiving a Runtime Error 41052 message, it is highly likely you have problems in the Windows registry. The Windows registry is the central engine of your PC and controls all functions and programs. Problems with the Windows registry such as 41052 can cause serious damage to your system if left unchecked. In order to fix the 41052 message, simply run a free scan and check your system for errors. Installation Instructions Click here to begin download Install and run RegCure Pro Start Scan Click "Fix https://community.oracle.com/community/developer/search.jspa?q=FRM-41052 All" and repair your PC Why Scan Your Computer For Runtime Error 41052? When you receive an error for Runtime Error 41052 this typically means: You have errors in the Windows registry The registry may be infected with spyware or viruses Fortunately by running a free scan with RegCure Pro you can fix both. RegCure Pro will both fix the Windows registry errors and remove any http://www.registry-clean-up.net/errors/runtime-errors/runtime-error-41052 spyware or viruses. Cleaning up the Windows registry with RegCure Pro can do the following: Fix all PC Errors Remove any Spyware or Viruses Lurking on your System Speed up your PC performance Improve Internet Speed Prevent Computer Freezing, Crashing, and Blue Screens Run A Free Scan and Fix Runtime Error 41052 Operating System: Windows7 (32-bit and 64-bit), Windows Vista (32-bit and 64-bit), or Windows XP (32-bit) Requirements: 20 MB free hard disk space for installation. FAQ's What Are Runtime Errors? Runtime Errors are related to software or hardware malfunctions related to the Windows registry. A Runtime Error can prevent you from using an application, cause you to lose information, or make an application run improperly. What Causes Runtime Errors? When you receive an error like Runtime Error 41052, then it means you have problems with the Windows registry. Since Runtime Errors come from hardware or software controlled by the registry, it is highly likely you have some serious registry errors that need to be fixed. This can occur from registry corruption, viruses, out of date drivers, or just wear and tear on an older computer. Why Should I Fix Runtime Errors? The Runtim

[x] First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Bug41052 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41052 - Error message when allocation group size too big is misleading Summary: Error message when allocation group size too big is misleading Status: CLOSED INVALID Product: File System Classification: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs-masters/2012-05/msg00012.html Unclassified Component: XFS Hardware: All Linux Importance: P1 low Assigned To: XFS Guru URL: Keywords: Depends on: Blocks: Show dependency tree /graph Reported: 2011-08-12 22:26 UTC by error 41052 linuxteer Modified: 2012-05-14 15:33 UTC (History) CC List: 2 users (show) alan sandeen See Also: Kernel Version: RHEL version 6.1 (2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.x86_64) Tree: Mainline Regression: No Attachments Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) Description linuxteer 2011-08-12 22:26:29 UTC Description of problem: In my test system I created a FS where the default allocation groups size happened to be error 41052 of about 1 GiB: [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.xfs -L nss6_1 -f -d su=512k,sw=20 -l sunit=512,size=64m /dev/sdc meta-data=/dev/sdc isize=256 agcount=37, agsize=268435328 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2 data = bsize=4096 blocks=9764864000, imaxpct=5 = sunit=128 swidth=2560 blks naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=16384, version=2 = sectsz=512 sunit=64 blks, lazy-count=1 realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 However if I specify less allocation groups then the default, instead of getting a message complaining of AG size too big I get this error message: [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.xfs -L nss6_1 -f -d agcount=31,su=512k,sw=20 -l sunit=512,size=64m ${dev1} Allocation group size (314995613) is not a multiple of the stripe unit (128) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): I am using a RHEL 6.1 server with kernel 2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.x86_64 and XFS packages: xfsprogs-devel-3.1.1-4.el6.x86_64 xfsprogs-3.1.1-4.el6.x86_64 xfsdump-3.0.4-2.el6.x86_64 xfsprogs-qa-devel-3.1.1-4.el6.x86_64 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a XFS FS where allocation groups size is over 1 TiB. 2. Inspect the misleading error message. 3. Actual results: "Allocation group size (314995613) is not a multiple of the stripe unit (128)" Expected results: "All

[Bug 41052] Error message when allocation group size too big is misleading From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Auto-submitted: auto-generated In-reply-to: References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41052 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Eric Sandeen 2012-05-14 15:33:41 --- Bug exists upstream too, but anyway, RHEL bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730433 Fixed by commit ddf12ea5dc56a728f24d24c5d7403c3412b40b86 Author: Eric Sandeen Date: Wed Mar 28 22:23:11 2012 -0500 mkfs.xfs: print std info if agcount makes agsize out of bounds When specifying a too-small agcount with stripe geometry, mkfs.xfs can fail with a somewhat unexpected message: $ mkfs.xfs -f -d file,name=fsfile,size=9764864000b,agcount=31,su=512k,sw=20 Allocation group size (314995613) is not a multiple of the stripe unit (128) This strikes me as especially odd because normally, mkfs.xfs tries to fix up the agsize to be a stripe multiple. The only way we get to the above error message is if ag _size_ is out of bounds; exiting with an error about alignment rather than about size seems odd. Maybe below is too clever, but if by the time we've decided that agsize is out of bounds after rounding it both up and down, as necessary, to get to a stripe-width multiple, calling validate_ag_geometry() will give us the same standard message as if we had specified no stripe geometry: $ mkfs/mkfs.xfs -f -d file,name=fsfile,size=9764864000b,agcount=31,su=512k,sw=20 agsize (314995613b) too big, maximum is 268435455 blocks Usage:


Related content

No related pages.