Compute The Kappa Statistic And Its Standard Error
Contents |
Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site
Large Sample Standard Errors Of Kappa And Weighted Kappa
About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about kappa confidence interval hiring developers or posting ads with us Cross Validated Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Cross Validated is
Kappa Confidence Interval Calculator
a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: cohen's kappa standard error Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Computing Cohen's Kappa variance (and standard errors) up vote 40 down vote favorite 11 The Kappa ($\kappa$) statistic was introduced in 1960 by Cohen [1] to measure agreement between two raters. Its variance, however, had been a source of contradictions for quite a some time. My question kappa confidence interval spss is about which is the best variance calculation to be used with large samples. I am a inclined to believe the one tested and verified by Fleiss [2] would be the right choice, but this does not seems to be the only published one which seems to be correct (and used thoroughly fairly recent literature). Right now I have two concrete ways to compute its asymptotic large sample variance: The corrected method published by Fleiss, Cohen and Everitt [2]; The delta method which can be found in the book by Colgaton, 2009 [4] (page 106). To illustrate some of this confusion, here is a quote by Fleiss, Cohen and Everitt [2], emphasis mine: Many human endeavors have been cursed with repeated failures before final success is achieved. The scaling of Mount Everest is one example. The discovery of the Northwest Passage is a second. The derivation of a correct standard error for kappa is a third. So, here is a small summary of what happened: 1960: Cohen publishes his paper "A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales" [1] introducing his chance-corrected measure of agreement between two raters called $\kappa$. However, he publishes incorrect formulas for
Descriptive Statistics Hypothesis Testing General Properties of Distributions Distributions Normal Distribution Sampling Distributions Binomial and Related Distributions Student's t Distribution Chi-square and F Distributions Other Key Distributions Testing for Normality and Symmetry ANOVA One-way ANOVA Factorial ANOVA
Kappa Confidence Interval Stata
ANOVA with Random or Nested Factors Design of Experiments ANOVA with Repeated Measures Analysis how to calculate confidence interval for kappa of Covariance (ANCOVA) Miscellaneous Correlation Reliability Non-parametric Tests Time Series Analysis Survival Analysis Handling Missing Data Regression Linear Regression Multiple Regression
Fleiss's Kappa
Logistic Regression Multinomial and Ordinal Logistic Regression Log-linear Regression Multivariate Descriptive Multivariate Statistics Multivariate Normal Distribution Hotelling’s T-square MANOVA Repeated Measures Tests Box’s Test Factor Analysis Cluster Analysis Appendix Mathematical Notation Excel Capabilities Matrices http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/30604/computing-cohens-kappa-variance-and-standard-errors and Iterative Procedures Linear Algebra and Advanced Matrix Topics Other Mathematical Topics Statistics Tables Bibliography Author Citation Blogs Tools Real Statistics Functions Multivariate Functions Time Series Analysis Functions Missing Data Functions Data Analysis Tools Contact Us Cohen's Kappa Cohen’s kappa is a measure of the agreement between two raters who determine which category a finite number of subjects belong to whereby agreement due to chance is factored out. The two http://www.real-statistics.com/reliability/cohens-kappa/ raters either a agree in their rating (i.e. the category that a subject is assigned to) or they disagree; there are no degrees of disagreement (i.e. no weightings). We illustrate the technique via the following example. Example 1: Two psychologists (judges) evaluate 50 patients as to whether they are psychotic, borderline or neither. The results are summarized in Figure 1. Figure 1 – Data for Example 1 We use Cohen’s kappa to measure the reliability of the diagnosis by measuring the agreement between the two judges, subtracting out agreement due to chance, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 – Calculation of Cohen’s kappa The diagnoses in agreement are located on the main diagonal of the table in Figure 1. Thus the percentage of agreement is 34/50 = 68%. But this figure includes agreement that is due to chance. E.g. Psychoses represents 16/50 = 32% of Judge 1’s diagnoses and 15/50 = 30% of Judge 2’s diagnoses. Thus 32% ∙ 30% = 9.6% of the agreement about this diagnosis is due to chance, i.e. 9.6% ∙ 50 = 4.8 of the cases. In a similar way, we see that 11.04 of the Borderline agreements and 2.42 of the Neither agreements are due to chance, which mean
measure than simple percent agreement calculation, since κ takes into account the agreement occurring by chance. Contents 1 Calculation 2 Example 3 Same percentages but different numbers 4 Significance and magnitude 5 Weighted kappa 6 Kappa maximum 7 Limitations 8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen's_kappa See also 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links 11.1 Online calculators Calculation[edit] Cohen's kappa measures the agreement between two raters who each classify N items into C mutually exclusive categories. The first mention of a kappa-like statistic is attributed to Galton (1892),[1] see Smeeton (1985).[2] The equation for κ is: κ = p o − p e 1 − p e = 1 − 1 − p o 1 − p confidence interval e , {\displaystyle \kappa ={\frac {p_{o}-p_{e}}{1-p_{e}}}=1-{\frac {1-p_{o}}{1-p_{e}}},\!} where po is the relative observed agreement among raters, and pe is the hypothetical probability of chance agreement, using the observed data to calculate the probabilities of each observer randomly saying each category. If the raters are in complete agreement then κ = 1. If there is no agreement among the raters other than what would be expected by chance (as given by pe), κ ≤ 0. kappa confidence interval The seminal paper introducing kappa as a new technique was published by Jacob Cohen in the journal Educational and Psychological Measurement in 1960.[3] A similar statistic, called pi, was proposed by Scott (1955). Cohen's kappa and Scott's pi differ in terms of how pe is calculated. Note that Cohen's kappa measures agreement between two raters only. For a similar measure of agreement (Fleiss' kappa) used when there are more than two raters, see Fleiss (1971). The Fleiss kappa, however, is a multi-rater generalization of Scott's pi statistic, not Cohen's kappa. Kappa is also used to compare performance in machine learning but the directional version known as Informedness or Youden's J statistic is argued to be more appropriate for supervised learning.[4] Example[edit] Suppose that you were analyzing data related to a group of 94 people applying for a grant. Each grant proposal was read by two readers and each reader either said "Yes" or "No" to the proposal. Suppose the disagreement count data were as follows, where A and B are readers, data on the main diagonal of the matrix (top left-bottom right) the count of agreements and the data off the main diagonal, disagreements: B Yes No A Yes a b No c d e.g. B Yes No A Yes 61 2 No 6 25 The observed pro
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Wed, 05 Oct 2016 04:17:14 GMT by s_hv997 (squid/3.5.20)